Assuming no injuries and no quotas pick a merit test day squad of 23

Kolisi will either step up or step down. No place to hide.

Eben or Marx. Even Faf. They'd be better captains. Look to who is doing the communicating. Who has the on field presence. Neither of those are Kolisi. There simply simply no grounds to defend his selection. 

Beeno

The stupid BSters are unable to read English and try to obscure the facts I listed by ducking and diving and by diverting attention away from it.   So -

*  Steenkamp was the bench player of Toulouse and failed miserably in the Argentine tests - which is kept quiet about;

*  Morrne the dear friend fo theirs - did miss a line kick - never said it was a penalty line kick and nothing said about his total disaster in defense in the Perth test;

*   Matfield did not miss the first own-throw line out when he came from the bnch and the penalty change-over because of Matfield did not count;

*   the BSter story about the Nonu tackle - cooked up by BSter no 1 is being still repeated - remember Goering - when you repeat the same lies enough times some people may yet believe them.

The other fact is BSter Assistant 1 made up some false stories about the Low performance by Louw and ran for cover when exposed.

So what have we got here - a series of falsified info the fools wants us to believe.      .   

Morné disaster? That test was than anything Jantjies or Lambie has dished up. It was by no means perfect, but very, very far from what you say. Very. It's also interesting that you cite that game because it debunks your narrative about him never ever playing flat. It's a mess. 

But anyone who reads the posts above will see how many assumptions you layered into your slabs of lies. 

BS alert.   Morne never missed the penalty line kick in the Perth test and he never missed 46% of attempted tackles in that test.   The Stade francais bench player was a top flyhalf!!!!!!   What BS can be dreamed up?   Foeitog.  

The word "worse" was left out above between the words "was" and "than" above.   After all Morne lost that test all on his own a nd even Meyer saw through it. 

Who missed the two tackles that allowed Australia to advance 60 metres and score the game winning try? Who won a crucial turnover right in Australia's 22 and nearly set up another try? Who put the backs away for a try in the corner? Who covered several failed tackles by their teammates? You have got to seriously be trolling. You just have to be. You aren't even making a lazy effort to appear legit. 

BS Alert - what a lot of utter crap.   If Morne did not miss the  penalty line kick - a regular shortcoming of him - there would have been a line-out on own throw by the Springboks and the yellow-carded Habana would have been allowed back on the field.   The Springboks would have had ball possession and there would not have been a counter-attack by the Aussies to score a try.  Missed tackle has zero to do with it - BSter.    We heard the missed tackle BS a number of times in the past in an attempt to sideline the real facts in the case. 

By the way Morne made 8 tackles in that game and missed 7 so how many failed tackles by other players did he correct?   He was the worst tackler that day by a mile. 

Squirming like a worm caught out and is now on a lying and distortion campaign as per normal. LMA O

No, you said several times over the past month that he directly conceded a try. Directly. You blamed him for exclusively for the loss. This is in fact a lie. How did the Wallaroos advance 60 metres? Who missed those tackles? I think it's reasonable to expect one's defence to hold up for a few phases with 60 metres of space behind them. Nobody is disputing that Morné failed on that kick, we understand the ramifications. He pushed too far into strong wind and it backfired. Something that wasn't in fact a commonality. Actually, Lambie has failed more often doing exactly the same thing. You exonerated him from blame kicking a few metres into touch, but failing. A big moment in a big game. You also exonerated Damian for a wild kick out in 2015 which landed directly into the hands of Lambie, with one half of the field exposed. Try. Something he did again with the Boks. How is it that they can directly lead to tries, and you don't say a word? How is it that Kriel concedes a game winning try and you blame Victor? Yet two crucial missed tackles which lead to a game winning try all of a sudden doesn't matter. You are a disgrace. He missed three tackles from in front and 4 as scramble defence. The Boks had trouble in general with the Aussies spreading out the Boks. They weren't targeting players, but spaces. They concentrated heavily on the space between 10 and 12.

Clever Mike, the squirming wee wirm ist Du. You have brought great shame upon yourself. All because you can't speak without tripping over your forked tongue. 

We are discussing players like Am, Dyanti, Willemse etc not because of their colour, but because of their performance. In fact, we are even looking at Am ahead of white players, and actually pointing out the merits of that selection. Not to ignore the valid points you have made, but I just find it refreshing.

They are quota players. Their performances are discussed, even when poor. Them quota players do not mean SA rugby did not train worse players, no matter the skin colour.

Those players are quota players.

A few reminders:

NH clubs do not sniff around those players. NH clubs eat players, they hire a lot of them. Quota players in SA are paid two chicken wings, three watermelons, they would be cheap to hire. No more selection policy to thwart the move. Yet NH clubs are not interested.

Those players did not even make into the hapless team SA rugby registered in the pro 14.

All in all, SA rugby could not field a quota player team able to beat Kenya.

Those players were added to the team to hide the situation in SA rugby.

SA rugby is a globalist venture. It is not localized rugby.

No to equality of opportunity, yes to equality of output.

Kenya rugby is the future of rugby. Argentian is the future of rugby. They play rugby. They are localized rugbys.

SA rugby failed. Cut the opportunity, respect the ouput. SA rugby keep leeching, it deprives other rugbys of essential resources.

Just remember Traditionalist that all rugby players are equal but some are more equal than others.

Fck you Trad, you are a sad excuse for how STUPID stupid can be. We know STUPID hurts, but it's hard to understand how one individual can acquire so much STUPID in only one lifetime...and it hurts so much too.  IDIOT!!!!

It is not that hard to understand: being exposed to SA rugby.

Just remember Traditionalist that all rugby players are equal but some are more equal than others.

Spot on. Just see the case of SA rugby players involved in brutal acts and how they are given a free pass for them.

Indeed, all rugby players are equal but some are more equaler than others.

SA rugby provide a lot of that.