FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Crusaders crush Cheetahs; NZ Herald; By Gregor Paul

Crusaders crush Cheetahs; NZ Herald; By Gregor Paul

Started by Just_win15 REPLIES346 VIEWS· 21 Mar 2015, 12:10
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
21 Mar 2015, 12:10
#1
21 Mar 2015, 12:10#1

Crusaders 57
Cheetahs 14

A Cheetahs implosion or a Crusaders miracle - it doesn't matter.

All that does is that midway through the second half tonight, the Crusaders came alive and sounded a warning that they have got enough rugby in them to beat whoever gets in their way.

They had been puttling along until Willie le Roux's yellow card eight minutes after half time. And then, boom, they ignited. Helped no end by the Cheetahs' wild thinking and play, the Crusaders were able to score three tries in six minutes.

It was scarcely believable. It all came together for the home side - the passing, running lines, decision-making, support play - they were all perfect and the Cheetahs had no idea what hit them.

The initial damage was caused by the Crusaders' scrum, which has become a lethal weapon. It destroyed the Lions last week and was just as destructive tonight, albeit with a bit of help from a referee who didn't appear to know what was he doing.

For the first 50 minutes, though, it had become slightly worrying that a scrum was all the Crusaders had. It was the only area they were dominant, the only means they had to apply genuine pressure and indeed score points.

In fact, it was the only way they kept themselves in the game as they were static and clumsy with ball in hand. As soon as they moved away from their happy place, their game structures broke down.

The handling was again loose. Not as wild and erratic as it was against the Lions, but still frustratingly inaccurate when it had to be anything but.

Rugby at this level is about converting half-chances. It's about stringing together pass after pass that is on the mark and allows defences to be stretched to the point where they break.

The Crusaders, again, didn't do enough to break the Cheetahs in the first 50 minutes. They did enough to trouble the Cheetahs - enough to buckle and bend them a bit - but not enough to break them.

They looked like they were being hindered by an element of anxiety, a touch of over-eagerness to make things work and force the pace of the game.

They took risks they didn't need to, threw passes that were never on and lacked the discipline at times to hold their depth or simply go to ground with possession.

But all the time that scrum was sapping the Cheetahs, killing their belief and inflicting them with fatigue. And once Le Roux was in the bin for a high shot on Nemani Nadolo, it all clicked for the Crusaders.

Their attack game flowed. The passing was crisp. The running was direct and powerful and they looked like a different team.

In the thick of it was Dan Carter. One daft chip-kick direct into touch was not enough to change the opinion that he's getting there. The tentative stuff has all gone. He was direct and decisive and his confidence is clearly returning.

He's slowly remembering that he can play this game and that, if he backs his instincts and trusts himself to survive the contact, he's got plenty left to offer.

His tries, where he snatched a loose ball and took off both times, will have been a sweet moment. They were hardly a highlight of his illustrious career but they may prove significant in persuading him definitively that he's turned the corner.

It certainly helped persuade the Crusaders that they have turned the corner. It has taken them a while, but they are finally playing the type of rugby that will keep them in the hunt.

Crusaders 57 (J. Taufua (2), Penalty, I. Dagg, D. Carter (2), N. Nadolo, D. Havili tries; D. Carter 7 cons, pens)
Cheetahs 14 (F. Venter, J. Sadie tries; J. Pietersen 2 cons)
HT: 10-14

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
21 Mar 2015, 12:13
#2
21 Mar 2015, 12:13#2
This article sums it up well. The Crusaders did finally find their stride and played very well. Some fantastic tries. But for the wee ref blaming crowd here is a quote to keep you happy:
"The initial damage was caused by the Crusaders' scrum, which has become a lethal weapon. It destroyed the Lions last week and was just as destructive tonight, albeit with a bit of help from a referee who didn't appear to know what was he doing."
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
21 Mar 2015, 12:14
#3
21 Mar 2015, 12:14#3
 What a load of Goebells like propaganda. The ref prevented a fair contest.Even the first crusties try wa s no try


JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
21 Mar 2015, 12:26
#4
21 Mar 2015, 12:26#4
Beeno: your usual comments include the stats & how the SA team won them so they should have won the game. Looking at the first half stats alone it was a route.
61% of the possession and 71% of the territory. The Cheetahs were only in the game because of break away tries that were against the run of play. In the second half it was a route.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
21 Mar 2015, 12:49
#5
21 Mar 2015, 12:49#5
 JW that is not the point. The Cheetahs deserved a fair deal buit didnt get it.Given the fact the Cheetahs wer doing pretty well as the crusties try was not a try this blodd bath is a reflection on the ref.The crusties could easily have got a card re the tackles in the air - the ref when warning the crusties mentioned 3. Then the first crusties try was not a try and then the scrums were a shambles. Truly how come both the Cheetahs and Lions who have both scrummed well suddenly cant scrum and suddenly the Crusties are world beaters. Its ludicrous.
Take all  this into account and its hugely significant. At half time the Cheetahs were in it but were blown out the game. You cant simply say now that the crusties would have won regardless.
Anyhow nothing new of course.  


WA
WardadPro6,663 posts
21 Mar 2015, 13:44
#6
21 Mar 2015, 13:44#6
 If the Saders had just squeaked it in the poor wee cheaters might have a leg to stand on [unlike their scrum] but it was an old fashioned ars.e kicking ,the kind NZ teams rarely if ever seem to suffer as they have too much pride to just throw in the towel .As for likening us to an evil nazi piece of filth thats what I expect from you beandik-dik ,none of our people formed a wee broderbund .And saying that sort of nonsense brings shame on the many from SA who fought the nazis ,like the Mighty Salor Malan .
SH
ShezzaPro2,471 posts
21 Mar 2015, 16:12
#7
21 Mar 2015, 16:12#7
 "cheaters" Where has this come from? 
Wouldn't take too much into this victory, Crusaders would have lost to a better team today, 1st half was atrocious and scored a lot of your tries while against 14 men.  
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
21 Mar 2015, 16:51
#8
21 Mar 2015, 16:51#8
 Best example Cloudy is when Sharks beat the crusties with 13 men. Ref got desparate but even he couldnt swing it the hapless crusties way. BwahahahhahahahahaWhen it backfires its even more embarrassing!
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
21 Mar 2015, 16:56
#9
21 Mar 2015, 16:56#9
 I appeal to all kbbs - if the cap fits wear it.Thanks
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
21 Mar 2015, 18:00
#10
21 Mar 2015, 18:00#10
Looks like the hat fits you better Beeno 

PE
poi-ePro1,044 posts
21 Mar 2015, 21:12
#11
21 Mar 2015, 21:12#11
 Calling Kiwis Nazi's, celebrating when the Christchurch earthquake struck, the type of posts that get Beeno banned and crying his eyes out on Keo.  The difference between the two sides...skill level, Kiwi teams operate on a skill level so much higher than their Book counterparts... Go back 10 years you'll find the same model of rugby played by SA teams, big forwards moderately skilled backs who like to kick a lot....sorry but you just don't have the cattle.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
21 Mar 2015, 21:17
#12
21 Mar 2015, 21:17#12
 Lieing pooooie I never called nz Nazis - they certainly are not - more like delusional.
I said on kamp ss that I hoped the wee abs would be quacking in their boots next time they pla yed the Boks absolutely nothing wrong with that.
No more lies please poooooie.Thanks
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
21 Mar 2015, 21:19
#13
21 Mar 2015, 21:19#13
 Pooooo ie hope you saw the sharks beating the chiefs with one less man on the fi eld for most of the game?
Hhahahaahhahahahaha
PE
poi-ePro1,044 posts
21 Mar 2015, 21:21
#14
21 Mar 2015, 21:21#14
 Yeah right after the Christchurch earthquake, which saw you drop your nuts after you were rightly banned and slink around the internet begging to be let back on Kamp SS...pretty shameful really.  
PE
poi-ePro1,044 posts
21 Mar 2015, 21:23
#15
21 Mar 2015, 21:23#15
 Yep I saw it, full credit to the Sharks, weather was a big leveller but the Sharks defence and poor Chiefs handling saw them get home, but if that's SA's big hope for the title, well it's gonna be another lean year...remind me when SA last won a Super Rugby title again.
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
21 Mar 2015, 21:27
#16
21 Mar 2015, 21:27#16
 Beeno: the Mighty Chiefs & sharks game is on the other thread. This thread is about the Mighty Crusaders
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news