Hey vlagshit talk us through Bismark not missing

Let me help, Lomp was the inside tackler,  Bismarck the outside. Vetsak you always ding the inside tackler....and the Bargie never ran into Bismarck, the way Barrett ran slap bang into JJ.JJ should have made the tackle....Bismarck could have made the tackle, but it was up to Lomppp.

 Let em explain - Mozart is going into examples 1 and 2 here of his normal misleading assessments and has the audacity or stupidity  to quote example 1.   He is a complete biased idiot here as per normal.
He did not notice that in the first pic of his soulmate and fellow moron - Bismarck was defending on the openside of the maul - and De Jager on the blindside.   The next move by the scrummie is to the openside into the hole defended by Bismarck and De Jager simultaenously moved towards Bismarck to assist in the defense - but effectively too late.   
Whose problem was it in the dirst instance?  Obviously that of Bismarck and not De Jager.   But then - De Jager is one of Mozart's moist hated players - so he must get the blame.
The inside and outside defender had nothing to do with the argument and Mozart use it as an argument  to cover the  BS  he always spread on this site.  
Happy moron's date - prejudiced idiot.     

 Nonsense. The fact that Lomp took a while to figure out he should be on the blind side only confirms how slowly he processes information. Where he came from is irrelevant. In the end,  to his credit he got there as the inside tackler.....but then sadly botched the tackle. 
But please continue to make my day by trying to defend this hopelessly overrated player.

Typical diversion tactics by the two clowns. Rather start a new thread, away from the one where the evidence of their hero' balls up is hosted.   

 Mozart
The only prejudiced fool are you.   The fact is that De Jager is an above average player - but you make  him out to be useless.   Why - because he represented a threat in selection of your two idols - Low Workrate Bakkies and Slapgat Victor.  Neither of those two should have been in the Springbok squad -  De Jager is of more use than the two together are in Tight 5 play.     
Your story changd according to the photos published by Zeromoron - what next is to be expected?   Hell - the joke gets more funny  by the second - the explanation more weird - and the ftwo morons  look more moronic as well.   
When will you ever publish a realistic assessment of anything happening on a rugby fiield - useless spreaders of BS is all that you can really do. 
     

This ou Lomp is not fit to tie Victor's boot laces....nor could he figure out how. 

 So is Victor's bootlaces as weak as Victor is physiclly ?  

 Brodie Retilluck the god of Tight Five says hello