De Kock still a bumbler

We saw some brilliant keeping from De Kock today. Looks like the best wicket keeping batsman in the world today.

@Beeno...

Jonny Bairstow says Hi

Mozart

Your  pet hate showing through again.   Are you serious in your BS again?

Mozart

Your  pet hate showing through again.   Are you serious in your BS again?

I was watching the famous 438 ODI repeat and Boucher made exactly the same mistake in that game -  yet there was not a  word from you about it.

You are never \factual - always prejudiced.  

What a farce - I wrote down indisputable facts about what the Steyns buggered up and you take it personally.   

What a joke!!!!!!!!!!!! .   

Mozart

By the way your attack on De Kock is standard - but the silence on the batting flops of Amla and Elgar is deafening.   Do you now re3alize that this type of approach is just not only questionable - but dishonest and prejudiced.    Get a life.

Xavi, Jonny Bairtow is not remotely in the glass of De Kock.  Look at the amazing agility of De Kock. 

Dr Mozzzzz majoring on isol ated incidents. All keepers make mistakes.

Because he missed one catch in how many tests he struggle in catch spinning balls.

What a load of standard garbage one should ignore;   He made lots  of  runs against all attacks he faced this far.   Fact is he scored  more ODI centuries against all comers than Smith scored throughout his career - but that does not count according to our prejudiced BSter,

It is this type of junk thinking  that cost us Dawid Malan who is now a top runscorer for England,    

Lets start with the WC squad.   Kirchner, Morne Steyn, Paige, Pienaar. De Villiers, Alberts, Matfield and  Brits to name a few.

All of them was not test standard anymore and De Villiers was poor after his injury,    Matfoeld was a joke in bad taste and  most of them could not make the starting line-up ever,

The above was all BS selections - whether you like it or not,    

Posted under the wrong heading,   However, my latest comment on the cricket issue is being ignored by Mozart so one must accept he cannot counter real cricket arguments,  

Mozart

Another Amla failure - any comments?    He is now with the same stunt Graeme Smith tried for years - 7 poor innings and when the public start to grumble he gets a 50 plus score.   Not good enough.  

Hell you are totally deluded,   De Kock scored more runs in the second innings than Amla scored in both innings,   

Most batsman  failed on a very difficult pitch because it was covered yesterday,   So in your book the only failure was De Kock.   You do not mind to be prejudiced and AL WAYS wrong - hey?    

I did not agitate to drop Amla ever and never delighted in Amla's failed test as alleged by you,   I mentioned Amla when you make your standard BS on De Kock which started when he replaced Graeme Smith in the ODI team in 2013.

That story has been ongoing ever since on your part despite De Kock already after 4 years has a better average record than Smith ever had.    You refuse to look at batting averages amd actual performance.    The example is also as per above.   Du Plessis made 62 runs in the latest test against  India - De Kock made 53 - so he is under attack by you as per normal.    

To come back to Amla -- his batting average is dropping faster and faster - it went down by 4 points in the last two years from 53 to 49,   For that to happen in a long career shows that he failed constantly in tests - a danger sign if ever there was one.    

Your age ma nia is coming through again and is a constant = sportsmen are assessed not in performance - but age and reputation - so what else is new? 

Thanks for typo correction - but no comment on facts as stated,    Tests are won by performance not age or reputation,

Koosk

Mozart hates all members with an opposing view to his,   He is prejudiced and when it comes to sport always go mad when his ideas about reputation selections are opposed,   His norm for selection is reputation only - performance counts for nothing.

He hates all players who replaced his favourites and is constant in attacking them,

Remember how he went for your user name initially - that is typical when he thinks you could turn out to be a possible opponent to his  sh!t ideas.    

Mozart

I saw the incident you wrote about on replay again nd I sometimes wonder whether you are not ashamed of yourself in starting a thread and misleading members about that incident.    There is not a wicketkeeper om the world and never was who would have made that catch.

Balls BSter/    You tried to mislead all the members by starting this thread and now suddenly try to be even more devious than you norma lly are.    FACT.   

Mozart

I am not going to lower myself to your level again and break my New Years resolution not to make personal attacks on members = sop have your fun.

Best advice  to you - keep to the factual situation and do not try to deceive the members by prejudicial attacks on sportsmen,  I will always expose that on site  and like happened in this case it will only disgrace you further.  

"Mozart

I am not going to lower myself to your level again and break my New Years resolution not to make personal attacks on members = sop have your fun."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Year%27s_resolution

"A New Year's resolution is a tradition, most common in the Western Hemisphere but also found in the Eastern Hemisphere, in which a person resolves to change an undesired trait or behavior, to accomplish a personal goal or otherwise improve their life."

You do realise that by declaring that particular new year resolution, that you have admitted to having a habit of making personal attacks on people, don't you?

Ceradunce

Who started the latest antics - your hero Mozart did it.   He is a freak - but not as bad as you are.   Incidentally you were expressly left out of that resolution you refer to as clearly stated on site.