Erasmus's remarks on Scotland test

No - you do not give a shit about facts ever,   It is evident that the discussion includes  kicks at goal ahead of penalty  corner kicks,  which is where the usage of mauls is of vital importance.   

In all the above cases it happened twice and the reason was the Springboks needed a try to win and kicks at goal at that's tage would not have helped.   The buggered up the first ball when the throw went to Snyman and after the second throw went to Mostert - the maul went backwards and Mostert was lifted off the ground,   It was when Du Toit took over and he and Vermeulen caused the maul to start going forward, resulting in the try being scored.

Now stop whining and start thinking about a proper rugby discussion.

Doffies

I tried to be civil - but you are stretching my patience.   Dimness the argument was twofold -

*    the comments made by Erasmus about the problem of rolling mauls deficiency in the Springboks; and

*    the fact that the team kicked at goal and did not make corner kicks to be followed by the most important rolling mauls.

I gave the facts about the second issue and it did go straight over your head.   Why should I bother - you cannot understand anything.      

"I gave the facts about the second issue...."

For some reason you just do not understand that your opinion does necessarily constitute a fact.

Dimness - not opinion - but facts.,  Denying that normally the teams like the AB's will make penalty corner kicks especially earlier in the games.   

Aside from the AB's, against SA it was constantly done by England - France and Scotland.   Why that - while we did not do it - but for two penalties late in the French game - when a kick at goal would not have helped SA to win the game.

In all the other cases it never happened, why?   Because, what Erasmus said, it was unacceptable that SA driving mauls became ineffective and not used anymore. 

However, ignoring facts shows a degree of stupidity beyond belief.       

Ceradunce

Because you are utterly ignorant does not make for discussion and that is exactly why discussion with idiots is impossible. 

I gave a full explanation and it is not theory or opinion - but you were too stupid to realize what was discussed.    

I gave the reference to what Erasmus said in public.  I gave the issue as to penalty goal kicks and penalty corner kicks.   I gave the full reason why it happened twice in the French test.    The issue should have been understood by a grade 2 pupil - but not by you.   Why?       

What facts did you check - piss brain?   

Are you calling Cera a piss brain, or asking if he consulted piss brain for facts? 

He is slightly worse than you bird brain.

First of all AO checked it too and came up with 2 that were no rolling mauls at all.  He does not know what a  rolling maul is - do you?