CJ Stampkar anyone

No Mozart

I referred to what happened in the Montpellier case and said that what happened in that case your Arsehole in Chief wrote excuses for Habana being outpaced.  The weird thing is that he used excuses that can be based on exactly the same argument applicable to the Goodhue try case and De Allende's involvement on it.  

Your story about the latter case was BS from the start and it was clearly so laughable - the epitome of rugby fraud - that you seriously cannot expect an answer from me?   LMAO.

As to Stander - your campaign was never about facts - but about personal animosity against the player,   Anyway your interpretation of facts are really funny and normally false,  

"I can list a dozen of other things where you went bananas when caught out making statements"

Really? Reference one, brah. 

Dupl ication 

Sure easy - go to Louw at loosie letting the opposition flyhalf  ran through and sore a try  I then said that it is clear that when the same thing happened concerning Du Toit for which he had been vilified ever since, you would find an excuse for Louw.   The excuse then came back that there was no similarity between the two cases - while in fact the circumstances were exactly the same - with the only difference being that Du Toit was slightly wider out defending than Louw actually was,  An obvious lie and the reaction was what was expected from the two of you.   

In which test did this Louw concession occur? Do kindly point out where these bananas can be found, bevakashah. 

Last year against Argentina in Durban dimness  

No Mozart

Lies are no a basis for  "Muck had his head handed to him."

You were caught out badly and as you made the same move by quoting another thread on a similar basis - which exposed your lies again.  

Dave

I always believe Mozart is an enemy of the truth,  LMAO

Starting to think CJ ran over Mozarts cat before he left South Africa.