When you want to be totally deluded stick with Moz
I was not interested in the Irish match since I wanted to watch the performance of Willemse in the WP game, because I believe he should be in the WC squad ahead of the total flop Frabns Steyn - which you obviously support all out.
From what I have seen in the highlights package the whole Irish team was poor in all aspects of the game and to single out one player in such a scenario is not wise, Looking purely at the stats stander as NOT he worst player of the lot. I think the main problem was in backline defense with -
* Kearney making 2 tackles missing 4;
* Lamour making 3 tackles missing 5; and
* Ringrose making 8 tackles missing 3
Of the 7 tries scored by England 4 of the 7 tries scored was by outside backs. and the poor defense stats given was the main reason for the tries being scored.
If one looks at the whole performance scenario the Irish defense was poor with the only players having reasonable stats in defense in the Irish team were in fact Van der Flier and Stander.- so as stated before singling out Stander for sole criticism is not a wise move on your pa rt. .
I am not saying he was good enough at all - the ratings for virtually all players were substandard. I would not target one player specifically in such an event.
Can't say I have ever seen Stander do much. Doesn't seem to have any X factor.
He was twice the loosie Alberts ever was - so that is why I wrote that time. However, Dave was the guy who always supported Stander,
“ However, Daver was the guy who always supported Stander, “
No danger of Ou Maaikie ever having a “I’m Spartacus”-moment.
I'm not for a moment saying Standers current form is good but he proven himself a great player for both club and country over a much longer time peroid than his dip in form. There is something wrong in the Ireland camp at the moment and the best player in the world would have looked poor gad you put him that Ireland team last Saturday.
Yes they peaked far to early.
Stav
Forget about trying to convince Mozart and co about anything else than their hatred of Stander will allow.
This has been going on for 6 years and their campaign against other SA players they hate has been on the go since 2013 - so to discuss player performances with them is like casting pearls to the swine.
I commented on the selections dimness
No Mozart
Go and look at the stats and terll me Steyn and Louw was up to standard. They were piss poor in the RC and then we have Mostert who did squat in Tight 5 performance in the two tests he played in, Lucky he will not be in the AB test - we have competitive locks in the squad,
Duplicate
Duplic ate
Dupl icate
Duplicate
If it weren't for his ridiculous Meyer hate, he'd have twigged that he and Rassie don't share the same vision for rugby. These failed predictions are just the speck on the tip of the iceberg. Many a hearty laugh is to be had watching it all play out.
Back to Stampy, it's good practice to observe the carries and the effect it has on the subsequent phase(s). This was where we could see the value of an Alberts. I haven't been following the 6N like I used to, not for many years, so I take Moz's word for it. This pretty much falls in line with what I have seen in the past three Irish tests that I've watched.
With a probable/possible quarter final against the Irish, their woeful performance was luvly-jubbly.
I saw aspects of that Irish performance that would trouble the Boks. The way they drive though contact, look for the offload, these are things the Boks can't handle like England. The lineout is another issue. They did look weak under the high ball, and the passive defence for the first England try was atrocious. Things they can rectify. I'll post more on this in a couple of days.
Sure your postings have always been jokes in thee extreme and I am looking forward to a really good joke here as well. No rugby knowledge like in your case is really funny. LOL
Why don't you post some material? It would make a change, maybe even make your posts a little interesting to read. Gosh, maybe even make it worth reading a second, third or fourth time, thereby adding value to your redundant quadruple posts.
No Mozart and AO
You two have both tried desperately to mislead other members by posting absolute trip e on site and then claim it is really what happened. To see your evaluations is like seeing a dream world of nightmares and fantasies.
I said really why both Steyn and Louw are sub-standard and that is ignored because you would rather have duds in the squad,
"Did not see the game but if CJ at 115kg is small then I’m a woman."
That explains a lot.
Mozart and AO
How many times have you been caught out lying about what actually happened in matches? False reports on what did happen is always in evidence in respect of players you dislike and protection of players you support.
That is why you "discover" incidents nobody else wrote about and then blame another player for it, Take a recent example the Goodhie try in the Wellington test. Vermeulen buggered up and the All Blacks counter attacked and then you found a reason to blame De Allende for the try being scored. Then you find an excuse for Habana in the case of the Montpellier try in 2007 test for being outpaced based on exactly the same circumstances,
Another famous incident even brought up recently by Mozart was he Perth Test in which Morne Steyn failed to find touch with a penalty line kick with Habana being off the field with a yellow card, Easy you do not blame Steyn for his bugger-up he made but the team not defending properly to prevent a subsequent try.
You also have the case where you two try and cover up a missed tackle by Mostert on Sanchez to try and blame Du Toit for the missed tackle, When you were caught out on Fat Fransie Steyn being out of the defensive line - even Pakie's photo proved it to be the case - you claimed it did not happen - he was at least three meters more out of line than Du Toit was. That type of outright lying is funny because you two were so blatantly easy to be caught out.
I can list a dozen of other things where you went bananas when caught out making statements, I said that Mostert was inadequate in line out jumping in the AB test and not used at all for that purpose in the subsequent Argentina test and you ignored it totally and said I was talking tripe. I previously wrote that Mostert on test level is incapable of setting up driving mauls and you two went ballistic iro the driving maul in the test last year as prove that I was wrong, The fact that Mostert failed in that driving maul was exposed when evaluating the situation and the fact that he maul started going forward when Du Toit took over the organizing of the maul and Vermeulen joined him in the effort was never mentioned by either of the two of you.
As to Stander - he had many good games for Munster and Ireland in the past - at least he is a test level loosie - unlike Mohoje and Alberts. Mozart's campaign against Stander started in 2012 and his nonsense has been on site regularly about the player - regularly using selective stats to prove some point or another - in this case ball carries only. But then - you in 2014 when Meyer's selection of Mohoje was criticized AO under a different user name said that he outplayed McCaw as a loosie.
I can go on case after case and point out literary dozens of posts b the two of you that was total misrepresentations of what actually happened in games - but that will not be necessary because you two with your falsifications are being regarded as farces on site and reasons for great enjoyment by all of us, LMAO
Duplicate
