I don't think de Allende is the world's best centre by any stretch but I also don't think he's useless and in the absence of any credible alternatives other than maybe Andre Esterhuizen and possibly Rohan Janse van Rensburg, he's the best we've got so he's a worthy Springbok and has been for most of his test career.
What does amaze me is that one of his fiercest critics on this forum is a complete and utter rugby noob who - as you can see on this (now heavily edited) thread - had never heard of Robbie Henshaw until the Lions tour last year.
Robbie Henshaw had over 50 test caps up to that point so to hear some puffed up and opiniated fool calling him Henderson and then mistaking him for Gavin Henson is a bit like someone saying "I'm something of a boxing afficionado and I think Mike Truman is the greatest heavyweight of all time" or "I'm an athletics expert and a huge fan of Usain Bale".
I'm quite sure this won't end the De Allende debate but hopefully readers will take some of the comments from whence they come.