FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Bunnies!

Bunnies!

Started by Rooinek30 REPLIES952 VIEWS· 14 Mar 2016, 09:42
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
14 Mar 2016, 09:42
#1
14 Mar 2016, 09:42#1
Well done Sharks!

The sound of Blowhards bleating about the penalty try only makes the Sharks win over the Hapless Stompies that much sweeter.

What a pity the Sharks only play their Bunnies once this season!

The Hapless Stompies may well finish the season above the Sharks on the final table because they've been given the soft draw . . . but there's no more question who is the better team!

Bunnies . . . Again!!!
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
14 Mar 2016, 09:56
#2
14 Mar 2016, 09:56#2
 Rooinek
The following from News 24 should put the matter to rest:-

Marius Jonker insists his decision to award the Sharks a penalty try in their game against the Stormers was "100%" the right call.


The Sharks were awarded a controversial penalty try early in the second half of the match at Newlands after Jonker, the television match official (TMO), deemed that Stormers flank Siya Kolisi kicked the ball out of Sharks scrumhalf Cobus Reinach’s hands as he attempted to dot the ball down.


Kolisi was also sent to the sin-bin for 10 minutes.


Watching the replays of the incident, it appears as though it was not Kolisi’s intention of kicking the ball out of Reinach’s grasp.  However, according to Jonker, it’s irrelevant whether it was Kolisi's intention or not.

“The rule does not deal with what a player’s intention was. If his foot did not make contact with the ball, then a try would in all likelihood have been scored. You also can’t award a penalty try if the incident does not warrant a yellow card,” Jonker told Netwerk24.

According to Law 10.2 (a), “A penalty try must be awarded if the offence prevents a try that would probably otherwise have been scored. A player who prevents a try being scored through foul play must either be cautioned and temporarily suspended or sent off.”


The Stormers can nevertheless feel aggrieved by what occurred, as Reinach transgressed in the build-up to the try when he kicked the ball back into a ruck, but it was not spotted by Kiwi referee Mike Fraser."


The problem is that intention is not a defined norm in rugby.  How many times in games  does it happens that a player is taken out in the air when two players go for a ball in teh air and the one player is penalized and nearly always carded - and the plea always is that it is without intent.   if intent becomes a norm in rugby they might as well withdraw all rules since all players will claim lack of intent to commit offences and nothing will be blown up as illegal.   

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
14 Mar 2016, 10:32
#3
14 Mar 2016, 10:32#3
 "The Stormers can nevertheless feel aggrieved by what occurred, as Reinach transgressed in the build-up to the try when he kicked the ball back into a ruck, but it was not spotted by Kiwi referee Mike Fraser."So we have a silly law and a missed event by the hapless kiwi ref.
Ma n this gets funnier by the minute with ou rooitwit joining in to make a a complete twit of himself yet again.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
14 Mar 2016, 10:34
#4
14 Mar 2016, 10:34#4
 Where was kolisi supposed to put his feet the commentators fairly asked. 
A simple answer will do.Haha hahahahahahaha
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
14 Mar 2016, 10:35
#5
14 Mar 2016, 10:35#5
 The laws of rugby should be interpreted in a reasonable manner 
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
14 Mar 2016, 10:51
#6
14 Mar 2016, 10:51#6
"Sniff . . . blubber . . . it's all so unfair . . . boohoohoo . . ."

LMAO! Music to my ears!

BUNNIES!!!
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
14 Mar 2016, 11:11
#7
14 Mar 2016, 11:11#7
 Beeno
Don't be silly - no player goes into that kind of situation with the feet first - he is supposed to stop a try being scored and he must go into the situation with his hands not his feet .   The moment the foot gets into the picture it is obvious that an offence becomes a real possibility.
The Stormers lost the game because of a seriously deficient backline - their half-backs is a joke in bad taste and De Jongh, Leyds and even Kolbe is no better.   The Brumbies will have an easy win against them on Saturday because of that deficiency. 
The problem remains that Fleck has not solved the Stormers backline problems with his continued usage of the midgets in the backline and the loss of Du Preez at 10 - end of story.        
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
14 Mar 2016, 11:15
#8
14 Mar 2016, 11:15#8
Also, Marcell Coetzee made Skulk his squealing little prison bride .
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
14 Mar 2016, 11:33
#9
14 Mar 2016, 11:33#9
 Schalk now had an average game against the Kings and two below par games against the Cheetahs and the Sharks - in the latter game he was comprehensively outplayed by the Sharks loosies.   He is not the Schalk Burger he used to be.  
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
14 Mar 2016, 11:41
#10
14 Mar 2016, 11:41#10
 Ou maaaikie I suppose conventionally I should be impressed by the way you parrot me but telling a guy what he has said well before the match shows you have little idea regarding what you read.
Ou rooitwit enjoying  his childish moment. Who can begrudge the lush a moments happininess!


CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
14 Mar 2016, 11:45
#11
14 Mar 2016, 11:45#11
 Beeno
I said the Stormers lost their game against the Sharks because of a seriously deficient backline already yesterday before you wrote anything.  So I did not copy you - it could be safely assumed that you copied me in fact.  
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
14 Mar 2016, 11:51
#12
14 Mar 2016, 11:51#12
 I wrote this before the season started. wake up ou maaaikie you are more out of touch than that 19th century dinosaur rooitwit wh ostill gives credence to evolution! I kid you not! !I was also the very first to point out the Stormers had gone too light in the backline many years ago 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
14 Mar 2016, 12:10
#13
14 Mar 2016, 12:10#13
Sorry Beeno
You are not the only one who claimed that deficiency of the Stormers throughout the years.  I think to call comments of a person as out-dated is absolute tripe - which is below what you normally contribute on the site.      
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
14 Mar 2016, 19:37
#14
14 Mar 2016, 19:37#14

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
15 Mar 2016, 11:47
#15
15 Mar 2016, 11:47#15
 Haaaaaaaaahahahahahahaa!!!
Bunnies???
Could not have described these closet queens any better.
Poefs ... the lot of them!!!!!!!!
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
15 Mar 2016, 12:36
#16
15 Mar 2016, 12:36#16
 ou clean cutie thinks when a  side loses to another because of a ref error they are bunnies , Bwhahahahahahahahahaha hilarious stuff from wee cc!
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
15 Mar 2016, 12:59
#17
15 Mar 2016, 12:59#17
History shows us we shouldn't underestimate bunniesWee stormers are not out of it yet.  PS Is that wee CC I see with the funny hat? 

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
15 Mar 2016, 13:32
#18
15 Mar 2016, 13:32#18
 Beeno
As a Stormer supporter I have to state clearly there was no referees error and the try was awarded in terms of the laws governing rugby - said to say.  
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
15 Mar 2016, 13:34
#19
15 Mar 2016, 13:34#19
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
15 Mar 2016, 13:38
#20
15 Mar 2016, 13:38#20
 I agree CleverMike, the call was based on the application of the law.
Poor wee Beeno has no credibility with his bleating about the ref. we have to consider the source.

He looks a little "Trump-crazy" so we should make allowances
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
15 Mar 2016, 15:58
#21
15 Mar 2016, 15:58#21
It's a question of the facts, nobody is disputing the law.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
15 Mar 2016, 17:05
#22
15 Mar 2016, 17:05#22

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
15 Mar 2016, 17:10
#23
15 Mar 2016, 17:10#23
 And a Sharks jersey for RooiAAS, this should bring a tear to his eye. Truth to tell though, he would need the short and portly size.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
15 Mar 2016, 19:58
#24
15 Mar 2016, 19:58#24
 Mozart
I suppose you went to vote for Trump already.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
15 Mar 2016, 22:17
#25
15 Mar 2016, 22:17#25
Once again you make a personal remark. That's another warning....tokkie
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
16 Mar 2016, 04:20
#26
16 Mar 2016, 04:20#26
 I've always expected better from Tokkie hence the reason I notified him years ago about the site.... I now know different and better. He seems on a comfort level with Rooitjies and the likes....guess we all make our choices.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
16 Mar 2016, 04:55
#27
16 Mar 2016, 04:55#27
 I haven't really....not for a long time.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
16 Mar 2016, 06:22
#28
16 Mar 2016, 06:22#28
 Mozart
Where is your sense of humour?
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
16 Mar 2016, 10:49
#29
16 Mar 2016, 10:49#29
Wee stormers will have a tough game on their hands when they take on the Brumbies.See link to article below:
Bunnies repeat?

If stormers had Duane & a few more like him they would have a shot at winning it but even though they are playing at home Brumbies could be make stormers bunnies for two weeks in a row.
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
16 Mar 2016, 14:42
#30
16 Mar 2016, 14:42#30
Say what you want but the Vissies are looking strong. On tmo the other night, Paulse said that Flekkie is a new coach, that it will take time for him to mould his side and that despite the loss fans should be positive because good things are happening at Newlands. Must say, I fully agree. Also, all our packs, aside from the Kings, are looking good. Few props here or there aren't up to standard but generally I'm satisfied with what I've seen this season.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
16 Mar 2016, 14:57
#31
16 Mar 2016, 14:57#31
 Plum
Better than last season with Mozart's geriatrics around.   
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news