AUAugenöffner
Pro6,974 posts
AUAugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
23 May 2021, 15:05#13
It's as though you are from another planet Lügnerin, Rugby changed in the late 90s, quite dramatically. It was where South African rugby fell behind the rest of the world, and Australia were leading the way. As always, advancements came from rugby league, more specifically, John Muggleton. He was the first full time defence coach in rugby union; a masterstroke by Rod MacQueen. His advancements ramped up defence. Mortlock made his debut in 1997 against Argentina, but was a lethal weapon throughout the next decade. The ELVs from 2008 did regress the sport, and from the past decade defence stats have been declining markedly, and dropped off a cliff from 2015 onwards.
As per the Boks not adhering to the law changes until 2019? That is one of the most ignorant, immature and puerile comments I have seen from you. Nothing more than another Rassie hump-fest. Rassie stunted the Bok attack, which now ranks 15th in the world at best! We have tier two nations with far more sophisticated and better implemented attacking structures than us! Maybe the chicken run will worsen that. As per defence? The Bok defence is average. Territory mitigates the vulnerabilities that exist, weak points that existed under Coetzee. A difference in approach masks that weakness, but as we saw against New Zealand in the pool stage, only to a certain extent at the highest level. The Boks of Josè's reign were a clunky basher team with very slow developing attacking sequences that were far too deep, to heavily scripted and left our outside backs with little space and left our midfield very often swamped by defenders who caught us well behind the gainline. The pinnacle of the Bok attack post-Snor was under Meyer, with fast developing attacks with a more fluid, intuitive and proactive use of these modern attacking structures from rugby league. Rassie has some catching up to do.
Everything you stated is incorrect.