FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Five lessons from Simon

Five lessons from Simon

Started by Mozart8 REPLIES172 VIEWS· 01 Mar 2015, 15:51
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
01 Mar 2015, 15:51
#1
01 Mar 2015, 15:51#1

Five lessons from the third round of Vodacom Super Rugby, according to SIMON BORCHARDT.

Victor Matfield can still make an impact at this level
The 37-year-old Bulls lock was heavily criticised after the Bulls' loss to the Hurricanes, with former Bok prop Ollie le Roux accusing him of 'playing like an old man’ and no longer able to influence proceedings at Super Rugby level. Matfield responded by winding back the clock for the match against the Sharks at Loftus on Saturday and producing one of his best performances since coming out of retirement. He disrupted the Sharks lineout, stealing one of their throws, but also made an impact in open play, with seven carries and 10 tackles. The challenge for him now is to do it on a consistent basis.

Some officials still can't spot a forward pass
The Sharks had every right to feel aggrieved following their 43-35 loss to the Bulls, as a number of refereeing decisions went against them. The worst call came in the 25th minute when the Bulls were leading 9-6. Jesse Kriel made a strong run, but his pass clearly went forward – from his hands and after it left his hands – to Francois Hougaard, who scored the try. After initially being told by one of his assistants to check with TMO Johan Greeff that Bjorn Basson hadn't put a foot in touch earlier in the move, referee Jaco van Heerden decided he had better check Kriel's pass too. Incredibly, Greeff said it was not obvious the ball had gone forward from the fullback's hands and the try stood, much to the disgust of Sharks CEO John Smit, who tweeted at the time: 'Oh my word, losing to a better team on the day I can handle but these decisions so far will ruin my mood drastically.'

Coenie Oosthuizen can hold his own at tighthead prop against a quality loosehead
Heyneke Meyer would have been a happy man after watching the Cheetahs' 25-24 win against the Blues on Friday night. The Bok coach has insisted Oosthuizen has what it takes to become a good Test tighthead, and he will be even more convinced after the 25-year-old's display at scrum time. While Oosthuizen didn't dominate All Blacks loosehead Tony Woodcock, he certainly held his own. The Free Stater also impressed in open play, making three ball-carries and 13 tackles, which deservedly earned him the Man of the Match award.

The Cheetahs can win without the ball
The match in Bloemfontein provided another example of the fact that it's often better not to have the ball in modern-day rugby. Based on the stats supplied by the Vodacom Rugby App, the Blues should have won comfortably. Metres run: Blues 508, Cheetahs 237. Clean breaks: Blues 11 Cheetahs 3. Defenders beaten: Blues 30 Cheetahs 8. Tackles made: Blues 29, Cheetahs 130. The Blues also had 70% possession and almost 80% territory. Ultimately, their poor finishing and lack of patience in the red zone let them down, while the Cheetahs defended well at times and were prepared to put boot to ball. The hosts kicked out of hand on 23 occasions (a high figure considering how little ball they had), with flyhalf Joe Pietersen doing so nine times and fullback Willie le Roux 11. It was a smart strategy that helped secure four valuable log points.

A draw's not good enough for the Lions
In an amazing period of play after the hooter at Ellis Park on Saturday night, the Lions took the ball through a combined 35 phases, during which they were awarded two kickable penalties that would have secured a 22-22 draw. But having lost their first two fixtures, captain Warren Whiteley decided to go for a match-winning try, and his side came agonisingly close when Howard Mnisi had the ball knocked out of his hands by Damien de Allende as he was diving over the line. Mnisi then knocked on again after the Lions had taken another penalty tap, and the Stormers escaped with the victory. Perhaps it would have been more sensible for the Lions to take a draw against a defensively strong team like the Stormers, and get some reward for their efforts on the night.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Mar 2015, 16:16
#2
01 Mar 2015, 16:16#2
 Mozart
A whole write-up about a player who is supposed to be the number 1 line out specialist taking one opposition ball and one other line out ball in the whole match.   His feeble tackles do not result in ball turnovers and he is a feeble tackler.   His contribution in Tight 5 play is negligible to the point of being non-existent.   And his seven ball carries produced an average meter gain of less than a meter. 
I cannot understand how you as a rugby lover cannot evaluate performances properly and have to hark back to players of a decade ago - without regard to their present performances.   
If Matfield is in the team - we will struggle badly to get through the Round Robin games of the WC and will never ever get past the quarter-finals stage.   He is bad news and that is a fact.      


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
01 Mar 2015, 17:17
#3
01 Mar 2015, 17:17#3

Well what does it say about your hero Stephanie that he was totally outplayed by  a player who is such 'bad news'. The worse you make Victor out to be.....the even worse is your hero. For one thing is for sure, Matfield won their battle hands down....according to every rugby expert I can find.

 

Suck on that you old coot.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
01 Mar 2015, 17:47
#4
01 Mar 2015, 17:47#4
 7 carries bwhaaahaaaaa...One line out take all game one line out conceded and one steal make. So that is a net gain on one line out take all game and this clown says he disrupted the Sharks line out - wow
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
01 Mar 2015, 17:48
#5
01 Mar 2015, 17:48#5
 7 carries bwhaaahaaaaa...One line out take all game one line out conceded and one steal make. So that is a net gain on one line out take all game and this clown says he disrupted the Sharks line out - wow
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
01 Mar 2015, 17:51
#6
01 Mar 2015, 17:51#6
Moz how on earth did Vic out play PSDT who was huge all game. Geez stop speaking crap man this is insulting. It was no contest PSDT was huge.
Hell he gained metres he beat defenders it chalk and cheese stuff what game were you watching
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Mar 2015, 19:29
#7
01 Mar 2015, 19:29#7
 Mozart is being absurd.  All logic indicates that compared to what Du Toit achieved during the game - Matfield was poor compared to Du Toit.   Problem is Matfield has become the poorest ball carrier in the team and his famed line-out prowess has dwindled to near to zero.   Because he started losing line outs on own throw - his mechanism now is to call line out throw-ins to go to other players.  
Matfield is physically way to weak for the modern game.   His weight is now given as 105 kgs - less than the weight of most loosies and the lack of physicality shows in all games he is involved in.   The players just pushed him aside as happened in maul situations.   He provides no defense against opposition mauls - as was clearly showed when the English scored one of their tries at Twickenham and Matfield was yellow-carded.   In two cases yesterday Matfield landed on his backside when he tried to enter mauls - just what happened in the first two line-outs in the game yesterday.  
I really am surprised that Mozart cannot see what is wrong with Matfield's performances.   Any person with a modicum of rugby knowledge would realize it immediately.   I think it may have something to do with his fixation with the age of players and his constant harking back to 2007.   For him since then time has stood still - so maybe we should just accept that wjhatever he writes must be taken for what it is - real outdated garbage.           
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
01 Mar 2015, 20:48
#8
01 Mar 2015, 20:48#8
Well that's where we differ, I am not at all surprised you can't see the contribution Matfield made. For you guys it's all kgs and age....and stats. But after the first two games Matfield was second  among our players in tackling. Of course written off as he was " weak" in the tackle.
Highly unlikely the Bools would have beaten the Sharks without Victor, and in your dishonest little hearts you know that.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
01 Mar 2015, 21:51
#9
01 Mar 2015, 21:51#9
That's all Matfield does, he effects powder puff low tackles which would make a centre proud. There is never a hard physical enforcing tackle made as he carries no physical punch these days.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news