CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Nov 2014, 11:54#41
Zeromoron
Based on the performances of Matfield - there are about 6 locks better than him in SA - he is only in the team because of his pally-pally rleationship with Meyer. And his performances are deteriorating game after game. His claim to fame is his line out takes - but in the last two tests there were only 4 takes per game. In the meantime he moonlights in the backline and has become noted for weak tackles on poppsong players and for sabotaging backline moves - like happened twice on Saturday. He brings no grunt to the forward pack and is pushed out and aside with ease and his ball carries in traffic routinely result in no gain in territory and in possession losses or penalties
That is the case in respect of Slapgat Matfield. Anybody is better and that includes Du Toit, De Jager, Willemse, Du Plessis and at least four other locks.
Have pity on doffies please - idiots have to eb treated with compassion.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Nov 2014, 15:16#43
Zeromoron
This seems to be clear - the one player (De Jager) was supposed to cover the blindside of the maul - the other (Bismarck) the open side. The scrummie went throught the open side and De Jager has to turn back to help with defense on that side - which at that stage was basically Bismarck's responsibility.
As per normal - Mozart and you blame only De Jager for the problem and not a word about the role of Bismarck. Absolute BS once again from the two supremos in moronship on this site.
Zeromoron - how can you be so stupid to publish those photo's? mozart will flip alid because you ahve clearly exposed his interpretatio of what happened - not he will have to invent another lie to cover that incident.
26 Nov 2014, 16:07#45
And the two buddies start harping on in defence of ou Loodvoet. Bismarck was drawing Lood's attention that the slapgat was leaving a gapping hole in the defence and then tried to cover up the slapgat's balls-up while also keeping an eye on the man he was busy covering when he spotted Lood's balls-up.
Look at the second picture again and read this carefully:
Clearly, du Plessis has called de Jager across but must turn his hips in as Cubelli embarks on his rapid outside arc. Paused here, we see how dangerous the situation has become. de Jager is struggling to recover, du Plessis’s weight is on his heels and Cubelli has a decent-sized gap to aim for.
Case closed. This was argued twice already and I am not going to argue it for a third time.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Nov 2014, 16:24#46
Zeromoron
Hell dimwit- what a bloody idiot you are. Foeitog - it must be hard.
There is no indication on the phttot or anything else about Du Plessi calling De Jager over to the side of the maul where he is defending - or supposed to defend. The fact that De Jager sw what was happening and moved towrds Du Plessis came too late to cover the whole in defense that was in the first instance Bismarck's responsibility. He was on the openside of the maul - De Jager on the blindside. Only a supreme idiot would now discover Bismarck calling De Jager to cover that whole in de efense created by himself.
Hell - but your deduction is absolute BS and based on nothing at all.
The Slapgat in the Bok squad it is only one player that meirits that designation and that is Victor Matfield.
Happy moron's day to you.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
26 Nov 2014, 20:05#48
The howling of the jackals.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Nov 2014, 20:19#49
And the howling of the Morons - with Moron Mozart and Zeromoron in the le ad.
27 Nov 2014, 14:50#52
Nope. Photo one was the one that started the rot, idiot.
BIbiltongbek
Club Pro749 posts
BIbiltongbekClub Pro749 posts
27 Nov 2014, 16:09#54
Does anyone believe Matfield would have been called out of retirement if someone else was Bok coach?
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
27 Nov 2014, 16:19#55
Yes he was superb for the Bools and turned around their season.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
27 Nov 2014, 16:34#56
Oops - back to the BS spreading by Mozart - Matfield was not superb for the Bulls and turned their season around - it was the change at flyhalf that did it.
Biltongbek - the answer to your question is - no other coach would have called Matfield out of retirement - bearing in mind his circusmatnces. Every other coach would have seen what he actually produced in the tests since June and would have said - it is an exercise in futility in any event.
