Could the Abs defeat the Boks on soft, neutral fields

One area we have neglected is the "neutral fields" aspect of Moz' topic.

 

Not sure what that is all about, maybe something to do with the alkaline/acidity balance in the soil?

 

Beeno, any ideas mate?

 JW a neutral field is not a participant field, nor one on which Bryce Lawrence operates. 
Moolaa we are getting there. In 2003 the Bok coach had the lads preparing in the buff in mud pools.....trying to think like an AB!

 JW I have many ideas of course but content myself with sharing those which can be understood - or so one would think. The writing is on the wall kiwis just accept it gracefully and it wont be as painfu. Try to see you have worth in things besides rugby.
Dr Beeno dealing with oaks having very severe denialist conditions which are masking deep feelings of worthlessness and covering layers of hopelessness and dispair.A complex problem trying to solve all this in a rugby forum.Tell me your problems oaks lets pretend we have a cyber coach you can rest on and lets get to the bottom of this problm all kiwis appear to have. 
Given the gravity of the situation I am asking the esteemed Dr Moz to assist with some insights I am sure he will have.
However right now I am off to collect some stuff. Try and keep it together in the mean time.

Not sure I caught the drift of your rant Beeno, I was looking for the word "scoreboard" or won/lost record but I must have missed it.

 

Moz, don't tempt me so much mate, pigs in mud pools comes to mind but that would be too cruel, lol

 

What the heck are we going to do until February - insanity will reign supreme on this forum - some might say it always has 

Cloudy

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1117 RE: Could the Abs defeat the Boks on soft, neutral fields
November 26, 2013, 17:46:13 The vocabulary gets more and more hysterical.....IF.....WOULD HAVE....COULD HAVE.....and now we have words like  NEXT YEAR....WHEN.....you seem to have forgotten two very important words....NUMBER ONE.....and another two.....WORLD CHAMPIONS and another two......PRESENT TENSE.....Cloudy in her heart of hearts desperately trying to keep it real for those in severe denial.

In 2007, IF BARNES............... WOULD HAVE.............. COULD HAVE............ SHOULD HAVE.............FRANCE..........SOUTH AFRICA....... WOULD NOT HAVE............. SHOULD HAVE........... etc etc etc.

Behind all this bravado of the chest-beating sheepshaggers there lies a deep rooted fear that the 2015 RWC could end up like the 2007 one:

this is my college graduation photo, there has been some kind if mix up. 

 Hahahaha gee that ceradyne is original isnt he ? Its 6 years and we have moves on but not some of the wee bok fans eh ? How about some more bleating about the ref doing your lot in at the last RWC ? A farcebook petition ? Death threats [ to little children as well as refs ] ? Your like the scarecrow from the wizard of OZ  playing with himself ,you know clutching at straws !

 A flash back, lol Was Mozart onto something with his soggy fields theory?

 No soggy fields in the NH, is it the result of global warming?

No it's a concept called September...October tends to be different. But ffs JW get your terms right Global Warming is so passe` now that warming has stalled....it's Climate Change.

Ok, in October their will be soggy fields, lol But be careful because it will result in more seagulls. and we all know:

Seagulls hinder bok training

Provided by 3ku1

The coward Ceradunce recovered this threat from 2013 and raised a question afresh.  So let me give a fresh answer:-
Looking at what Meyer brought the Springbok team to - that dreadful no 6 ranking in world rugby - anybody can beat the Springboks.

  

 Clueless then no wiser now 

 I just read where the Boks were blaming sea-gull sh!t for their loss against the Japanese .Holy snapping sea-gull butts Batman say it isnt so !Gee wonder where that ars.hole bokillogic went to ? Maybe he got washed away with all the other turds like on that training pitch .

It's seagulls now is it? Well I guess they ran out of crow due to extra consumption

Bit o birdsh!t on the head means some good luck's coming your way (belief within certain cultures) .

 Blobbok over here it has to be while your going to church on sunday ,I suppose you could use it as an excuse to go home and have a leisurely clean-up while missing services and watching footy !J-Dub thats a bit harsh ,true though still a bit hurty !

Wardad, yes I was a little harsh but all in good fun. By the way, where is that wee chap Beeno? He must be devising his latest "theory"

Ward and JW, at least Beans didn't blame the ref. There is hope yet!!! 

Beeno has been a consistent supporter of the Boks & he did man up on the loss to Japan so credit where credit is due. One has to excuse the lunacy... I guess

 Nah, its got so bad even Beano's run out of excuses .

 Blobbok its the end of the world as we know it to stea l a line from REMs song ,it is surreal as a neutral that the Victorious Japanese [ or V-Jays for short]  beat the number 2 side in world rugby .Have no idea what thats done to beandips head but it may well have been crushed under atmospheric pressure once he emptied it of excuses .Like a tin can with all the air pumped out .

 Beeno's world is turned on its head

Well at least he hasn't pulled his hair out yet.

 Bwahahahahaha ! Beanhead is a family sorta guy is he not ? I actually feel a wee bit sorry for him .Shows how bad things have got !

Actually there was a clear case of obstruction in the second last Japanese  try....Coenie was prevented from making a tackle by the dummy runner. It seems churlish to bring it up, nevertheless it's true.  

mozart
 
Status: Hall Of Fame 
Posts: 13390RE: Could the Abs defeat the Boks on soft, neutral fields
September 22, 2015, 14:10:35

Actually there was a clear case of obstruction in the second last Japanese  try....Coenie was prevented from making a tackle by the dummy runner. It seems churlish to bring it up, nevertheless it's true. 

I pointed this out at the time it happened to my mates
It was clear and blatant obstruction
Not that it matters now