You do not believe facts and you are totally deluded about what you wrote,. You are totally deranged when you believe in what you wrote anyway. To come up with your statement is incredible.
Lets put it in simple language -
1 Erasmus was involved in extensive negotiations with SARU and the conditions he suggested was incorporated in the contract of employment that allows for -
* The appointment of Erasmus as Director of Rugby;
* That because of the short period of 15 months before the WC were too short for appointment of a Head Coach - he position vacated by Coetzee and as a temporary arrangement Erasmus would handle both jobs and a new Head Coach would be appointed.
2 That Erasmus will decide on the appointment of the supporting staff he would need. He picked the staff he wanted in accordance with the conditions of contract he entered into with SARU.
Fact is you wanted to shit yourself because Erasmus would take up the role of Director of Rugby full time and a Head Coach was to be appointed to work full time on the coaching and related issues. You accused Erasmus of doing what you claim is ordinary with him and abdicate responsibility because he cannot take pressure.
Now the fact is that the Head Coach organizationally falls under the Director of Rugby and in accordance with the negotiated agreement on employment Erasmus will identify which person he has selected as Head Coach and the appointment will be made accordingly.
In practice it is clear - Erasmus did not want anybody SARU appointed and he would have noit signed any agreement with them if he did not get the right top determine who would be the Head Coach.
Have you ever in your life heard about delegation of authority or is that totally absent from normal administrative management? However, in the situation you saw an opening to again get at Erasmus with BS comments.
Lastly this issue was repeatedly discussed in the media and even on this site about filling of the Head Coach job. After the Final in the WC especially you as per normal wrote tripe about the media influencing the game plan to be followed after a media storm about the game plan in the semi - total BS again - and you made a statement to the effect that Erasmus thrive on media hype - another BS story. He had to give interviews during the WC and on return to SA - but there was a media complaint that Erasmus do not give enough media interviews - why did that happen of he is what you claimed he is.
After it became totally clear that after the WC Erasmus move to his appointed post and the enxt step would be for appointment of the Head Coach. It was always clear that the Head Coach will be appointed - but Erasmus indicated that he would be closely involved in elements of the coaching anyway - even as Director of Rugby. It also was emphasized that the final decision as the who would be appointed as Head Coach will rest with Erasmus.
That is why I was surprised about you going on another BS approach on the issue. But then I expected it would happen anyway because you always tried to denigrate Erasmus in the past and from your recent posts it was clear you were just changing tactics slightly - but your anti Erasmus campaign on site is in fact going full steam ahead,
You are not as crude as AO - but nevertheless on the same path. You cannot take it that the new situation as the Springbok team has changed for the better and that the destruction by Meyer and Coetzee is being remedied.
If there is a Shifty Schiff on site it is you and you can add Strzok to that description as well, What we believe in is fact - what you write on site is BS. But you have been at it for years.
So let look at Awards decided on by a panel of experts - top known ex-internationals. You take it onto yourself to identify your own candidates and then the BS start flowing in site. Do you know more about rugby than respected world rugby experts decide on a factual basis? I think not.