Dylan Hartley eleven week ban for referee abuse

 http://www.theroar.com.au/2011/10/11/lawrence-blunders-his-way-out-of-a-rwc-semi-final/

There was another that I can find from a well known Aussie journalist who mentioned that he is the Wallabies biggest fan and he wants nothing but a win for them but not like that and it was clear to see that SA were the better team. He called it a hollow victory for the Wallabies and their supporters.

You need any more proof wanker?

p.s..Whats your infatuation with "small cocks or little cocks?" Something you need to tell us?

Another thing tosser, of course there will be no links referencing him being fired for cheating. Hell, they just let him fade away quickly and quietly. Losing his job is the least of his worries if he was found to have cheated. That would be a criminal offence and could mean a lot more serious trouble.

There is also a post on there about kiwi's being "embarrassed" and "ashamed" by Bryce Lawrence and the attention he brought on after that performance.

http://truebluenz.com/2011/10/08/bryce-lawrence-worst-referee-in-the-rwc/

http://www.therugbysite.com/blog_posts/198-it-is-time-to-blow-the-whistle-on-bryce-by-mark-reason

Just search his name. Trust me, you will find nothing positive!! Anymore proof fuckwit??

 http://www.theroar.com.au/2011/10/11/lawrence-blunders-his-way-out-of-a-rwc-semi-final/

There was another that I can find from a well known Aussie journalist who mentioned that he is the Wallabies biggest fan and he wants nothing but a win for them but not like that and it was clear to see that SA were the better team. He called it a hollow victory for the Wallabies and their supporters.

You need any more proof wanker?

p.s..Whats your infatuation with "small cocks or little cocks?" Something you need to tell us?

Another thing tosser, of course there will be no links referencing him being fired for cheating. Hell, they just let him fade away quickly and quietly. Losing his job is the least of his worries if he was found to have cheated. That would be a criminal offence and could mean a lot more serious trouble.

There is also a post on there about kiwi's being "embarrassed" and "ashamed" by Bryce Lawrence and the attention he brought on after that performance.

http://truebluenz.com/2011/10/08/bryce-lawrence-worst-referee-in-the-rwc/

http://www.therugbysite.com/blog_posts/198-it-is-time-to-blow-the-whistle-on-bryce-by-mark-reason

Just search his name. Trust me, you will find nothing positive!! Anymore proof fuckwit??

Goodness but you are sounding very angry indeed, Twatlogic.

You're double posting, repeating yourself, hallucinating and you're using a lot of very naughty words that I hope your Mummy didn't teach you!

Take some deep breaths, calm down and get someone to wipe your nose for you . . . there's a good little chap. Feeling better yet?

AAS you are confusing being angry and being right. Logic has just proved that the condemnation of Lawrence was widespread....and your defence of him just a convenient bit of posing.

Pffffft, you have to laugh at small cock and his pathetic attempts to supply reliable evidence to support his equally pathetic agenda.  Of his 3 " references" ( I use the word loosely here because references they are not) , one is written by an anonymous blogger using a pseudonym, the other is only a year old ( he must of missed the bit where I said "in the WEEK following the Wannabe" win over the PrickCocks( before Aussie opinion was swayed by their dismay at being humiliatingly manraped by the ABs at Eden Park ......again), and the last one is a lonely piece of hackneyed drivel written by some hard boiled loser with a serious hard on for NZ (much like yourself huh smallcock?

 http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/rugby-world-cup/breakdown-in-credibility-20111014-1lpjd.html

Here, let me help you. Here is a genuine contemporary article written by a genuine sports writer (one who actually gets paid) in a genuine periodical,  slamming Watson as a shameful disgrace for his criticism of Bryce. He also defends Brycies refereeing decisions.   This is what a credible reference looks like dumbass.

Still nothing about Brycie getting sacked as a direct result of his "cheating" in the 2011 quarter finals aye smallcock? Please don't waste my time by referencing bitter Saffa fanboy bloggers as though this were incontrovertible proof of your disturbing agenda..

Oh I get it, it never happened. Funny then that Lawrence said this about his performance:

""To then get to my biggest game and not referee anywhere near as well, I let myself down and I also let the team down. We were trying to pride ourselves on consistent performances so I felt I'd let them down."

Game, set and match.

He got no excuse. Could not have said it to a player because Richie McCaw wasn't playing in this game.  

Not they way the Saffa fanboys imagine it happened moz, no.

Only an idiot would claim that Brycie pithy apology is proof of cheating and a conspiracy against SA.  Fok you okes are too thick to reason with if this is the threshold of proof and evidence.

@Nukefreekiwi

Anyone who watches Rugby and listen to Aussie commentators on tv knows if you want to discuss something about Australia a Aussie site is the last place to go cause they are more bias than Keith Lawrence's son pretending to be a referee 

 I agree spooner.Aussies are terribly bias but it was illogical smallcock who originally said that " Bryce Lawrence was condemned by many rugby analysts the world over and even the Aussies knew it was a hollow victory".  I just wanted to show smallcock that the Aussie mainstream scribes were more than comfortable with Brycies refereeing in the quarter finals. They only jumped on the conspiracy bandwagon after the ABs man raped them at Eden Park.  

 The confession doesn't prove he cheated. Only Bryce knows if getting virtually every wrong call to favour the Aussies was cheating. It's immaterial though, he swung the result of the match.

I don't condone the death threats. That should never be a part of the game. But him not reffing another Bok contest is the right  result. How could he? The honourable thing would have been for him to have taken himself out of the running immediately. There are some mistakes that end your career. Blowing  a RWC QF is one of them.

nukefreekiwi, I just thought I'd commend you for coming up with "Small Cock"  as an alternative name for Twatlogic (aka Boklogic). It's a very appropriate name for him for two reasons . . .

Firstly, it's obvious from his behaviour on here that the little chap has a very small cock and . . .

Secondly, moffie (aka mozart) clearly likes Small Cock a lot and - if you'd read some of moffie's rather disturbing anecdotes about his days as a scoutmaster - you'd know that moffie likes . . . ummmmmm . . . small cock!

Well I guess you have lost the debate again RooiAAS....you are back to your 7 year old insults, you ancient lush.

Lawrence did not cheat. He is just a crap referee who got given a game way out of his league cause his dad is sitting high up the order in the referee world. Then add the Aussies phoning him moaning about the way he officiated the Ireland game and was told to change his interpertation. So he did only problem was he decided not to apply any.

But we did not lose the game because of Lawrence. We lost because we did not play to what we have and tried to take Australia on at their own game.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VpcBShKaVs

Look at that.  Simple way to win a game even with Stevie Wonder controlling the breakdowns

Well, firstly rooiprick, when I said without being silly and stupid comments, you chose to start the answer with twatlogic. Is that not being silly. Can I address your mother as a hillbilly hick who raised a bufoon and expect her to engage in normal banter with me?

I wont ignore you when you need all the guidance you can get. You are not right in your head my man. I find it impossible that a man of your age can debate like you do. You continuously bash Mozart but he knocks you back everytime and then you result to acting like a a kid because you haven't half the wit or brain power of Moz. I worry about you Rooinek and wont be surprised to see you on the news one day pulling an Arial Castro stunt. You already strike me as a man in a dark room, no friends with mom serving you your meals whilst you play dungeons and dragons waiting for us all to post online. 50+ years old..ha ha Rooinek the only twat my friend is you.

Your take on Bryce Lawrence debacle is laughable too. Nuke, nevermind the week after the game, immediately after the game there were comments flying around. A well known Aussie writer wrote a great post the day after and I just cant find it. You try find it. Must be there somewhere. Bryce himself admitted he was a prick. It really doesn't matter..With Honiss, Lawrence, Walsh and Jackson all running on kiwi blood, its expected! We dont need write ups to expose them. This has been done many times before. How come its always the kiwi refs having to admit post game, "I may have missed a few calls!" Its a fucken trend amongst those cheating cnuts!

50 year old man talking about cocks..Ones that he has never seen. Let me ask you something Rooinek, I am a 26 year old man that probably towers over you at 194cm (I have posted a pic before to back that up) but does it make you feel "horny" to picture me as a pimply face kid with a small cock?? You have issues Rooipoes! Maybe kids and cocks is a generation pass down in your family but it must end with you!

Nuke, dont bother posting drivel about "pro Lawrence" campaigners that wanted to see SA out of the world cup. Of course, with so many people in this world, we will have a divide between those that know he cheated and those that think he didnt. I can guarantee you that any "rugby" follower with any brains will be on the "Larence is a filthy cheat" side. The man himself admitted he was a prick, he was quickly demoted and hidden away and not much else looked into because had he remained in the spotlight, the man may have been exposed and faced a court of law.

Mehrtens, an AB great (only coz he was a Durban boy) thinks Lawrence is a cake and should never got higher than 2nd div rugby!

F##k me, Illogical Small Dick, I'm not sure if you're trolling or if these are the ramblings of an insane mind, mind you, I'd be angry too if I played for East Coast Gays.

Spooony's got it dead right. Bryce didn't cost the Boks the QF, they did it to themselves with poor tactics and clueless direction. I've watched several replays of that match and as a neutral, there were multiple contentious decisions where both the Boks and OZ were blatantly either off-side or had their hands all over the ball in rucks. How about you Saffas look at your own team for a change instead of just what Oz were doing?

The Boks were never going to win the 2011 WC and to suggest Bryce cheated is plainly ridiculous! Hell, we would rather have played the Boks in the semi as we knew we had the "wood" on them.

Cue Logic to now come in with something off You Tube which he probably invented himself! Please refrain from using 4 letter swear words in your reply Logic, you big 194cm brute of a man who earns 100k plus!

Spoony has nailed it. B. Lawrence made some bad calls that game against the Boks. But the Aussies getting in his ear before, and during the game had gotten to him. That is obviously not professional of Bryce Lawrence, and he definitely screwed it up, but he did not "cheat" the Boks out of a win. Yes, the calls against them hurt, but the amazing thing is, is if the Boks actually played well they could have still won it with all the bad calls against them.

Also, Bok Captains have got to "capture" the ear of the ref during games much better. They need to get that gamesmanship into their game. Some may call it whining, or cheating, but McCaw, and Pocock are great at this, and no matter what anyone says it influences the ref to a degree.

 The wood on us at RWCs? Hmmmm....seems to me it's 2 to 1 in the Boks favour. I very much doubt Henry would have preferred  playing the Boks....against Oz the ABs have an exploitable forward edge. Against the Boks in the RWC, the Boks pack is a hard nut to crack.

But back to Lawrence and the Oz win. Sure the Boks could have won in spite of the ref....but they didn't and the ref was quite possibly the difference. No need to over elaborate....it should be a level playing field.

Canrugby, Im sure John Smit knew how to "capture" the refs ear. I mean, he is one of the worlds best captains along with McCaw. Pocock is not in their level. As John Smit said, Bryce is easy to communicate with, he just doesn't listen. He had his ear but it was going out the other.

Moolaa, all I can say is I guess we will never know hey. I can tell you one thing though, all that possession we had against Australia that was blown up just before we could score would have made for an easy QF had it been a competent ref. NZL also did the semi pretty comfortably with a fair ref so it would have been two powerhouses clashing. WC's are different. Pressure is different. Mistakes tend to be a lot more crucial. As Graham Henry said in his interview, "The game he enjoys winning the most is against the Boks as they are NZL's most respected opponent!" I guess we will never know what would have happened. ps. How can the Boks look at what to change. Everytime we built up a sustained attack, we got through multiple phases and got close, we were penalised. Sometimes 1 or 2 phases to go until we would have been over. How can we build anything like that? I think the Boks performance that day was really good and enough to beat most teams with a fair ref. Boks had a game plan and it worked beautifully. No one scores tries all game off set play or phase 1 ball. Its periods of sustained attack or pressure that allows things to open up. Boks had all the ball, thats what we were doing and Bryce broke it down everytime until the Boks almost had to try score from set plays!

Poi-e, you right, you would be angry if you played for Bays because that would require getting off your lazy, dole hugging arse and applying yourself. Its easy for a mouse to act like a hero on here but have you ever played the game? Come take my position if its easy and the level of rugby is beneath you. Theres a challenge! Bro, I have nothing to lie to you about. Come down to the club and I will have a beer with you. Anytime. Then you can put to bed the 194cm claim. Im a friendly enough guy. I will buy mate!

 @ spooner.   Mate,  you are far too intelligent, rational and reasonable for the vast majority of SA's fanboy bloggers. I sincerely applaud you for your insight and courage especially when we consider that your conclusions regarding the RWC quarters (they are the conclusions of any sane and fair minded Bokke supporter) are tantamount to high treason,  punishable by a lifetime of internet stalking, death threats and repetitive trolling. Spooner, rooinek and a small clique of brave SA'n bloggers are the last custodians of the Republics collective rugby nous. Ka pai lads.  

@ rooinek. Cheers bro.  I also thought it was an apt handle for what's-his-face.  I believe your interpretation of the name "smallcock" and how it applied to specific forum members was a stroke of genius. Keep up the good fight. I know how hard it can be to reason with some of the forums most stubborn and rabidly bitter fanboys. It's a thankless endeavour but I admire your perseverance and commitment to the cause.

@boklogic,

"I can tell you one thing though, all that possession we had against Australia that was blown up just before we could score would have made for an easy QF had it been a competent ref."
so who was to blame for the Boks losing to the wallabies in durban earlier that year, when they had more ball, territory and also failed to score a try in a loss on home soil???
why is nothing mentioned about mornes two penalties he missed or lambies droppie, anyone of those could have won the Boks the game.
u saffa love to mention the dunedin test last year between the All Blacks where the Boks dominated and surprise surprise, they lost??? guess that was bryce lawernces fault too.

BTW u still havent given any info which clearly shows bryce was cheating, u have only porvided factoids.
i do think bryce was useless, but the Boks had bigger problems, like starting smit over bizzy, girly man brussow coming off injured and then morne and lmabie missing crucial goals,,,,sigh,,, each to their own though, being a saffa site i know we will be debating this for the next 4 years easy.

@mozter,
"I very much doubt Henry would have preferred  playing the Boks....against Oz the ABs have an exploitable forward edge. Against the Boks in the RWC, the Boks pack is a hard nut to crack."
All Blacks didnt seem to have too much problem cracking the Boks in the 2010 TriNats??? ur Boks couldnt even score a try against the B team we sent over to PE.
Boks are a tough nut, but for the last decade there have been 27 tests between the All Blacks and Boks and the Boks have won 8, giving them a winning percentage of 29.6%, making the All Blacks tough nut cracker experts, :oP

 Dude, I don't really care what size you claim to be, you don't have to meet you to know you act like a giant douche on this forum.