Classical Lambie
George Smith was average at best. He was lucky he did not get a yellow card - nearly with the constant penalties he gave away cost the Reds the game. Smith is in fact way passed it and gas become a penalty liability. He only made 5 tackles and missed one. That makes him a top loosie - dumbo?
Did you watch the game? How can you be so dumb you could not see what was happening.
And what about Smith's low tackle count and his missing a tackle as well. Smith is not a real asset anymore - he is dead average at this stage. Mo wonder his English Club contract was nit renewed.
I know your praise song would be forthcoming since Smith is 36 years old - the age psycho at work.
When the second Sharks try was awarded - he grabbed a Sharks player around the neck to take him out of the maul. The awarding of the try avoided another penalty and a certain yellow card.
In the end Smith slowed down massively - he is not the player he used to be. I think he should play as a blindsider - he is too slow to be an opensider.
So the three penalties is just forgotten - that is what nearly cost the Reds the match.
So the carries count - the unacceptable penalties and lo tackle count means zero. What a joke. The 6 was a better player on the day in any event.
By the way does stats only count when it fits your book and should otherwise be ignored?
Mozart: "No plank, I'm comparing his penalties..."
You cam also read that as Snith comceded three (3) and Remaich conceded three (3).
(Typos inserted on putpose, because that's how you seem to spell stuff... Maybe you umderstand it netter that way?!?!?)
And then you say "You remain the dumbest rugby assessor I have come across.", but also say "So thickness it is fair to compare the carries of a loosie in traffic with those of a scrummie."
Just analyse what you said there and realise that you destroyed your own argument.
The issue I discussed was the Smith myth conjured up by the dumbo. He is running after age again and found Smith to be another ideal player of his.
No plank - compare a scrummie's performance with that of a loosie is just about the dumbest comparison anyone can make - but then Mozart and his cronies are chronically dumb and knows nothing about rugby.
Same old, same old Yaaaaaawn!
Cape Town – It is less than ideal to start your campaign on the back foot, as the Sharks have just done in Super Rugby 2017, but they would also be silly to succumb to any unnecessarily drawn-out moping.
The men from Durban, who had held the lead in Brisbane’s subtropical warmth for generous periods, eventually succumbed 28-26 to the Reds in an engrossing enough fixture.
Considering that the Queenslanders notched four tries to two and that Quade Cooper’s place-kicking was more than a bit flaky at times, there could be no major reason to quibble with the outcome, although the Sharks did fully warrant their losing bonus point.(One Reds try appears to have been Dubious!!)
It is clear that the 2011 champions, in the doldrums in more recent times, have set their sights determinedly on revival and they may prove tough nuts for several other sides to crack at Suncorp Stadium this year.
So the Sharks – not especially used to game one of their roster being overseas -- still have every reason for optimism as they move onward to Canberra and the relative luxury of an eight-day turnaround to next Saturday’s second and final Australian tour match against the Brumbies, who have shed certain key characters and aren’t hugely tipped to be the force of old in 2017.
There was, after all, some contentiousness about the game-tilting try by James Tuttle in the 71stminute, with a suggestion of a forward pass in the build-up.
Then the tourists had a chance with three minutes left to snatch back the lead, only for their previously unerring flyhalf and captain Pat Lambie to drift a long, challenging penalty attempt wide to the right.
Apart from that moment, Lambie had been one of several Sharks players to look keen and sharp – a particularly healthy sign as his comeback games toward the end of last season after his horrible concussion against Ireland had seen him too often tentative and innocuous.
The 26-year-old skipper was a bastion of personal assuredness at No 10, showing a willingness not to be caught “in the pocket” too much, and also engaged shrewdly and alertly with referee Nick Briant whenever necessary.
It may not be quite a fait accompli, if Lambie continues his reawakening, that fit-again Handre Pollard of the Bulls simply waltzes back into the national shirt at all-important pivot in mid-year.
When the Sharks tackle the Brumbies, coach Robert du Preez may well urge his charges to try to boss territory and possession a bit more – they only got some 44 percent of the ball on Friday – as they were kept busy in the tackling department throughout.
Still, Lambie made a reasonable point in his immediate on-field interview afterwards that he didn’t feel late-game fatigue was a reason for the reverse; many of the Sharks players appear in a pretty sound state of conditioning.
There is some work yet to be done in making their lineout more clinical, and at critical times passes were irritatingly spilled as they tried to launch speedy hand-to-hand offensives.
But there was also decent collective zeal, industry and bright support play by the Sharks for generous periods, including a gutsy and creative showing from raw outside centre Lukhanyo Am.
He is not the biggest No 13 you will ever see, and that can be a drawback in defence near his own line, although he could hardly be faulted for commitment as muscular, Fijian-born opposite number Samu Kerevi barrelled over for two tries.(Oop anthoer small little oak not up to the big time?)
Locks Ruan Botha and Etienne Oosthuizen put in busy, physical shifts in the tight-loose, up against seasoned Wallabies in Rob Simmons and Kane Douglas, and Jean-Luc du Preez – apart from romping over for a breakaway try as early as the second minute – also demonstrated a decent engine and ceaseless leg-drive at blindside flank.
The Sharks may be nought-from-one, but there is plenty to work with …Is the good Doctor too pessimistic and criti cal one wonders


