FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Beeno February political column

Beeno February political column

Started by Beeno134 REPLIES861 VIEWS· 24 Feb 2016, 08:43
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
24 Feb 2016, 08:43
#1
24 Feb 2016, 08:43#1
I see that halfwit ab ass and his alias mong B has been try to flood the board with political threads in order to create a backlash against mine and other poster political posts etc.Clearly he is doing this to stop the discusssions taking place and create a from of censorship. It is obvious of course who is winning this debate and why he would want to do this.It is also obvious I have never created so many threads in one day!Now I also don't want the board flooded with political thread like they have done
So I plan to have one thread that runs to around fifty posts and the ther would be febraury 2 etc.
And please anybody not wanting to join in the discussion please feel free to stay away.
We trust that the thread will not sink to the level of calling Trump a Na zi etc. Such vile smear campaigns are contemptible and worthy onl of the most base persons!
Rooitwit I would recommend you pay close attention as you clearly have little clue as to what is happening.
Next on the agenda will be the Nevada results. And I guess ou maaaikie will be trying to explain again how a Trump win will demonstrate Trump cant win the nomination. BwhahahahaahahahahaWe will also need to keep an eye on Brexit - a monumental event unfolding.Of course we should also have a standing thread about the Mighty Stormers who I suspect are everyone's second favourite team
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
24 Feb 2016, 09:40
#2
24 Feb 2016, 09:40#2
 Beeno, thanks...I think....just a bit of advice. When you copy and paste, first past as normal/plain text into a Word document and then copy and paste onto this site. This will prevent the margins getting stuffed and will also cut out some of the other advertisements.
BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
24 Feb 2016, 09:41
#3
24 Feb 2016, 09:41#3
Refreshing post Beans! Glad you have posted your own thoughts ! Keep it up. 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
24 Feb 2016, 09:49
#4
24 Feb 2016, 09:49#4
 Beeno
You are entitled to your opinion on issues - but this is a RUGBY FORUM and the flooding of political and religion are not issues to be dealt with here.  I am opposed to flooding the site with those issues and I for one is against what is happening on this site.  Political and religious issues are personal and usage of those topics is driving away members from the site.

`  
AO
Admit OneClub Pro389 posts
24 Feb 2016, 09:52
#6
24 Feb 2016, 09:52#6
 
AO
Admit OneClub Pro389 posts
24 Feb 2016, 09:54
#9
24 Feb 2016, 09:54#9
  

 


AO
Admit OneClub Pro389 posts
24 Feb 2016, 09:58
#10
24 Feb 2016, 09:58#10
 What is Evolution?

Evolution is simply stated as change over time. Languages, societies, and knowledge all have the ability to evolve. In Biology, evolution refers to the change of genetic traits over time.

 [ References: Wikipedia: Evolution ]What is Natural Selection?

Natural Selection is one of the mechanisms which drives evolution. It is popularly characterized as "survival of the fittest," though that is not always the most accurate description. It is the tendency for life forms which are best suited to their environments to have a better chance to reproduce than those that are not. For example, in a cold environment, an animal with lots of fur is more likely to reproduce than a bald animal, since the bald animals will die more quickly.

 [ References: Wikipedia: Natural Selection ]Isn't Evolution Just a Theory?

Evolution is often criticized by opponents as being "just a theory." This argument is especially common in America, where the word "theory" usually means an unproven idea. However, in science a theory is the highest degree of certainty. Gravity is "just a theory." The Earth orbiting the Sun is "just a theory." By definition, a scientific theory is a hypothesis which has withstood rigorous testing and is well-supported by the facts. There is overwhelming evidence for biological evolution, just as there is overwhelming evidence for gravity.

 [ References: Talk Origins: Evolution is a Fact and a Theory ]Why Isn't Evolution Considered a Law?

This is an issue which often confuses the general public, as the two words, theory and law, have very different common meanings. But in science, their meanings are very similar. A theory is an explanation which is backed by "a considerable body of evidence," while a law is a set of regularities expressed in a "mathematical statement." This is why Newton's Laws of Motion are referred to as laws and not theories. They are expressed with simple equations (like f = ma for his 2nd Law of Motion). Evolution, and most of Biology, cannot be expressed in a concise mathematical equation, so it is referred to as a theory. A scientific law is not "better" or "more accurate" than a scientific theory. A law explains what will happen under certain circumstances, while a theory explains how it happens.

 [ References: Kennesaw State University: Scientific Laws and Theories ]Has Evolution Ever Been Observed?

Yes. Evolution has been observed both in the laboratory (diseases adapting to become resistant to drugs) and in nature (new species of flowers, mice, insects, etc. developing).

 [ References: TalkOrigins: Observed Instances of Speciation,
TalkOrigins: Some More Observed Speciation Events ]Isn't Evolution Totally Random?

While it is true that new traits can appear through the accumulation of small random genetic mutations, it is the non-random process of Natural Selection that determines which traits to keep and which to discard. For example, a random mutation may cause a brown squirrel to be born white. But if the squirrel lives on a brown tree, its color will quickly alert predators to its existence. The white squirrel will not live long enough to reproduce and pass on the trait. In this environment, nature selects for brown squirrels, not white. If the process were random, then the white squirrel would survive just as well as the brown.

 Don't Mutations Only Cause Problems, And Do Not Create New Information?

While it is true that many mutations can cause problems for an organism, sometimes lethal, not all mutations are harmful.  Most mutations are caused by single-point errors in the copying of a strand of DNA.  For example, a strand of ATAGC may change to ATATC.  This can have three major effects: a deleterious effect, a positive effect, or no effect at all.  Deleterious effects, those which threaten the survival of the organism, will not accumulate, because they will kill the organism before it has a chance to reproduce.  Conversely, mutations which cause no effect or a positive effect will accumulate in a population's genome.  This is how Natural Selection works.  It "selects" for positive changes in the genome, because only the positive changes will accumulate.

Certain mutations can add new, large pieces of DNA at a time. See this question on Gene Duplication for more information.

 [ References: TalkOrigins: Mutations adding information ]How Does Evolution Cause the Increases in Genetic Information Required to go from Single-Celled Life to Complex Animals?

This is accomplished through a process called Gene Duplication, which is believed to play a major role in Evolution.  Because of a mistake during meiosis, an organism may end up with two copies of the same gene. After this happens, the usual mechanisms of point mutation and natural selection can evolve one of the copies into coding for something completely new, while retaining the original gene. To test how quickly gene duplication can occur, an experiment was performed on yeast in 1998.  After only 450 generations, it was discovered that the "hexose transport" genes had duplicated several times.

 [ References: TalkOrigins: Mutations adding information,
Wikipedia: Gene Duplication ]Aren't the Chances of Life Forming Randomly Less Than 1 in a Trillion?

This claim is based on the calculations of all of the millions of molecules in a single cell forming by chance. No scientist believes this is how life formed. Instead, most theories of "abiogenesis" begin with simple self-replicating molecules which could have formed naturally.  It is believed that such a self-replicating molecule formed the earliest versions of DNA. After many thousands of years of adaptations, all governed by the non-random process of Natural Selection, did the first microbe finally develop.

For a more detailed explanation of the math involved, please see the article on this site titled The Probability of Life.

 [ References: Probability of Abiogenisis Calculations (Talk Origins) ]How Could DNA Have Evolved?

While there is no direct fossil evidence for the evolution of DNA (because of its size and fragility), scientists have theorized on its origins based on verified laboratory evidence.  One theory goes like this:  RNA, the compliment molecule to DNA, was the first to evolve naturally from materials already common in the pre-biotic Earth.  Self-replication was achieved through catalytic actions in RNA-based molecules, called ribosomes, or possibly through an intermediary molecule.  This step still remains unverified to science as of this writing.

Once self-replication had been achieved, the forces of Natural Selection took over.  For example, those molecules which were protected from the elements survived longer and reproduced more.  So, any molecules which found themselves with a lipid bubble (which also forms naturally) would have a better chance of reproducing.  After many incremental steps, the lipid bubbles eventually became cell membranes, and the molecules DNA.

For more information on the probability of life forming this way, please see this article.

 [ References: Evolution of DNA,
Probability of Abiogenisis Calculations (Talk Origins),
RNA World Theory (Wikipedia) ]Have Scientists Ever Created Life in a Laboratory?

As of the time of this writing, no, scientists have never created cellular life in a laboratory from scratch.  The technology simply does not yet exist to manipulate molecules with the precision required to create all of the inner workings of a cell, built one atom at a time.

However, many of the important building blocks of life have indeed been created in a laboratory, including amino acids, self-replicating RNA molecules, and self-sealing and self-replicating lipid bubbles (ie, cell membranes) which are profound steps toward the goal of one day creating fully-synthetic life.

 [ References: Life As We Know It Nearly Created in Lab - Live Science,
Wikipedia: Miller-Urey Experiment ]What is the Fossil Record?

The "fossil record" refers to the placement of fossils throughout the surface layers of the Earth. Older fossils are buried more deeply than younger ones. Scientists use the placement of fossils as a guide for determining when life forms existed, and how they evolved. For example, we know that flowering plants evolved from non-flowering plants because, in the fossil record, we see flower fossils becoming more and more primitive the deeper we go, until they disappear all together. There are no flower fossils below a certain depth. This shows us that flowering plants evolved from non-flowering plants, then began to diversify themselves. This kind of progression is found throughout the fossil record.

 [ References: Wikipedia: Fossil Record ]Why Aren't There More Transitional Fossils?

Transitional fossils bridge gaps between two species. Due to the difficulties in creating fossils in the first place, and the fact that speciation sometimes occurs very quickly in small groups, transitional fossils can be rare in the fossil record. However, even given these circumstances, there are still thousands of transitional fossils known to science, including those illustrating the evolution of modern fish, the transition of fish to amphibians, amphibians to reptiles, reptiles to birds, reptiles to mammals, and the evolution of human beings (as well as many other species).

Please see this video for great examples of transitional fossils:http://www.evolutionfaq.com/videos/transitional-fossils

Also, see this Wikipedia page detailing just a partial list of transitional fossil examples:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils

 [ References: Wikipedia: List of Transitional Fossils,
TalkOrigins: Transitional Vertebrate Fossils FAQ,
TalkOrigins: 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution ]If Man Evolved From Ape, Then Why Are There Still Apes?

Firstly, man did not evolve from modern apes. Man and modern apes share a common ancestor, which is extinct. However, the question comes from a flawed understanding of how evolution works. Evolution is not a straight line, where entire populations change into new species all at the same time. Often times, a small group breaks away from a population and begins to evolve independently of the source group. The source group does not need to go extinct, and is generally unaffected by the development of the smaller group.  This is called "Allopatric Speciation," and it is just one of many ways that new species can evolve. There is nothing in evolutionary theory which states a source population must go extinct in order for new species to evolve.

 [ References: Wikipedia: Allopatric Speciation,
Wikipedia: Speciation Modes ]What About the Missing Link?

The concept of a "missing link" between humans and apes arose in the 19th century, when the fossil record was largely incomplete. Large gaps separated species, casting doubt on the theory of evolution. But in the last 130 years, a plethora of fossils have been discovered, greatly narrowing the gaps between species. The Australopithecus afarensis fossil known as "Lucy" is considered to be a key fossil bridging the gap between humans and primitive hominids.

 [ References: Wikipedia: Astralopithecus afarensis ]Can You Believe in God and Evolution at the Same Time?

Of course. Many faiths accept evolution as the explanation for the current level of biodiversity, usually stipulating that a creator initially designed the Universe, or guided the processes of evolution. In fact, in 1996, Pope John Paul II reaffirmed the Catholic Church's position that evolution does not conflict with Christianity. Evolution does not contradict the overall philosophy of the Bible, Torah, Koran, or any religious text.

 [ References: TalkOrigins: God and Evolution,
TalkOrigins: Interpretations of Genesis ]Did Darwin Recant Evolution on his Deathbed?

Darwin was very proud of his scientific discoveries, and it is highly unlikely he would have recanted them. There is no supporting evidence for this story, and Darwin's daughter, who was at her father's deathbed, refutes it. But even if it were true, it would not matter. Biological evolution has been experimentally proven many times over. The worth of a theory is measured by how well it is supported by the facts, not by who believes it.

 [ References: Darwin's Deathbed Conversion - a Legend? (Mitchell, 2009) ]Are Humans Evolving To Lose Our Smallest Toe?

No, this is a bit of an "old wive's tale."  Our smallest toe (or 'pinkie toe' as some call it) is here to stay.  This is because organisms don't just lose traits or appendages simply because they aren't useful anymore.  There would need to be a threat to our survival or reproduction, directly caused by us having our smallest toe.  In that scenario, individuals born with smaller pinkie toes would have an advantage over those with longer ones.  Over many generations, this would cause pinkie toes to get smaller and smaller, until gone.

This is how whales lost their small hind legs, for example.  A more streamlined whale swims faster, and so evades predators and catches food faster.  This drove their legs to get smaller and smaller until they virtually vanished (though in skeletons you can still see their pelvises).  However, there are no pressures like this involving our pinkie toes.

 Isn't it True that Most Scientists Don't Believe in Evolution?

No. According to Newsweek magazine, 99.85% of American earth and life scientists accept biological evolution as a fact. Gallup polls also show that 95% of all scientists accept evolution, though it should be noted that this figure includes scientists who study in unrelated fields, like Computer Science, Engineering, etc. The vast majority of scientists accept evolution as fact.

 [ References: Public Beliefs About Evolution and Creation,
TalkOrigins: Scientists Reject Evolution? ]How Old is the Earth?

Based on the experimental data of numerous independent dating techniques, we know the Earth to be approximately 4.55 billion years old.

 [ References: Talk Origins: The Age of the Earth ]Isn't Carbon Dating Unreliable?

Radiocarbon dating is just one of many "radiometric" dating techniques. While contamination in the laboratory might happen on rare occasions, radiometric dating remains a trusted and reliable method of determining the age of a sample. The technique relies on the constant rate of decay of certain radioactive elements in the sample. For example, rubidium-strontium dating relies on the decay of rubidium-87 to strontium-87. Rubidium-87 has a half-life of 50 million years (the amount of time for half its mass to decay into strontium). Using this figure, scientists measure the amount of rubidium and strontium in a sample to determine its age.

 [ References: Wikipedia: Radiometric Dating ]Doesn't Evolution Violate the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics?

The second law states that "In a closed system (one in which energy cannot enter), Entropy will not decrease." Since Entropy often refers to disorder, this law is often taken to mean that order cannot arise from disorder. How then would life, which is highly ordered, form naturally? The answer, simply, is that life is not a closed system. Energy is constantly being added to the Earth from the Sun, which fuels the plants, which in turn fuel other life. This is how plants, for example, can have more energy than the seeds they originally sprouted from. But life is not the only example of order from disorder. Snowflakes, crystals, lightning, and sand dunes are all examples of non-living matter organizing into complex structures.

 [ References: TalkOrigins: Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution ]What is Intelligent Design?

Intelligent Design (ID) is the hypothesis that a higher intelligence (ex: a god, space aliens, time travellers from the future, etc.) guided the course of evolution.  Most often, Intelligent Design refers to a god, typically the Christian/Jewish/Muslim god, YHWH or Allah.  In other words, God from the Bible.

ID differs from traditional religions in that proponents recognize that biological evolution is responsible for the development and diversity of life on Earth.  It is similar to traditional religions in that it typically posits a supernatural explanation for what guided the evolution of certain species (including humans).  In this way, ID is similar to the 4th century BC belief put forward by Plato and Aristotle of a "prime mover," that is, a being which set the natural world in motion.

 [ References: Wikipedia: Intelligent Design,
Wikipedia: Unmoved or Prime Mover ]Is There any Evidence for Intelligent Design?

This has been a hotly debated question in the media, classrooms, and many churches.  According to authors like Michael Behe, there are certain structures in nature which he terms "irreducibly complex," which, he asserts, could not have evolved naturally.  He gives bacterial flagellum and the eye, among others, as examples.  If true, these might be evidence for Intelligent Design.

However, the vast majority of the scientific community regards Intelligent Design as psuedoscience or "junk science."  The structures that Behe and others give as examples have proven evolutionary histories.  For an example, watch The Evolution of the Eye video on this site. Recently at the famous Dover trial, the court held that  "Professor Behe's claim for irreducible complexity has been refuted in peer-reviewed research papers and has been rejected by the scientific community at large."

To date, there has never been any evidence, agreed upon by the scientific community, to be proof of Intelligent Design.

 [ References: Wikipedia: Intelligent Design,
Wikipedia: Irreducible Complexity ]Is the Eye Too Complex to have Evolved Naturally?

It is often argued that the eye is so complex that it could not have evolved naturally.  The idea being that an eye with only "half" the parts in place would not work, therefor evolution would have never favored it and the more complex human eye we have would never have evolved.

However, the evolution of the eye has been studied extensively, and its history is more-or-less well established.  First, there were light-sensitive cells which merely indicated which way was the Sun.  A slight indentation makes a sense of direction possible.  Mucus in the pit focuses the light.  If the mucus hardens, you have a proper lens, and so on.

In fact, every stage of the eye's development is still around on Earth today.  A snail's eye is less than "half" a human eye, yet it serves the snail well enough to help its survival.

Please watch this video which beautifully describes the evolution of the eye for a more visual example.

 [ References: Wikipedia - Evolution of the Eye ]Isn't it True That the Bacterial Flagellum Could Not Have Evolved?

This is a statement often asserted by proponents of Intelligent Design, but it is simply not true.  The argument goes that since the flagellum (the tail-like structure many bacteria have which helps them "swim") is a very complex machine, it could not have evolved naturally.  This is because if you remove any of the proteins that make up the flagellum's motor, it can no longer function.

However, as this video beautifully demonstrates, the flagellum does function with fewer proteins, just not as a flagellum.  Every part of the flagellum is made of proteins already in the cell, performing other functions.  This is one of the most interesting aspects of Evolution: that adaptations can change roles, or combine with other adaptations to perform new roles.

 [ References: Irreducible Complexity (bacterial flagellum) debunked [Video],
Wikipedia: Evolution of Flagella ]Isn't Evolution Just Another Religion That Requires Faith?

No.  A religion is a set of beliefs based on the supernatural, which by definition is untestable and impossible to disprove (or "unfalsifiable").  Faith, in the religious sense, can be stated as "belief without evidence."  No aspect of science works this way, including the Theory of Evolution.  All scientific theories have been scrutinized through years of experimentation, and can all be falsifiable.  For example, the Theory of Gravity can be proven false if a scientist can devise an experiment where two bodies did not attract each other.  Likewise, the Theory of Evolution could be proven false if a scientist ever documents the evolution of a new adaptation to an organism which did not in any way benefit the organism's ability to survive, reproduce, or ensure the survival of its species as a whole.

While scientists may place faith in a scientific theory, their faith is based on past evidence.  For example, all scientists have faith that the Law of Thermodynamics will hold true during an experiment because there is overwhelming past evidence to support this belief.  This is completely different than placing faith in a religious belief, which has no supporting evidence at all.

 If the Sun is Losing 5 Feet of Diameter Every Hour, Wouldn't It Have Been Too Large Billions of Years Ago?

This argument comes from a paper published in 1979 by astronomer John Eddy. After studying observations from 1836 through the 20th century, he found the sun had contracted 2 arc seconds. He had found proof of what atronomers had suspected and know for a fact today: that the sun's diameter oscillates in an 80 year cycle. It does not constantly shrink

Within the sun, and every star, there are 2 opposing forces: the intense gravity of the star, trying to crush it, and the intense heat of nuclear fusion, trying to blow it apart. As the gravitational field causes the surface to shrink ever so slightly, it builds incredible pressure inside the star, which speeds up the fusion reactions (think of a pressure cooker). The increased fusion then pushes the surface back out again, and the cycle starts over. Because the sun is truly gigantic, about 1 million times the size of Earth, this cycle plays out on what we would consider a slow scale: every 80 years.

 [ References: The Legend of the Shrinking Sun (Till) ]© Evolution FAQ, all rights reserved.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
24 Feb 2016, 10:08
#11
24 Feb 2016, 10:08#11
 Well all this has zero to do with rugby and I am glad the margins of the thread has been distorted.  
AO
Admit OneClub Pro389 posts
24 Feb 2016, 10:20
#12
24 Feb 2016, 10:20#12
 The remarkable evolution of the modern day rugby player

The players at this year's World Cup are setting new records for physical extremes - but how far have they come and what do they go through?

Betway - 21 September 2015  

Related Articles

From blistering runs to bludgeoning scrums, with countless shuddering hits in between.

The physical extremes reached by players during the opening weekend of the Rugby World Cup have been clear for all to see.

Indeed, modern rugby is almost unrecognisable to the game that was played at the inaugural tournament in 1987.

The arrival of the professional era combined with considerable advances in sports science mean that the physical demands of the sport have reached a level that has never been seen before.

As a result, players must strive to be bigger, faster and stronger than ever before.

So, just how extreme are the expectations placed upon a modern rugby and what must they go through in order to achieve their targets?

Let's find out.

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
24 Feb 2016, 11:04
#13
24 Feb 2016, 11:04#13
 Margins stuffed when viewing on my phone.
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
24 Feb 2016, 11:44
#14
24 Feb 2016, 11:44#14
 Beano ffs. grow up .
AB
ABasquefanPro2,549 posts
24 Feb 2016, 11:47
#15
24 Feb 2016, 11:47#15
 "So I plan to have one thread that runs to around fifty posts and the ther would be febraury 2 etc."


Nope.
You have no measure at all, you've been flooding the site with propaganda for a long time provoking members to quit posting and leaving the site.
It's very clear what people thinks
6. Enough Trump/Drumpf/Von Clownstick


To the cricket section with your fascist propaganda.


JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
24 Feb 2016, 13:08
#16
24 Feb 2016, 13:08#16
Beeno, fortunately February is a short month.
Glad you found time to finally comment on the weee stormers.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
24 Feb 2016, 13:46
#17
24 Feb 2016, 13:46#17
 Draad I have only contributed the opening post which was not  a copy and paste.Somebody else fouled up the thread. Copy what you were saying here it seemed useful advice.
Ou maaaikie I am sure you would love to stop all comment on USA election for starters. Up to now in terms of volume of posts you have been a star performer even if the content has been highly suspect and one eyed. Its seems hypocritical now that more egg is landing on you every day you want to stop others from discussing these issues. Firstly my message to you remains the same. If you don't like it and cant take all the EGG landing don't come on the monthly thread. What don't you understand - hahahahahahaha ou maaaikie has to be told the same things again and again. also, you made you the boards policeman. Bwhahahahahaha now the dope has delusions of grandeur!Ou maaaike seeing that you are hanging around in eager anticipation of Beeno's next comment I have to ask you what do you think of the Nevada results. The latest I have found ex the NY Times is Trump at 45.9 %, the establishment candidate rubio at 23.9 and Cruz at 21.4.Perhaps for a good laugh you would care to explain why you think this bodes ill for Trump. HahahahahahahahahaAs for ab ass he is in a complete froth failing to realise his nazi slander posts reflect so badly on him - what a warped oak he is!. Warped DUD, a very notable warped oak, has hopefully departed but he could be back so dry your eyes ab ass and soldier  -  your weeping and wailing about his departure makes me wonder about the two of you. Nobody forced him to go he left of his own free will.The halfwit was following me around the board ranting away day by day so his departure has been no loss. Liked to dish it out but had a glass jaw. Admit one if you had read my excellent posts re the daft theory and dead theory of evolution you would not have( if you could understand the articles) been as silly as to post this crazy nonsense. Assuming of course you are in your right mind.
Bob what is your complaint you are usually a reasonable oak?


BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
24 Feb 2016, 13:50
#18
24 Feb 2016, 13:50#18
 Ou maaaikie has a closed sort of municipality type of mind so here i something to enlighten. Him Nobody likes see ou maaaikie under a mountain of EGG all day!


Tuesday after Fox News declared Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump as the winner of the Nevada Republican Caucus, Las Vegas casino magnate Steve Wynn weighed in on the outcome in his home state.

Wynn told “Special Report” anchor Bret Baier he saw Trump as “most likely” the GOP nominee.

“[T]hey’re morphing with this man,” Wynn said. “At first, I don’t think everybody took him so seriously. And now, we have a situation where Trump looks most likely the nominee for the Republican Party. There is so much riding on this election. I think everybody is going to want to pull to make sure we get a Republican president and Republican Senate and the House.

Later in the segment, Wynn described the GOP contest as Trump’s “to lose.”

I think Trump looks like — it’s his to lose,” Wynn added. “In bookmaking operations they talk about the favorite. He’s the favorite. But what is good news is that there is a lot of talent on the Republican side. Donald, Rubio, all of them. They’re all really qualified people and I think a lot more qualified than what I’m seeing on the other side.”

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
24 Feb 2016, 13:56
#19
24 Feb 2016, 13:56#19
 After each win ou maaaikie gets more hysterical. beeno talking nonsense. trump will never win it. I hope his closed mind is opening to the distict possibility.Trumps victory speeech

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump enthusiastically declared his campaign to be a “winning” one in a speech after winning the Nevada Republican caucus on Tuesday.

Trump said, “You know, we weren’t expected a couple of months ago, we weren’t expected to win this one. You know that, right? We weren’t. Of course, if you listen to the pundits (like ou maaikie), we weren’t expected to win too much. And now we’re winning winning winning the country. And soon the country is going to start winning winning winning.”

After touting his numbers in some of the upcoming primary states, Trump stated, “It’s going to be an amazing two months. We might not even need the two months, folks, to be honest, all right?” Trump further predicted that he would inherit a lot of the votes of other candidates if they dropped out. Later on, he touted his numbers among Evangelicals, and winning among young voters, old voters, highly-educated, “poorly-educated” voters, and Hispanic voters.

After touting his support for the Second Amendment, he added, “Now we’re going to get greedy for the United States. We’re going to grab and grab and grab.”

Later, Trump said he would keep Guantanamo Bay open and “load it up with bad dudes” before turning to immigration.

Trump concluded, “We’re going to be the smart people. You’re going to be proud of your president, and you’re going to be even prouder of your country, OK?”

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
24 Feb 2016, 13:58
#20
24 Feb 2016, 13:58#20
 ab ass if you want to see hitler type oaks in action take a look at the islamic countries.When Trump becomes president are you going to come on here and say Americans are nazis?
What a hatter ou ab ass is! No wonder he and warped dud are mates!!
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
24 Feb 2016, 14:02
#21
24 Feb 2016, 14:02#21
 Van Jones Concedes Trump Can Win White House:

Late at night, Democrats like Van Jones reveal inconvenient truths they often try to hide. Last week, Jones said that black Americans may support Trump in the general election. Today, he said on CNN that Democrats need to take Trump seriously because he can make it all the way to the White House because he is opposing the Trans-Pacific Partnership deal and fighting for fairer trade deals for American workers.

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
24 Feb 2016, 14:59
#22
24 Feb 2016, 14:59#22
 The evolution post stuffed up the margins.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
25 Feb 2016, 08:14
#23
25 Feb 2016, 08:14#23
 Quite so Draad but then again the whole stupid article was a waste of space. Fancy being so daft as to post that discredited rubbish! Hahahahahahahahaha ou admit 1 has to admit he fouled up.Meanwhile ab ass continues to foul up the board claiming Trump and his millions of followers are nazi. In fact I would guess he will be ranting on against the USA more Vehmently than ever when Trump becomes president calling the Americans nazis. I feel pretty sure ab ass is an islamic radical. But lets face it the muslims in Europe and the States are becoming more and more unpopular and they only have themselves to blame. Telling the Europeans they are there to take over hardly endears them to the Europeans and of course sharia law is a nightmare.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
25 Feb 2016, 08:27
#24
25 Feb 2016, 08:27#24
 Now a former islamist warms Germany of the generational dangers. Thankfully this guy saw the light - if he can be believed as remember muslims can lie to non muslims - allowed by the koran.Its all coming out now and Merkel's popularity is dropping like a stone. 

A former radical Islamist spoke at a German university about the “generational” dangers of radical Islamism among young Germans and incoming migrants.

Ahmad Mansour is a psychologist and author who used to be a radical Islamist. He recently published a book which calls for Germans to beware of the seduction of radical Islam that is enticing German youth. The book, called ‘Generation Allah – Why We need to Rethink the Fight Against Religious Extremism‘, comes at the subject from a psychological perspective.

Mr. Mansour examines how Islam has become more than a religion to many in the Middle East and instead has become a cornerstone of their identity as human beings.

The author gave a talk at Hamburg University yesterday and answered questions on his book and the migrant crisis. German paper Hamburg Abendblatt interviewed him later asking whether in the aftermath of Cologne German women should fear Muslim migrants. He said:

“I can’t give you a flat yes answer, but we all should think that among us humans, there are very different values than ours and this is a group that is growing larger from year to year.”

He goes on to say that he believes it is a very generational problem and that both migrants and Muslims living in the west, as citizens or not, may think the same. saying:

I want to get away from the narrow discussion of the few young people who connect with the Islamic State. This is only the tip of the iceberg. I’d like to talk about those who belong to us. Those who go to our schools and still partially reject our values . We are dealing with numerous problems.

“This is not only the handling of sexuality. There are conspiracy theories, anti-Semitism and patriarchal structures. There is the understanding that their religion is a taboo subject and that one must not scrutinise teenagers. And others, people devalue because they have a different opinion. That’s not everyone, but the problem has a huge dimension.”

He said that many Germans simply don’t see the problem because they don’t go where many muslims go. The schools and the mosques are prime places where the behaviour he describes is manifested, but he says but Germans don’t know because, “it is not openly discussed. The topics are taboo,”(Thanks to nutters like Merkel) and that “the problems are in the schools because of the existence of this Generation Allah.

Also mentioned was the rise in anti-Semitic behaviour which in countries like France has led to Jews being so scared for their safety that many have left for Israel, as Breitbart hasreported. “There are dedicated teachers who raise the issue (of antisemitism) in the classroom and then suddenly realize how widespread ‘Jew’ has become a dirty word,” among the students.

Teachers are losing hope according to Mr. Mansour, and many come to him asking for advice because they feel like they are trapped by political correctness and cannot speak out about what is going on in their classroom. He even describes teachers who cannot deal with radicalised students who proselytize Salafism in class and send videos of radical Islamic preachers to their fellow classmates.

The interviewer asked Mr. Mansour about Hamburg in particular. He said: “Hamburg is affected by Salafism. There were also New Year’s assaults here. Parallel societies have partially emerged. In schools anti-Semitism is widespread, teachers tell me that they do not always get the support of the school management when addressing the problem.”

When asked is there could be a solution to the problem he replied: “It will be tedious and long. This is the task of the century.”

Wake up Germany you are digging a pit for yourself. Ship all these muslims back to their own countries NOW.



BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
25 Feb 2016, 22:03
#25
25 Feb 2016, 22:03#25
 But good news is Trump looks well ahead in Rubios home state Florida where 99 delgates are up for grab winner takes all.More food for thought for ou maaaike whose is battling to comprehend what is going on.
I noter in passing that thsoe thinking Trump will win the GOP nomination is growingas are thsoe thinking he will win the presidency. So all is going wellI npote also that Hungary is havinga referendum re immigration. A Eu chief says EU immigration policy will collapse in 10 days.

Donald Trump is dominating the GOP presidential field in Florida, a new Quinnipiac University poll shows.

The billionaire businessman received 44% in the poll released Thursday, well ahead of home-state Sen. Marco Rubio, who got 28%. Following were Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas (12%)  Ohio Gov. John Kasich (7%) and retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson (4%).

OUMAAAIKIE ITS CALLED MOMENTUM! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA I GIUESS MOMENTUM IS NOT SOMETHING THA T HAPPENS IN MUNICIPALITY OFFICES AND HENCE THE PROBLEM!

“The size and shape of Trump’s lead is impressive," said Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll. "He leads in every age group by 9 to 19 percentage points. He does better among men than among women and, despite being a New York multi-billionaire, he leads among those who identify with the tea party."

AB
ABasquefanPro2,549 posts
25 Feb 2016, 22:11
#26
25 Feb 2016, 22:11#26
 

Progressive Secular Humanist

Get Patheos Atheist Newsletters

Follow Patheos
Atheist:

« Porn Star Sues Josh Duggar For Sexual Assault
Watch: Bill Maher Calls Donald Trump ‘Fake Mussolini’ »Trump Goes Full Nazi: Wants To Close Mosques, Make Muslims Wear IDNovember 19, 2015 by Michael Stone 10 Comments

Fascism rising: GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump fans Republican hysteria and America’s growing fear of Muslims after the massacre in Paris.

According to a recent interview, the GOP presidential front runner said he is open to registering U.S. Muslims in a database or giving them special identification identifying their faith, something Nazi Germany did to Jewish citizens leading up to the holocaust (Hitler’s Third Reich required Jews to wear a yellow badge resembling the Star of David).

Yahoo News asked Trump whether the level of tracking he was proposing might require registering Muslims in a database or giving them a form of special identification that noted their religion. Trump said he wouldn’t rule it out:

We’re going to have to — we’re going to have to look at a lot of things very closely. We’re going to have to look at the mosques. We’re going to have to look very, very carefully.

Earlier this week, during Tuesday night’s edition of Hannity on Fox News, Trump argued that authorities should close mosques in order to prevent an attack inside the U.S.

Explaining to Hannity why the U.S. must close mosques, Trump said:

Nobody wants to say this and nobody wants to shut down religious institutions or anything, but you know, you understand it. A lot of people understand it. We’re going to have no choice.

There’s absolutely no choice.

Politico reports that in a string of new radio ads announced Wednesday, Trump and his supporters talk tough about the candidate’s plan to strengthen the military and to defeat the Islamic State. In the new ads, Trump warns against allowing refugees from Syria into the country while pledging to “quickly and decisively bomb the hell out of ISIS.”

The bad new is that Trump’s bellicose flirtations with fascism is working. The Hill reports that according to most of the polls released in the aftermath of the Paris terrorist attacks, Trump has gained political strength.

As for Trump’s over the top anti-Muslim rhetoric, this is nothing new. Trump was calling for the closure of mosques back in October, long before the terrorist attacks in Paris.

Bottom line: Many Republicans are angry, frightened, and dumb. And so far Trump has proven to be a master at manipulating that fear, anger, and stupidity to his own political advantage.

“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.”

– Anonymous

(Image via Twitter)

Filed Under: Islam, Politics 10 Comments

Related posts from Progressive Secular Humanist:Bernie Sanders Reaffirms Humanist Stance At Democratic Town HallMississippi Governor Declares April ‘Confederate Heritage Month’Pope Francis: Donald Trump ‘Is Not Christian’ State Sponsored Discrimination: Georgia Passes Religious Freedom Bill « Porn Star Sues Josh Duggar For Sexual Assault
Watch: Bill Maher Calls Donald Trump ‘Fake Mussolini’ »Subscribe by email to Progressive Secular Humanist Follow Progressive Secular Humanist!Popular at Patheos Atheist Obama eliminates “abstinence only” education from federal budget Obama Removes All Funding For ‘Abstinence-Only’ Sex Education Ted Cruz: A Liberal Supreme Court Would Mean “Sandblasting” Religious Symbols Off Veterans’ Graves Obama’s 2017 budget removes ALL funding for abstinence-only education.Categories CategoriesArchives Archives Trending at Patheos AtheistRecent Comments
AB
ABasquefanPro2,549 posts
25 Feb 2016, 22:12
#27
25 Feb 2016, 22:12#27
 

Progressive Secular Humanist

Get Patheos Atheist Newsletters

Follow Patheos
Atheist:

« Porn Star Sues Josh Duggar For Sexual Assault
Watch: Bill Maher Calls Donald Trump ‘Fake Mussolini’ »Trump Goes Full Nazi: Wants To Close Mosques, Make Muslims Wear IDNovember 19, 2015 by Michael Stone 10 Comments

Fascism rising: GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump fans Republican hysteria and America’s growing fear of Muslims after the massacre in Paris.

According to a recent interview, the GOP presidential front runner said he is open to registering U.S. Muslims in a database or giving them special identification identifying their faith, something Nazi Germany did to Jewish citizens leading up to the holocaust (Hitler’s Third Reich required Jews to wear a yellow badge resembling the Star of David).

Yahoo News asked Trump whether the level of tracking he was proposing might require registering Muslims in a database or giving them a form of special identification that noted their religion. Trump said he wouldn’t rule it out:

We’re going to have to — we’re going to have to look at a lot of things very closely. We’re going to have to look at the mosques. We’re going to have to look very, very carefully.

Earlier this week, during Tuesday night’s edition of Hannity on Fox News, Trump argued that authorities should close mosques in order to prevent an attack inside the U.S.

Explaining to Hannity why the U.S. must close mosques, Trump said:

Nobody wants to say this and nobody wants to shut down religious institutions or anything, but you know, you understand it. A lot of people understand it. We’re going to have no choice.

There’s absolutely no choice.

Politico reports that in a string of new radio ads announced Wednesday, Trump and his supporters talk tough about the candidate’s plan to strengthen the military and to defeat the Islamic State. In the new ads, Trump warns against allowing refugees from Syria into the country while pledging to “quickly and decisively bomb the hell out of ISIS.”

The bad new is that Trump’s bellicose flirtations with fascism is working. The Hill reports that according to most of the polls released in the aftermath of the Paris terrorist attacks, Trump has gained political strength.

As for Trump’s over the top anti-Muslim rhetoric, this is nothing new. Trump was calling for the closure of mosques back in October, long before the terrorist attacks in Paris.

Bottom line: Many Republicans are angry, frightened, and dumb. And so far Trump has proven to be a master at manipulating that fear, anger, and stupidity to his own political advantage.

“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.”

– Anonymous

(Image via Twitter)

Filed Under: Islam, Politics 10 Comments

Related posts from Progressive Secular Humanist:Bernie Sanders Reaffirms Humanist Stance At Democratic Town HallMississippi Governor Declares April ‘Confederate Heritage Month’Pope Francis: Donald Trump ‘Is Not Christian’ State Sponsored Discrimination: Georgia Passes Religious Freedom Bill « Porn Star Sues Josh Duggar For Sexual Assault
Watch: Bill Maher Calls Donald Trump ‘Fake Mussolini’ »Subscribe by email to Progressive Secular Humanist Follow Progressive Secular Humanist!Popular at Patheos Atheist Obama eliminates “abstinence only” education from federal budget Obama Removes All Funding For ‘Abstinence-Only’ Sex Education Ted Cruz: A Liberal Supreme Court Would Mean “Sandblasting” Religious Symbols Off Veterans’ Graves Obama’s 2017 budget removes ALL funding for abstinence-only education.Categories CategoriesArchives Archives Trending at Patheos AtheistRecent Comments
AB
ABasquefanPro2,549 posts
25 Feb 2016, 22:13
#28
25 Feb 2016, 22:13#28
 killing whites isn’t just false — it’s neo-Nazi propaganda Travis Gettys
23 Nov 2015 at 07:40 ET                    FacebookTwitterMore German Faith Movement logo (Twitter) Don't miss stories. Follow Raw Story!

Donald Trump capped a week that found him flirting with fascism by sharing a blatantly false, racist graphic that apparently originated with a Hitler-admiring neo-Nazi.

The Republican presidential frontrunner tweeted an image Sunday afternoon that claimed 81 percent of white homicide victims are killed by blacks and 97 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other blacks.

The graphic cited the Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco as its source — although that does not exist and the statistics are, quite simply, made up.

In reality, the FBI shows that 82 percent of white homicide victims were killed by other white people and 15 percent of white homicide victims were killed by black people, and 91 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other black people.

So where did the image and the bogus statistics come from?

Blogger Charles Johnson, of Little Green Footballs, was unable to determine its source through a Google Image search or tineye.com — but he was able to find the earliest tweet using the graphic.

pic.twitter.com/vGXcO5xCgk

— Non Dildo'd Goyim (@CheesedBrit) November 22, 2015

The account’s avatar is a modified swastika used as the symbol of the neo-Nazi German Faith Movement, and the account profile expresses admiration for Adolf Hitler: “A detester of any kind of sick perverted dildo waving marxism and liberalism,we Should have listened to the Austrian chap with the little moustache.”

The image was posted on the conservative Sexy Patriot account shortly before Trump shared it.

There’s no indication Trump was aware the graphic seems to have originated with a neo-Nazi, but a quick Google search should have revealed the statistics as inaccurate — and its racist suggestions are plainly obvious.

Trump supporters beat up a Black Lives Matter protester Saturday in Birmingham, Alabama, and the GOP candidate said afterward that the man was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

The Republican repeated his call to closely monitor or even close down U.S. mosques to fight terrorism, and he refused to rule out creating a database of American Muslims and expressed openness to the possibility of requiring them to carry special ID.

This isn’t the first time Trump has tweeted Nazi propaganda on his official social media account.

Trump shared a campaign graphic, which he later deleted, that included an image of Nazi soldiers taken from a World War II re-enactment.

killing whites isn’t just false — it’s neo-Nazi propaganda Travis Gettys
23 Nov 2015 at 07:40 ET                    FacebookTwitterMore German Faith Movement logo (Twitter) Don't miss stories. Follow Raw Story!

Donald Trump capped a week that found him flirting with fascism by sharing a blatantly false, racist graphic that apparently originated with a Hitler-admiring neo-Nazi.

The Republican presidential frontrunner tweeted an image Sunday afternoon that claimed 81 percent of white homicide victims are killed by blacks and 97 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other blacks.

The graphic cited the Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco as its source — although that does not exist and the statistics are, quite simply, made up.

In reality, the FBI shows that 82 percent of white homicide victims were killed by other white people and 15 percent of white homicide victims were killed by black people, and 91 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other black people.

So where did the image and the bogus statistics come from?

Blogger Charles Johnson, of Little Green Footballs, was unable to determine its source through a Google Image search or tineye.com — but he was able to find the earliest tweet using the graphic.

pic.twitter.com/vGXcO5xCgk

— Non Dildo'd Goyim (@CheesedBrit) November 22, 2015

The account’s avatar is a modified swastika used as the symbol of the neo-Nazi German Faith Movement, and the account profile expresses admiration for Adolf Hitler: “A detester of any kind of sick perverted dildo waving marxism and liberalism,we Should have listened to the Austrian chap with the little moustache.”

The image was posted on the conservative Sexy Patriot account shortly before Trump shared it.

There’s no indication Trump was aware the graphic seems to have originated with a neo-Nazi, but a quick Google search should have revealed the statistics as inaccurate — and its racist suggestions are plainly obvious.

Trump supporters beat up a Black Lives Matter protester Saturday in Birmingham, Alabama, and the GOP candidate said afterward that the man was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

The Republican repeated his call to closely monitor or even close down U.S. mosques to fight terrorism, and he refused to rule out creating a database of American Muslims and expressed openness to the possibility of requiring them to carry special ID.

This isn’t the first time Trump has tweeted Nazi propaganda on his official social media account.

Trump shared a campaign graphic, which he later deleted, that included an image of Nazi soldiers taken from a World War II re-enactment.

killing whites isn’t just false — it’s neo-Nazi propaganda Travis Gettys
23 Nov 2015 at 07:40 ET                    FacebookTwitterMore German Faith Movement logo (Twitter) Don't miss stories. Follow Raw Story!

Donald Trump capped a week that found him flirting with fascism by sharing a blatantly false, racist graphic that apparently originated with a Hitler-admiring neo-Nazi.

The Republican presidential frontrunner tweeted an image Sunday afternoon that claimed 81 percent of white homicide victims are killed by blacks and 97 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other blacks.

The graphic cited the Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco as its source — although that does not exist and the statistics are, quite simply, made up.

In reality, the FBI shows that 82 percent of white homicide victims were killed by other white people and 15 percent of white homicide victims were killed by black people, and 91 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other black people.

So where did the image and the bogus statistics come from?

Blogger Charles Johnson, of Little Green Footballs, was unable to determine its source through a Google Image search or tineye.com — but he was able to find the earliest tweet using the graphic.

pic.twitter.com/vGXcO5xCgk

— Non Dildo'd Goyim (@CheesedBrit) November 22, 2015

The account’s avatar is a modified swastika used as the symbol of the neo-Nazi German Faith Movement, and the account profile expresses admiration for Adolf Hitler: “A detester of any kind of sick perverted dildo waving marxism and liberalism,we Should have listened to the Austrian chap with the little moustache.”

The image was posted on the conservative Sexy Patriot account shortly before Trump shared it.

There’s no indication Trump was aware the graphic seems to have originated with a neo-Nazi, but a quick Google search should have revealed the statistics as inaccurate — and its racist suggestions are plainly obvious.

Trump supporters beat up a Black Lives Matter protester Saturday in Birmingham, Alabama, and the GOP candidate said afterward that the man was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

The Republican repeated his call to closely monitor or even close down U.S. mosques to fight terrorism, and he refused to rule out creating a database of American Muslims and expressed openness to the possibility of requiring them to carry special ID.

This isn’t the first time Trump has tweeted Nazi propaganda on his official social media account.

Trump shared a campaign graphic, which he later deleted, that included an image of Nazi soldiers taken from a World War II re-enactment.

killing whites isn’t just false — it’s neo-Nazi propaganda Travis Gettys
23 Nov 2015 at 07:40 ET                    FacebookTwitterMore German Faith Movement logo (Twitter) Don't miss stories. Follow Raw Story!

Donald Trump capped a week that found him flirting with fascism by sharing a blatantly false, racist graphic that apparently originated with a Hitler-admiring neo-Nazi.

The Republican presidential frontrunner tweeted an image Sunday afternoon that claimed 81 percent of white homicide victims are killed by blacks and 97 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other blacks.

The graphic cited the Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco as its source — although that does not exist and the statistics are, quite simply, made up.

In reality, the FBI shows that 82 percent of white homicide victims were killed by other white people and 15 percent of white homicide victims were killed by black people, and 91 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other black people.

So where did the image and the bogus statistics come from?

Blogger Charles Johnson, of Little Green Footballs, was unable to determine its source through a Google Image search or tineye.com — but he was able to find the earliest tweet using the graphic.

pic.twitter.com/vGXcO5xCgk

— Non Dildo'd Goyim (@CheesedBrit) November 22, 2015

The account’s avatar is a modified swastika used as the symbol of the neo-Nazi German Faith Movement, and the account profile expresses admiration for Adolf Hitler: “A detester of any kind of sick perverted dildo waving marxism and liberalism,we Should have listened to the Austrian chap with the little moustache.”

The image was posted on the conservative Sexy Patriot account shortly before Trump shared it.

There’s no indication Trump was aware the graphic seems to have originated with a neo-Nazi, but a quick Google search should have revealed the statistics as inaccurate — and its racist suggestions are plainly obvious.

Trump supporters beat up a Black Lives Matter protester Saturday in Birmingham, Alabama, and the GOP candidate said afterward that the man was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

The Republican repeated his call to closely monitor or even close down U.S. mosques to fight terrorism, and he refused to rule out creating a database of American Muslims and expressed openness to the possibility of requiring them to carry special ID.

This isn’t the first time Trump has tweeted Nazi propaganda on his official social media account.

Trump shared a campaign graphic, which he later deleted, that included an image of Nazi soldiers taken from a World War II re-enactment.

killing whites isn’t just false — it’s neo-Nazi propaganda Travis Gettys
23 Nov 2015 at 07:40 ET                    FacebookTwitterMore German Faith Movement logo (Twitter) Don't miss stories. Follow Raw Story!

Donald Trump capped a week that found him flirting with fascism by sharing a blatantly false, racist graphic that apparently originated with a Hitler-admiring neo-Nazi.

The Republican presidential frontrunner tweeted an image Sunday afternoon that claimed 81 percent of white homicide victims are killed by blacks and 97 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other blacks.

The graphic cited the Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco as its source — although that does not exist and the statistics are, quite simply, made up.

In reality, the FBI shows that 82 percent of white homicide victims were killed by other white people and 15 percent of white homicide victims were killed by black people, and 91 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other black people.

So where did the image and the bogus statistics come from?

Blogger Charles Johnson, of Little Green Footballs, was unable to determine its source through a Google Image search or tineye.com — but he was able to find the earliest tweet using the graphic.

pic.twitter.com/vGXcO5xCgk

— Non Dildo'd Goyim (@CheesedBrit) November 22, 2015

The account’s avatar is a modified swastika used as the symbol of the neo-Nazi German Faith Movement, and the account profile expresses admiration for Adolf Hitler: “A detester of any kind of sick perverted dildo waving marxism and liberalism,we Should have listened to the Austrian chap with the little moustache.”

The image was posted on the conservative Sexy Patriot account shortly before Trump shared it.

There’s no indication Trump was aware the graphic seems to have originated with a neo-Nazi, but a quick Google search should have revealed the statistics as inaccurate — and its racist suggestions are plainly obvious.

Trump supporters beat up a Black Lives Matter protester Saturday in Birmingham, Alabama, and the GOP candidate said afterward that the man was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

The Republican repeated his call to closely monitor or even close down U.S. mosques to fight terrorism, and he refused to rule out creating a database of American Muslims and expressed openness to the possibility of requiring them to carry special ID.

This isn’t the first time Trump has tweeted Nazi propaganda on his official social media account.

Trump shared a campaign graphic, which he later deleted, that included an image of Nazi soldiers taken from a World War II re-enactment.

killing whites isn’t just false — it’s neo-Nazi propaganda Travis Gettys
23 Nov 2015 at 07:40 ET                    FacebookTwitterMore German Faith Movement logo (Twitter) Don't miss stories. Follow Raw Story!

Donald Trump capped a week that found him flirting with fascism by sharing a blatantly false, racist graphic that apparently originated with a Hitler-admiring neo-Nazi.

The Republican presidential frontrunner tweeted an image Sunday afternoon that claimed 81 percent of white homicide victims are killed by blacks and 97 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other blacks.

The graphic cited the Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco as its source — although that does not exist and the statistics are, quite simply, made up.

In reality, the FBI shows that 82 percent of white homicide victims were killed by other white people and 15 percent of white homicide victims were killed by black people, and 91 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other black people.

So where did the image and the bogus statistics come from?

Blogger Charles Johnson, of Little Green Footballs, was unable to determine its source through a Google Image search or tineye.com — but he was able to find the earliest tweet using the graphic.

pic.twitter.com/vGXcO5xCgk

— Non Dildo'd Goyim (@CheesedBrit) November 22, 2015

The account’s avatar is a modified swastika used as the symbol of the neo-Nazi German Faith Movement, and the account profile expresses admiration for Adolf Hitler: “A detester of any kind of sick perverted dildo waving marxism and liberalism,we Should have listened to the Austrian chap with the little moustache.”

The image was posted on the conservative Sexy Patriot account shortly before Trump shared it.

There’s no indication Trump was aware the graphic seems to have originated with a neo-Nazi, but a quick Google search should have revealed the statistics as inaccurate — and its racist suggestions are plainly obvious.

Trump supporters beat up a Black Lives Matter protester Saturday in Birmingham, Alabama, and the GOP candidate said afterward that the man was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

The Republican repeated his call to closely monitor or even close down U.S. mosques to fight terrorism, and he refused to rule out creating a database of American Muslims and expressed openness to the possibility of requiring them to carry special ID.

This isn’t the first time Trump has tweeted Nazi propaganda on his official social media account.

Trump shared a campaign graphic, which he later deleted, that included an image of Nazi soldiers taken from a World War II re-enactment.

AB
ABasquefanPro2,549 posts
25 Feb 2016, 22:14
#29
25 Feb 2016, 22:14#29
 That racist Trump tweet about blacks killing whites isn’t just false — it’s neo-Nazi propaganda Travis Gettys
23 Nov 2015 at 07:40 ET                    FacebookTwitterMore German Faith Movement logo (Twitter) Don't miss stories. Follow Raw Story!

Donald Trump capped a week that found him flirting with fascism by sharing a blatantly false, racist graphic that apparently originated with a Hitler-admiring neo-Nazi.

The Republican presidential frontrunner tweeted an image Sunday afternoon that claimed 81 percent of white homicide victims are killed by blacks and 97 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other blacks.

The graphic cited the Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco as its source — although that does not exist and the statistics are, quite simply, made up.

In reality, the FBI shows that 82 percent of white homicide victims were killed by other white people and 15 percent of white homicide victims were killed by black people, and 91 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other black people.

So where did the image and the bogus statistics come from?

Blogger Charles Johnson, of Little Green Footballs, was unable to determine its source through a Google Image search or tineye.com — but he was able to find the earliest tweet using the graphic.

pic.twitter.com/vGXcO5xCgk

— Non Dildo'd Goyim (@CheesedBrit) November 22, 2015

The account’s avatar is a modified swastika used as the symbol of the neo-Nazi German Faith Movement, and the account profile expresses admiration for Adolf Hitler: “A detester of any kind of sick perverted dildo waving marxism and liberalism,we Should have listened to the Austrian chap with the little moustache.”

The image was posted on the conservative Sexy Patriot account shortly before Trump shared it.

There’s no indication Trump was aware the graphic seems to have originated with a neo-Nazi, but a quick Google search should have revealed the statistics as inaccurate — and its racist suggestions are plainly obvious.

Trump supporters beat up a Black Lives Matter protester Saturday in Birmingham, Alabama, and the GOP candidate said afterward that the man was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

The Republican repeated his call to closely monitor or even close down U.S. mosques to fight terrorism, and he refused to rule out creating a database of American Muslims and expressed openness to the possibility of requiring them to carry special ID.

This isn’t the first time Trump has tweeted Nazi propaganda on his official social media account.

Trump shared a campaign graphic, which he later deleted, that included an image of Nazi soldiers taken from a World War II re-enactment.

That racist Trump tweet about blacks killing whites isn’t just false — it’s neo-Nazi propaganda Travis Gettys
23 Nov 2015 at 07:40 ET                    FacebookTwitterMore German Faith Movement logo (Twitter) Don't miss stories. Follow Raw Story!

Donald Trump capped a week that found him flirting with fascism by sharing a blatantly false, racist graphic that apparently originated with a Hitler-admiring neo-Nazi.

The Republican presidential frontrunner tweeted an image Sunday afternoon that claimed 81 percent of white homicide victims are killed by blacks and 97 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other blacks.

The graphic cited the Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco as its source — although that does not exist and the statistics are, quite simply, made up.

In reality, the FBI shows that 82 percent of white homicide victims were killed by other white people and 15 percent of white homicide victims were killed by black people, and 91 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other black people.

So where did the image and the bogus statistics come from?

Blogger Charles Johnson, of Little Green Footballs, was unable to determine its source through a Google Image search or tineye.com — but he was able to find the earliest tweet using the graphic.

pic.twitter.com/vGXcO5xCgk

— Non Dildo'd Goyim (@CheesedBrit) November 22, 2015

The account’s avatar is a modified swastika used as the symbol of the neo-Nazi German Faith Movement, and the account profile expresses admiration for Adolf Hitler: “A detester of any kind of sick perverted dildo waving marxism and liberalism,we Should have listened to the Austrian chap with the little moustache.”

The image was posted on the conservative Sexy Patriot account shortly before Trump shared it.

There’s no indication Trump was aware the graphic seems to have originated with a neo-Nazi, but a quick Google search should have revealed the statistics as inaccurate — and its racist suggestions are plainly obvious.

Trump supporters beat up a Black Lives Matter protester Saturday in Birmingham, Alabama, and the GOP candidate said afterward that the man was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

The Republican repeated his call to closely monitor or even close down U.S. mosques to fight terrorism, and he refused to rule out creating a database of American Muslims and expressed openness to the possibility of requiring them to carry special ID.

This isn’t the first time Trump has tweeted Nazi propaganda on his official social media account.

Trump shared a campaign graphic, which he later deleted, that included an image of Nazi soldiers taken from a World War II re-enactment.

That racist Trump tweet about blacks killing whites isn’t just false — it’s neo-Nazi propaganda Travis Gettys
23 Nov 2015 at 07:40 ET                    FacebookTwitterMore German Faith Movement logo (Twitter) Don't miss stories. Follow Raw Story!

Donald Trump capped a week that found him flirting with fascism by sharing a blatantly false, racist graphic that apparently originated with a Hitler-admiring neo-Nazi.

The Republican presidential frontrunner tweeted an image Sunday afternoon that claimed 81 percent of white homicide victims are killed by blacks and 97 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other blacks.

The graphic cited the Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco as its source — although that does not exist and the statistics are, quite simply, made up.

In reality, the FBI shows that 82 percent of white homicide victims were killed by other white people and 15 percent of white homicide victims were killed by black people, and 91 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other black people.

So where did the image and the bogus statistics come from?

Blogger Charles Johnson, of Little Green Footballs, was unable to determine its source through a Google Image search or tineye.com — but he was able to find the earliest tweet using the graphic.

pic.twitter.com/vGXcO5xCgk

— Non Dildo'd Goyim (@CheesedBrit) November 22, 2015

The account’s avatar is a modified swastika used as the symbol of the neo-Nazi German Faith Movement, and the account profile expresses admiration for Adolf Hitler: “A detester of any kind of sick perverted dildo waving marxism and liberalism,we Should have listened to the Austrian chap with the little moustache.”

The image was posted on the conservative Sexy Patriot account shortly before Trump shared it.

There’s no indication Trump was aware the graphic seems to have originated with a neo-Nazi, but a quick Google search should have revealed the statistics as inaccurate — and its racist suggestions are plainly obvious.

Trump supporters beat up a Black Lives Matter protester Saturday in Birmingham, Alabama, and the GOP candidate said afterward that the man was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

The Republican repeated his call to closely monitor or even close down U.S. mosques to fight terrorism, and he refused to rule out creating a database of American Muslims and expressed openness to the possibility of requiring them to carry special ID.

This isn’t the first time Trump has tweeted Nazi propaganda on his official social media account.

Trump shared a campaign graphic, which he later deleted, that included an image of Nazi soldiers taken from a World War II re-enactment.

That racist Trump tweet about blacks killing whites isn’t just false — it’s neo-Nazi propaganda Travis Gettys
23 Nov 2015 at 07:40 ET                    FacebookTwitterMore German Faith Movement logo (Twitter) Don't miss stories. Follow Raw Story!

Donald Trump capped a week that found him flirting with fascism by sharing a blatantly false, racist graphic that apparently originated with a Hitler-admiring neo-Nazi.

The Republican presidential frontrunner tweeted an image Sunday afternoon that claimed 81 percent of white homicide victims are killed by blacks and 97 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other blacks.

The graphic cited the Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco as its source — although that does not exist and the statistics are, quite simply, made up.

In reality, the FBI shows that 82 percent of white homicide victims were killed by other white people and 15 percent of white homicide victims were killed by black people, and 91 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other black people.

So where did the image and the bogus statistics come from?

Blogger Charles Johnson, of Little Green Footballs, was unable to determine its source through a Google Image search or tineye.com — but he was able to find the earliest tweet using the graphic.

pic.twitter.com/vGXcO5xCgk

— Non Dildo'd Goyim (@CheesedBrit) November 22, 2015

The account’s avatar is a modified swastika used as the symbol of the neo-Nazi German Faith Movement, and the account profile expresses admiration for Adolf Hitler: “A detester of any kind of sick perverted dildo waving marxism and liberalism,we Should have listened to the Austrian chap with the little moustache.”

The image was posted on the conservative Sexy Patriot account shortly before Trump shared it.

There’s no indication Trump was aware the graphic seems to have originated with a neo-Nazi, but a quick Google search should have revealed the statistics as inaccurate — and its racist suggestions are plainly obvious.

Trump supporters beat up a Black Lives Matter protester Saturday in Birmingham, Alabama, and the GOP candidate said afterward that the man was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

The Republican repeated his call to closely monitor or even close down U.S. mosques to fight terrorism, and he refused to rule out creating a database of American Muslims and expressed openness to the possibility of requiring them to carry special ID.

This isn’t the first time Trump has tweeted Nazi propaganda on his official social media account.

Trump shared a campaign graphic, which he later deleted, that included an image of Nazi soldiers taken from a World War II re-enactment.

That racist Trump tweet about blacks killing whites isn’t just false — it’s neo-Nazi propaganda Travis Gettys
23 Nov 2015 at 07:40 ET                    FacebookTwitterMore German Faith Movement logo (Twitter) Don't miss stories. Follow Raw Story!

Donald Trump capped a week that found him flirting with fascism by sharing a blatantly false, racist graphic that apparently originated with a Hitler-admiring neo-Nazi.

The Republican presidential frontrunner tweeted an image Sunday afternoon that claimed 81 percent of white homicide victims are killed by blacks and 97 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other blacks.

The graphic cited the Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco as its source — although that does not exist and the statistics are, quite simply, made up.

In reality, the FBI shows that 82 percent of white homicide victims were killed by other white people and 15 percent of white homicide victims were killed by black people, and 91 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other black people.

So where did the image and the bogus statistics come from?

Blogger Charles Johnson, of Little Green Footballs, was unable to determine its source through a Google Image search or tineye.com — but he was able to find the earliest tweet using the graphic.

pic.twitter.com/vGXcO5xCgk

— Non Dildo'd Goyim (@CheesedBrit) November 22, 2015

The account’s avatar is a modified swastika used as the symbol of the neo-Nazi German Faith Movement, and the account profile expresses admiration for Adolf Hitler: “A detester of any kind of sick perverted dildo waving marxism and liberalism,we Should have listened to the Austrian chap with the little moustache.”

The image was posted on the conservative Sexy Patriot account shortly before Trump shared it.

There’s no indication Trump was aware the graphic seems to have originated with a neo-Nazi, but a quick Google search should have revealed the statistics as inaccurate — and its racist suggestions are plainly obvious.

Trump supporters beat up a Black Lives Matter protester Saturday in Birmingham, Alabama, and the GOP candidate said afterward that the man was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

The Republican repeated his call to closely monitor or even close down U.S. mosques to fight terrorism, and he refused to rule out creating a database of American Muslims and expressed openness to the possibility of requiring them to carry special ID.

This isn’t the first time Trump has tweeted Nazi propaganda on his official social media account.

Trump shared a campaign graphic, which he later deleted, that included an image of Nazi soldiers taken from a World War II re-enactment.

That racist Trump tweet about blacks killing whites isn’t just false — it’s neo-Nazi propaganda Travis Gettys
23 Nov 2015 at 07:40 ET                    FacebookTwitterMore German Faith Movement logo (Twitter) Don't miss stories. Follow Raw Story!

Donald Trump capped a week that found him flirting with fascism by sharing a blatantly false, racist graphic that apparently originated with a Hitler-admiring neo-Nazi.

The Republican presidential frontrunner tweeted an image Sunday afternoon that claimed 81 percent of white homicide victims are killed by blacks and 97 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other blacks.

The graphic cited the Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco as its source — although that does not exist and the statistics are, quite simply, made up.

In reality, the FBI shows that 82 percent of white homicide victims were killed by other white people and 15 percent of white homicide victims were killed by black people, and 91 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other black people.

So where did the image and the bogus statistics come from?

Blogger Charles Johnson, of Little Green Footballs, was unable to determine its source through a Google Image search or tineye.com — but he was able to find the earliest tweet using the graphic.

pic.twitter.com/vGXcO5xCgk

— Non Dildo'd Goyim (@CheesedBrit) November 22, 2015

The account’s avatar is a modified swastika used as the symbol of the neo-Nazi German Faith Movement, and the account profile expresses admiration for Adolf Hitler: “A detester of any kind of sick perverted dildo waving marxism and liberalism,we Should have listened to the Austrian chap with the little moustache.”

The image was posted on the conservative Sexy Patriot account shortly before Trump shared it.

There’s no indication Trump was aware the graphic seems to have originated with a neo-Nazi, but a quick Google search should have revealed the statistics as inaccurate — and its racist suggestions are plainly obvious.

Trump supporters beat up a Black Lives Matter protester Saturday in Birmingham, Alabama, and the GOP candidate said afterward that the man was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

The Republican repeated his call to closely monitor or even close down U.S. mosques to fight terrorism, and he refused to rule out creating a database of American Muslims and expressed openness to the possibility of requiring them to carry special ID.

This isn’t the first time Trump has tweeted Nazi propaganda on his official social media account.

Trump shared a campaign graphic, which he later deleted, that included an image of Nazi soldiers taken from a World War II re-enactment.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
25 Feb 2016, 22:26
#30
25 Feb 2016, 22:26#30
 ab ass arent you late for you SS meeting.
Given how muslims behave they will be required to do the same in Europe if they somehow avoid deport ation. Their welcome has turned to revulsion.I published info showing CAIR links to terror groups.Trump will have these guys under the spotlight and rightly so. Its a big reason his appeal is growing.No sane person wants sharia law in their country. SEND ALL MUSLIMS BACK TO MUSLIM LANDs NOW.Those Spaniards should ship you out to islamic state. You would feel much more at home there ab ass. Can practise your nazi inclinations to your hearts content. beheadings raping of women etc etc etc.If you dont like my thread dont visit it you crazy coot. Squealing like a stuck pig all over the board. Bwahahhahahahahahaha what a performance!!!
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
29 Feb 2016, 08:36
#31
29 Feb 2016, 08:36#31
The END of Rubio. Th his will sink the slimy twit! MADISON, Alabama— Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Council President Chris Crane addressed 
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)79%’s conduct at Donald Trump’s Sunday rally at Madison City Stadium. Crane’s address came just moments before the news broke that Trump had earned one of the most coveted endorsements in the conservative movement—the endorsement of Alabama Senator Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL)80%.

During his speech, Crane detailed how Rubio’s immigration plan was “a public safety and national security nightmare.”

“It’s as if the criminals wrote it themselves,” Crane said—warning that the crowd that it is a bill “you will see again, a bill that will pass if Sen. Rubio is elected as President of the United States.”

Crane is the national spokesman of approximately 5,800 ICE officers responsible for interior enforcement in all 50 states and U.S. territories. He is an ICE officer of 13 years, a former U.S. marine, a lifetime member of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, and lifetime member of the American Legion. Sessions has called Crane “an American hero” for his efforts to expose immigration corruption. In 2012, Crane and nine of his fellow officers sued President Obama in an effort to stop Obama’s first lawless executive amnesty.

Crane told the audience: “In 2013, we aligned with other law enforcement organizations to include approximately 150 sheriffs around the country and we linked up with some Congressional leaders like Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions so we could defeat the Gang of Eight Marco Rubio amnesty bill, perhaps the worst immigration bill our country has never seen. A bill that you will see again, a bill that will pass if Sen. Rubio is elected as President of the United States.”

The crowd booed wildly at the mention of a President Rubio.

“Very quickly I want to run through a few of the highlights of the Marco Rubio Gang of Eight bill for you, so that to give us a sense of what we can look forward to should Rubio take the presidency,” Crane explained. “Senator Rubio’s Gang of Eight bill provides amnesty for almost everyone illegally in the United States. It included special provisions to protect members of violent street gangs, some sex offenders, aliens convicted of assault and assault of police offenders, criminals convicted of theft, identity theft, vehicular homicide, domestic violence, the list goes on and on.

“Sen. Rubio’s bill eliminates the current enhancements and punishments that we have for aggravated felons. It requires federal agencies like ICE to ignore state convictions for aliens smuggling and human trafficking… This bill is a public safety and national security nightmare. It’s as if the criminals wrote it themselves.”

The crowd began to jeer loudly.

“But most alarming perhaps is the fact that there is no border patrol plan, no border security, no nothing to this entire Marco Rubio border security plan,” Crane continued. “There’s nothing. In fact, the amnesty comes first. We know exactly what’s going to happen. I’m going to predict it right now on stage. The minute we do Rubio’s immigration plan we’re going to have millions more illegal aliens flooding across our border overnight.”

The crowd again began to boo Rubio.

Crane continued:

Rubio said on Friday that the only reason he wrote and so adamantly supported this immigration bill with the rest of the Gang of Eight was because it was the best he could do at the time— the time being 2013 Democratic-run Senate. But that’s just another Marco Rubio spin and lie. Marco Rubio did not have to support any bill. There was no gun to his head. We already have immigration laws on the books. We just need to enforce them. Marco Rubio did not have to support amnesty without border security, and he certainly didn’t have to support provisions to protect criminals and immigration violators. Marco Rubio supported this bill because he had his hands deep in the pockets of wealthy special interest groups. The welfare of America was not a concern for Marco Rubio.

But America should know also that as Marco Rubio worked with pro-amnesty groups and big business and the Obama administration to develop the immigration  bill he actively excluded law enforcement from the bill’s development. By excluding input from the men and women that worked on the frontline of our immigration crisis… he excluded input from Americans who are in the best position to identify and come up with solutions who are the in best position to identify our nation’s weaknesses and come up with solutions. Marco Rubio excluded law enforcement because (1) we had no dirty money for his presidential campaign and (2) because he knew law enforcement would tell the American public exactly what his Gang of Eight bill was: an amnesty bill supported by Barack Obama that threatened public safety and national security. A bill that fixes none of our current immigration problems but serves only to make them worse.

Crane added that Rubio and his colleagues pushing the bill “treated law enforcement like trash—not only was law enforcement not invited to provide input in his Gang of Eight bill while amnesty groups were, but when law enforcement reached out to Marco Rubio expressing concerns about the bill, he completely ignored us.”

Only as public pressure mounted against Rubio to meet with law enforcement did he finally relinquish and agree to meet, during the meeting strong concerns about the bill’s impact on public safety and national security were discussed, Crane said. “Rubio committed to make many significant changes to the bill to address these safety and security concerns, but in the end it was all just a big lie… None of the changes Rubio committed to make were included. It was all just more dirty Washington D.C. politics with Marco Rubio.”

Crane then detailed how he and several sheriffs attended a Gang of Eight press conference. During that press event, Rubio oversaw as Crane was ejected from the room for trying to ask a question on behalf of law enforcement.

The crowd again booed loudly.

“I will never forget how Sen. Rubio looked directly at me [as police escorted me out],” Crane said. “As a military veteran, a law enforcement officer, an American citizen, who was simply trying to ask a U.S. senator a question at a public event in a building of Congress—the House of the People no less. How could any U.S. Senator think it was the right thing to have a U.S. citizen escorted out by police, but out of that group of Senators, Sen. Marco Rubio knew exactly who I was. He looked directly at me and did nothing to stop it. He could have stepped up the mic and yelled, ‘Stop. Let the man speak.’ But he didn’t.”

The crowd began to boo, one member yelled audible, “He wears high-heeled boots!” at which the crowd laughed.

“So Marco Rubio in his Gang of Eight immigration bill fought for members of violent street gangs, sex offenders and millions of foreign nationals who have violated our country’s immigration laws, but he couldn’t step up to the mic say a word to protect the free speech, support the free speech of a U.S. citizen, a veteran, a law enforcement officer,” Crane said. “This is not the character of a Commander in Chief. I am here today to urge everyone of you and everyone in Alabama and everyone American, simply: Please do not vote for Senator Marco Rubio for President of the United States.”

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
29 Feb 2016, 08:59
#32
29 Feb 2016, 08:59#32
 F o k ... never ending horsesh!t.
Seems Beandip specializes in it.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
29 Feb 2016, 12:51
#33
29 Feb 2016, 12:51#33
Birdbrain nobody asked you to read this. Some here are interested even if you are not. Got it.The USA election and Brexit will decide the fate of the world. Failures to win the presidency by Trump means an acceleration into the one world government ultimately governed by anti christ. The battle lines between nationalists and the global elite have been drawn.Europe will run to the benefit of the globalists and hardship of the people. But resistance from all quarters is rising rapidly. In the USa Trump has made great strides.There never has been a more vital time. cc you must be fast asleep and a dope of note to not understand this. Man you do get some really thick oaks!!!
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
29 Feb 2016, 13:07
#34
29 Feb 2016, 13:07#34
 Poor Marco gets blasted by Christie. Rubio is clealrya very lazy twit!

At a Saturday Donald Trump rally in Bentonville, AR, Gov. Chris Christie (R-NJ) put 

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)79% on blast over his Senate attendance.

According to Christie, Rubio “doesn’t work much at all,” and missed “60 percent of all the meetings in the foreign relations committee,” “85 percent of the meetings as Senator” and “80 percent of the meetings of the commerce committee.”

“Since he’s been in the Senate, he’s missed 68 percent of all of the committee meetings he’s been assigned to,” Christie said. “Hey Marco, show up for work for the American people!”

He added, “One message to Sen. Rubio, wherever you are right now – unlike the United States Senate, President of the United States is not a no-show job, so you’re not qualified.”

Christie went on to promote Trump’s ability to create jobs, saying he is the “only person in this race that’s created jobs.”

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
29 Feb 2016, 13:27
#35
29 Feb 2016, 13:27#35
 With Britons due to decide on June 23 whether to exit the EU or remain tied to Brussels, there are growing signs other voters across the continent are craving their own chance to leave the crisis-stricken union.

In a new opinion poll in the Netherlands, a majority of voters said they backed the country having its own in/out referendum on EU membership, similar to the UK vote.

And Czech Republic prime minister Bohuslav Sobotka has warned if Britons do decide to leave the EU, a ‘Czexit’ could follow.

RELATED ARTICLES

In the Dutch poll, more than half (53 per cent) supported an in/out vote with 44 per cent opposed and four per cent unsure.

In the survey, conducted by pollster and entrepreneur Maurice de Hond, voters were also asked how they would vote in such an in/out referendum.

Only slightly more (44 per cent) wanted to remain in the EU than those who said they would opt to leave the bloc (43 per cent), while 13 per cent said they ‘didn’t know’.

Interestingly, more Dutch voters (48 per cent) said they didn’t want Britain to exit the EU this summer than wanted their own country to stay in the bloc.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news