02 Mar 2015, 17:22#2
When you disregard the judgement of the ratings one week then support them the next it makes it rather off putting to debate with you.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
02 Mar 2015, 17:25#3
Actually I have no regard at all for the ratings, it's just another data point. I can't find one.....not one ....professional rugby commentator who thinks Steff outplayed Victor. Only posters on this site protecting their ingoing biases.
02 Mar 2015, 17:41#4
None of the people you've used as examples are truly experts, just journalists/fans that know no more/less than us.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Mar 2015, 17:41#5
That is the joke of the week.......what I want to know, is what exactly did Vic do in that game - serious question
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Mar 2015, 17:51#6
Mozart
I want to agree with Dave here - what exactly did Matfield do during that game?
I will make it easy for you and repeat his stats and that of Du Toit here and then you can tell me what Matfield did:-
Matfield0/100/4/76000110/01/110/0
PS du Toit0/000/2/828121015/46/010/0 Start with ball carries, line breaks, defenders beaten and continue with possession losses, tackles made, and line-out work. But most importantly - go and see what Matfield and Du Toit respectively produced in the Tighter phases of play. There is no way that Matfield came within 20% of what Du To it did in that game.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
02 Mar 2015, 18:12#8
So all the commentators were just journos hahaha keep digging. But it's nice you have found a little club that think a 90 per cent tackle ratio is a good as a 100 per cent ratio.That no try assist is as good as providing one try. That six rote lineouts taken at the back to avoid Victor, is as good as total lineout dominance up front.
Nothing is funnier than truth deniers.
