Captain49,914 posts
22 Jan 2015, 22:31
#1
22 Jan 2015, 22:31#1
Mozart is going on about Reinach as if he is paid for the job. About half of his statement on Reinach is unadulterated BS - the remainder is just plain BS.
Hypocritical unprovoked Mike attacks....the string
Started by Mozart44 REPLIES1,091 VIEWS· 22 Jan 2015, 22:31
Coach57,555 posts
23 Jan 2015, 01:59
#2
23 Jan 2015, 01:59#2
Mozart
That is not a personal attack on you - it is strong criticism of what you come up with as to a member of this site in respect of a rugby player. Your constant attacks on players you do not like is always extreme and one incident in a game is built into a myriad of negative incidents.
If somebody counters that you throw a hissyfit, like happened in this case, .
That is not a personal attack on you - it is strong criticism of what you come up with as to a member of this site in respect of a rugby player. Your constant attacks on players you do not like is always extreme and one incident in a game is built into a myriad of negative incidents.
If somebody counters that you throw a hissyfit, like happened in this case, .
Captain49,914 posts
23 Jan 2015, 05:17
#3
23 Jan 2015, 05:17#3
Well here is another clear cut example. I make the suggestion we bring back Kallis just for the CWC, given we have a real problem with the fifth bowler. Here is your response Kettleblack
Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 14771RE: Bring back Jaque Kallis for the CWC
January 20, 2015, 04:32:12 The biggest load of balls written in ages. "Kallis is not who he was. But he can still bowl a line and choose the right ball. Coming in at seven I suspect he'd make a ton of runs.".
After a string of poor batting and a situation that he did not bowl at all in the last series he was involved in - and after his contract with Colcatta Night Riders was not renewed, but most importantly, after Kallis announced he is not competitive enough anymore - this moron suggests that Kallis be brought back in.
On what would that silliness be based? Reputation alone - since his performance ability is a goner? But then we are dealing here with the idiot who support Matfield's selection - so what else can be expected from him?
Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 14771RE: Bring back Jaque Kallis for the CWC
January 20, 2015, 04:32:12 The biggest load of balls written in ages. "Kallis is not who he was. But he can still bowl a line and choose the right ball. Coming in at seven I suspect he'd make a ton of runs.".
After a string of poor batting and a situation that he did not bowl at all in the last series he was involved in - and after his contract with Colcatta Night Riders was not renewed, but most importantly, after Kallis announced he is not competitive enough anymore - this moron suggests that Kallis be brought back in.
On what would that silliness be based? Reputation alone - since his performance ability is a goner? But then we are dealing here with the idiot who support Matfield's selection - so what else can be expected from him?
Captain49,914 posts
23 Jan 2015, 05:21
#4
23 Jan 2015, 05:21#4
So there you are, a nasty personal attack highlighted. Frankly who cares. I don't, you have been doing it for years. What's new is your pathetically hypocritical claim that other posters are guilty of driving away a few wimps, while you are pure as driven snow.
Practice what you preach hypocrite.
Practice what you preach hypocrite.
sharkbok
Captain23,286 posts
Captain23,286 posts
23 Jan 2015, 06:07
#5
23 Jan 2015, 06:07#5
Captain49,914 posts
23 Jan 2015, 06:14
#6
23 Jan 2015, 06:14#6
Oh look, it's the biblical scholar.
Coach57,555 posts
23 Jan 2015, 08:22
#7
23 Jan 2015, 08:22#7
Mozart
You claim a few cases where I went overboard and not the hundreds of cases where in some cases responses were made only after your nasty personal attacks. When people differ from your point of view and their differences are supported by factual information - you get vicious just about every time you make postings.
Lets look at your latest statement:-
"other posters are guilty of driving away a few wimps"
That embodies your attitude towards other members. Why call them WIMPS? They are human beings with feelings - who cannot be attacked constantly by you with your superiority complex coming to the fore continuously. I do not constantly belittle people - but mostly in your case reacts to nastiness. I do indicate when and why I differ from them and state my case - you just turn vicious. It would help a lot if you show more respect to posters and not belittle them constantly.
You claim a few cases where I went overboard and not the hundreds of cases where in some cases responses were made only after your nasty personal attacks. When people differ from your point of view and their differences are supported by factual information - you get vicious just about every time you make postings.
Lets look at your latest statement:-
"other posters are guilty of driving away a few wimps"
That embodies your attitude towards other members. Why call them WIMPS? They are human beings with feelings - who cannot be attacked constantly by you with your superiority complex coming to the fore continuously. I do not constantly belittle people - but mostly in your case reacts to nastiness. I do indicate when and why I differ from them and state my case - you just turn vicious. It would help a lot if you show more respect to posters and not belittle them constantly.
Captain18,117 posts
23 Jan 2015, 08:37
#8
23 Jan 2015, 08:37#8
Moffie was solely responsible for Arthur John leaving and he also played a major part in the departures of Biltongbek and Ole Cruz.
The irony is we lost a poster like Ole Cruz who is a current test player who gave us insights into one of the world's top-ranked test sides . . . but we retained a pompous, self-absorbed and deceitful old blowhard who doesn't even know what numbers the loosehead and tighthead props wear on their backs!
I wish we'd kept the excellent posters who've left because of Moffie's infantile behaviour and dumped him instead.
Now watch the childish and conceited old liar accuse me of trying to drive him away and call for the board to vote as to whether he stays or not . . . and watch his Servile Gimps rally to his defence!
Pffffffffffhahahaha! Actually I shouldn't laugh . . . it's happened before!
The irony is we lost a poster like Ole Cruz who is a current test player who gave us insights into one of the world's top-ranked test sides . . . but we retained a pompous, self-absorbed and deceitful old blowhard who doesn't even know what numbers the loosehead and tighthead props wear on their backs!
I wish we'd kept the excellent posters who've left because of Moffie's infantile behaviour and dumped him instead.
Now watch the childish and conceited old liar accuse me of trying to drive him away and call for the board to vote as to whether he stays or not . . . and watch his Servile Gimps rally to his defence!
Pffffffffffhahahaha! Actually I shouldn't laugh . . . it's happened before!
Pro3,977 posts
23 Jan 2015, 09:54
#9
23 Jan 2015, 09:54#9
This is so funny!! You are all guilty of attacking what the other says, it basically makes no difference weather a statement is true or not, valid or not. You all do exactly the same thing.
Just thought I'd point that out. Anyway, carry on!
Just thought I'd point that out. Anyway, carry on!
Captain18,117 posts
23 Jan 2015, 10:18
#10
23 Jan 2015, 10:18#10
Bluebok, I assume that when you say "you are all guilty of attacking what the the other says" that you are referring to the people who have contributed to this thread so far . . . ie, Moffie, ou Maaik, Sharkbok and myself (because if you were referring to just Moffie and ou Maaik you would have said "both" rather than "all").
If that is the case, do you have actual examples of ou Maaik and I attacking one another or ou Maaik attacking Sharkbok or Sharkbok and I attacking each other?
If you go back a long time you may well find some examples of Sharkbok and I crossing swords but that was back when he accused me of being Saffex's Gimp and he hasn't claimed that for a while so we seem to be getting on a bit better . . . but my point is, there is one of the 4 posters on this thread who is regularly clashing with the other three and those other three don't engage in personal attacks on one another. It's not the free-for-all that you are insinuating so if you want to get involved in these spats, do a bit of research or else choose your words a bit more carefully. Thanks.
If that is the case, do you have actual examples of ou Maaik and I attacking one another or ou Maaik attacking Sharkbok or Sharkbok and I attacking each other?
If you go back a long time you may well find some examples of Sharkbok and I crossing swords but that was back when he accused me of being Saffex's Gimp and he hasn't claimed that for a while so we seem to be getting on a bit better . . . but my point is, there is one of the 4 posters on this thread who is regularly clashing with the other three and those other three don't engage in personal attacks on one another. It's not the free-for-all that you are insinuating so if you want to get involved in these spats, do a bit of research or else choose your words a bit more carefully. Thanks.
Captain26,388 posts
23 Jan 2015, 11:45
#11
23 Jan 2015, 11:45#11
Come now Rooi, Moz wasn't responsible for Thomas's leaving and Arthur John was a bit childish to leave in a huff because of a few chirps, if that was his reason.
Pro3,977 posts
23 Jan 2015, 12:30
#12
23 Jan 2015, 12:30#12
Settle down Rooi! I probably was not clear in what I said, but let me put it like this. You and Moz obviously don't sit around the same table, so when he says something, you're basically guaranteed to have an argumentative response. Even if his post was not aimed at you. "All guilty of attacking..." maybe not the best wording, but we are pretty much all guilty of having a go at someone!
Captain12,893 posts
23 Jan 2015, 13:18
#13
23 Jan 2015, 13:18#13
It's funny you say Bluebok and you're not wrong. It wasn't so long ago when the biggest hypocrite on the board slagged off my late parents, he called them low life stock.
Rooinek the squeaky clean Huh!? .....yep, that's funny.
Captain49,914 posts
23 Jan 2015, 17:37
#14
23 Jan 2015, 17:37#14
Poor old RooiAAS, what a hypocrite. He has the temerity to accuse me of driving players off the site after his embarrassing failed attempt to get me to leave. What a twit.
For the record I have never asked anybody to leave the Board. Nor have I asked for any help from any Webbie. Nor have I appealed to the Board to gang up on a member like RooiAAS.
The departure of Fartur seems to have created this latest attack. Fartur and I have had many clashes and he has been scathing about my American persona. There was nothing abnormal in our latest spat, so if he left it was probably for other reasons, and it was just convenient to blame the innocuous interchange.
Frankly he is no loss.
For the record I have never asked anybody to leave the Board. Nor have I asked for any help from any Webbie. Nor have I appealed to the Board to gang up on a member like RooiAAS.
The departure of Fartur seems to have created this latest attack. Fartur and I have had many clashes and he has been scathing about my American persona. There was nothing abnormal in our latest spat, so if he left it was probably for other reasons, and it was just convenient to blame the innocuous interchange.
Frankly he is no loss.
Coach57,555 posts
24 Jan 2015, 04:48
#15
24 Jan 2015, 04:48#15
Mozart
Calling the member Fartur is a gross insult and totally uncalled for. Adding - "frankly he is no loss" - is another reason why you are uncouth and a real problem on this site. Some people take your rubbish as coming from a member who knows only how to be rude and uncouth - others knows what you re really like and ignore most of your BS.
"He has the temerity to accuse me of driving players off the site"
Read what this member says and judge for yourself. AJ is one member who gave up on membership of this site - how many more are there who cannot take your BS any longer? I can think of at least two more who lefdt this site because of you.
Calling the member Fartur is a gross insult and totally uncalled for. Adding - "frankly he is no loss" - is another reason why you are uncouth and a real problem on this site. Some people take your rubbish as coming from a member who knows only how to be rude and uncouth - others knows what you re really like and ignore most of your BS.
"He has the temerity to accuse me of driving players off the site"
Read what this member says and judge for yourself. AJ is one member who gave up on membership of this site - how many more are there who cannot take your BS any longer? I can think of at least two more who lefdt this site because of you.
Captain49,914 posts
24 Jan 2015, 07:47
#16
24 Jan 2015, 07:47#16
Fartur? Very hurtful? Well to me it seems pretty inocuous And surely Less nasty than Rooinek calling me Moffie, and after he has done it hundreds of times you never mentioned it once. Never once were you offended by that offensive slur.
So what do we have in your latest post.....why just another hypocritical attack. You can't stop yourself.
So what do we have in your latest post.....why just another hypocritical attack. You can't stop yourself.
Coach57,555 posts
24 Jan 2015, 08:33
#17
24 Jan 2015, 08:33#17
Mozart
I granted that moffie is a slur and have not commented on it since to my mind that kind of thing is unacceptable - whomsoever uses it. Rooinek is utterly wrong n using that slur and it is clear to me it is not deserved.
However, if Rooinek uses that term - and he is the only one on the site using it -it does not give you the right to be crude in your comments iro of other members. Ity is not a hypocritical comment I raised in my last post - it is factual and aim at making the site more acceptable and not to cause departure of members.
I know what to expect from you - and that includes your normal nastiness when people disagree with you - and ignore most of the rubbish you often enough comes up with - but others do not and leave the site because of your bullying attitude.The solution would be that you can use the nastiness against me and at least be civil to other posters. As it is - I can handle it and constantly make you look foolish when you make silly rugby comments.
I granted that moffie is a slur and have not commented on it since to my mind that kind of thing is unacceptable - whomsoever uses it. Rooinek is utterly wrong n using that slur and it is clear to me it is not deserved.
However, if Rooinek uses that term - and he is the only one on the site using it -it does not give you the right to be crude in your comments iro of other members. Ity is not a hypocritical comment I raised in my last post - it is factual and aim at making the site more acceptable and not to cause departure of members.
I know what to expect from you - and that includes your normal nastiness when people disagree with you - and ignore most of the rubbish you often enough comes up with - but others do not and leave the site because of your bullying attitude.The solution would be that you can use the nastiness against me and at least be civil to other posters. As it is - I can handle it and constantly make you look foolish when you make silly rugby comments.
Captain26,388 posts
24 Jan 2015, 09:18
#18
24 Jan 2015, 09:18#18
Mike, nothing like calling someone "dofdoos"?Look AJ is a nice enough bloke, but he had a chip on his shoulder when it came to Moz. He always initiated the insults and calling him Farter is mild IMO
Coach57,555 posts
24 Jan 2015, 09:35
#19
24 Jan 2015, 09:35#19
DbDraad
After my New Years resolutions I am not using that kind of term anymore. I used the term in the case of Ceradyne - because his only topic for discussion was to attack my postings - so I am just calling him Ceradyne - or Ceradunce when he really get me hopping.
I am trying to get some civility back on this site. With Mozart it is hopeless, he just cannot respond without getting insulting. Rooinek's and his animosity has been around for years and nobody ever would fix that one. I used to support Mozart in his arguments with Rooinek - but he has become so obnoxious over the past two years, I just do not interfere in their battles anymore.
After my New Years resolutions I am not using that kind of term anymore. I used the term in the case of Ceradyne - because his only topic for discussion was to attack my postings - so I am just calling him Ceradyne - or Ceradunce when he really get me hopping.
I am trying to get some civility back on this site. With Mozart it is hopeless, he just cannot respond without getting insulting. Rooinek's and his animosity has been around for years and nobody ever would fix that one. I used to support Mozart in his arguments with Rooinek - but he has become so obnoxious over the past two years, I just do not interfere in their battles anymore.
Captain49,914 posts
24 Jan 2015, 16:21
#20
24 Jan 2015, 16:21#20
So because you made some kind of new year's resolution not to use disgusting names like "dof doos" suddenly you become the Board Censor and find Fartur unacceptable? Odd that, it insults no population group, no gender, nobody's family or religion. You are completely silent on all those topics....but "Fartur", boy that puts the Western world at risk.
Mike you are a liar, a coward who slinks off rather than admitting your many mistakes and the day you better me in an argument the moon will be made of green cheese.
You are in fact a joke, only you haven't grasped that yet.
Coach57,555 posts
24 Jan 2015, 19:52
#21
24 Jan 2015, 19:52#21
Mozart
I have beaten you so many times in arguments - I almost feel sorry for you. The only way you respond when beaten is through personal attacks - so you have a clear idea about those as well.
Unfortunately you have a serious superiority complex problem - so you cannot grasp when in fact you have been beaten. The joke is always to read your postings and how you go ballistic when people don't agree with you.
For me you are serious entertainment and every time I see a silly comment about you writing about aging and in most cases non-performing players, I really enjoyed the mirth - so who is the joke in this case?
I have beaten you so many times in arguments - I almost feel sorry for you. The only way you respond when beaten is through personal attacks - so you have a clear idea about those as well.
Unfortunately you have a serious superiority complex problem - so you cannot grasp when in fact you have been beaten. The joke is always to read your postings and how you go ballistic when people don't agree with you.
For me you are serious entertainment and every time I see a silly comment about you writing about aging and in most cases non-performing players, I really enjoyed the mirth - so who is the joke in this case?
Captain40,032 posts
24 Jan 2015, 21:56
#22
24 Jan 2015, 21:56#22
Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn.Anybody like to tell me how the universe created itself from nothing. Now THAT is always hugely entertaining. Unfortunately nobody could apart from an eternal first cause.Pots should not call kettles black oaks. I am mortified come to think of it that nobody has roasted that uncouth cretin roooitwit for calling me "baboon ou" which has led to me spending R1000s at the shrink to staighten out my self image!!!!!
Bwahahahahahahahaha please grow up oaks and lets not point fingers and get all hyper sensitive. Try and conduct yourselves in a manner worthy of any self respecting rugby man. All others should leave and join the girl guides under 13!!Pity Arthur left but he has a glass jaw. Hopefully he will toughen up and return.
Bwahahahahahahahaha please grow up oaks and lets not point fingers and get all hyper sensitive. Try and conduct yourselves in a manner worthy of any self respecting rugby man. All others should leave and join the girl guides under 13!!Pity Arthur left but he has a glass jaw. Hopefully he will toughen up and return.
Captain49,914 posts
24 Jan 2015, 22:18
#23
24 Jan 2015, 22:18#23
Oh puleeze Oom, you run away all the time. The last case being where you went on about ODI batsmen needing to be young to have fast relexes....and I pointed out the oldest guy in the top 10 was 38 and the average was 31. You just ran away like a coward.
But lets take your claim that you want to make the Board a better place at face value. Here is the very fair deal I am willing to make. I will cease using anybody's pejorative names. I will cease using any insults, I will just argue my point with logic.
You will cease using nasty stuff like "dof doos", moron, idiot and all the other slurs you use regularly. And when posters like Rooinek use terms like "moffie", make reference to aberrant male practices, religion and all the other lousy things they do.....you will remonstrate with them, the way you did when I used the terrible word " fartur".
If you are sincere this should be a good deal, simply indicate that you agree and we move to a new Board era.
But lets take your claim that you want to make the Board a better place at face value. Here is the very fair deal I am willing to make. I will cease using anybody's pejorative names. I will cease using any insults, I will just argue my point with logic.
You will cease using nasty stuff like "dof doos", moron, idiot and all the other slurs you use regularly. And when posters like Rooinek use terms like "moffie", make reference to aberrant male practices, religion and all the other lousy things they do.....you will remonstrate with them, the way you did when I used the terrible word " fartur".
If you are sincere this should be a good deal, simply indicate that you agree and we move to a new Board era.
Pro3,164 posts
24 Jan 2015, 22:35
#24
24 Jan 2015, 22:35#24
Sigh!!! The war still prevails....send Clean Cut, Rooinek and Saffex as the peacemakers...lolz
Coach57,555 posts
24 Jan 2015, 23:06
#25
24 Jan 2015, 23:06#25
Mozart
I accept all conditions laid down by you and wiill adhere to it. No more insults and stating only the point of view as to rugby and sport-related issues. I am sure we can find common ground on a lot of things and differ on most - so lets try and build mutual respect - which we had in the past and somehow got lost.
ASnd I will object if anybody call you Moffie on the sight. I normally do not discuss religion on the site and will refrain from it in future as well.
Have nice few weeks before the Cricket World Cup and Super 15 start.
I accept all conditions laid down by you and wiill adhere to it. No more insults and stating only the point of view as to rugby and sport-related issues. I am sure we can find common ground on a lot of things and differ on most - so lets try and build mutual respect - which we had in the past and somehow got lost.
ASnd I will object if anybody call you Moffie on the sight. I normally do not discuss religion on the site and will refrain from it in future as well.
Have nice few weeks before the Cricket World Cup and Super 15 start.
Captain49,914 posts
25 Jan 2015, 00:16
#26
25 Jan 2015, 00:16#26
Thanks Mike, same to you....I will also fully comply......let's see if we an get others to follow suit.
Captain18,570 posts
25 Jan 2015, 11:49
#27
25 Jan 2015, 11:49#27
Well said Moz & CleverMike. We are optimistic that this fragile peace agreement will last ...
Pro3,164 posts
25 Jan 2015, 14:39
#28
25 Jan 2015, 14:39#28
Well said.
Captain10,129 posts
26 Jan 2015, 05:13
#29
26 Jan 2015, 05:13#29
& we all lived happily ever after ..........
Captain18,117 posts
26 Jan 2015, 13:11
#30
26 Jan 2015, 13:11#30
Pffffffffffhahahahahaha!
"Boohoohoo . . . sniff . . . Rooinek is always so ugly to me . . . and . . . and . . . blubber, whine, sniff . . . he calls me Moffie! Boohoohoo! It's all so unfair. Sniff. Everyone should remonstrate with him. Sob, snivel, blubber . . ."
LMAO!
Moffie would have more chance of me complying if he wasn't such a despicable, deceitful, sneering and pompous old windbag. I'd need to see Moffie up his own game before I'd consider his plaintive and wheedling little demands.
"Boohoohoo . . . sniff . . . Rooinek is always so ugly to me . . . and . . . and . . . blubber, whine, sniff . . . he calls me Moffie! Boohoohoo! It's all so unfair. Sniff. Everyone should remonstrate with him. Sob, snivel, blubber . . ."
LMAO!
Moffie would have more chance of me complying if he wasn't such a despicable, deceitful, sneering and pompous old windbag. I'd need to see Moffie up his own game before I'd consider his plaintive and wheedling little demands.
Pro3,977 posts
26 Jan 2015, 14:33
#31
26 Jan 2015, 14:33#31
No man Rooi!!!!
You are the official spanner in the works!
You are the official spanner in the works!
Captain18,117 posts
26 Jan 2015, 14:51
#32
26 Jan 2015, 14:51#32
Bluebok, seriously now, would you prefer a feisty board with lots of stinging banter and barbs or would you prefer being part of a hand-holding circle-jerk where we all sing Kumbaya together?
Coach57,555 posts
26 Jan 2015, 15:23
#33
26 Jan 2015, 15:23#33
Rooinek
I agree with you often enough - but have to say that calling Mozart a Moffie is just not acceptable. You can call him anyhing you like - but that term has no substance according to indications insofar as Mozart personal life is concerned. Any other term - such as "windbag" - no problem with that.
I agree with you often enough - but have to say that calling Mozart a Moffie is just not acceptable. You can call him anyhing you like - but that term has no substance according to indications insofar as Mozart personal life is concerned. Any other term - such as "windbag" - no problem with that.
Pro3,977 posts
26 Jan 2015, 15:43
#34
26 Jan 2015, 15:43#34
I like the fireworks, else I wouldn't be here!!!
I am all for a good argument, sarcasm, sharp wit and whatever else it takes to get your point across, but name calling is hardly a measure of ones intellect.
By the way the "spanner in the works" comment was made while laughing at you giving the general pleasantness of the thread the finger.
I am all for a good argument, sarcasm, sharp wit and whatever else it takes to get your point across, but name calling is hardly a measure of ones intellect.
By the way the "spanner in the works" comment was made while laughing at you giving the general pleasantness of the thread the finger.
Coach57,555 posts
26 Jan 2015, 16:01
#35
26 Jan 2015, 16:01#35
Bluebok
Don't worry - there are plenty of interesting discussions where Mozart and I will be at each others throats. What has been agreed upon is that name-calling, degrading remarks on members and personal attacks are unacceptable methods for debating issues.
Mozart is not about to stop promoting players like Francois Steyn, Victor Mat field and Willem Alberts and I am not giving up on bringing reality to the fore. So expect some real sparring about contentious issues in the weeks to come.
Don't worry - there are plenty of interesting discussions where Mozart and I will be at each others throats. What has been agreed upon is that name-calling, degrading remarks on members and personal attacks are unacceptable methods for debating issues.
Mozart is not about to stop promoting players like Francois Steyn, Victor Mat field and Willem Alberts and I am not giving up on bringing reality to the fore. So expect some real sparring about contentious issues in the weeks to come.
Captain18,117 posts
26 Jan 2015, 16:11
#36
26 Jan 2015, 16:11#36
Ou Maaik, Moffie is lucky I call him Moffie as it only draws attention to his general foppishness, his affectation and his penchant for being a drama queen.
There is another more succinct and accurate word for people like Moffie . . . it starts with a "c" and rhymes with "hunt". Would you prefer if I called him that?
There is another more succinct and accurate word for people like Moffie . . . it starts with a "c" and rhymes with "hunt". Would you prefer if I called him that?
Captain49,914 posts
26 Jan 2015, 17:18
#37
26 Jan 2015, 17:18#37
Dear me, what a pickle for poor Rooinek. He is at a loss for words.
Captain12,893 posts
27 Jan 2015, 09:10
#38
27 Jan 2015, 09:10#38
"...a feisty board with lots of stinging banter and barbs..." oh so stinging banter is when you refer to my late parents as low life stock....I see.
Tell you what Cnut, my tolerance of you slagging off my late parents has evaporated.
The next time you do, whether it be veiled or otherwise or even just a mention, I'll slag off your mother, your late father and your wife.
And let me assure you that the level of slag will be a bottomless pit....and I won't stop until the walls of this forum goes into meltdown.
Got that....Cnut?
Captain18,117 posts
27 Jan 2015, 09:24
#39
27 Jan 2015, 09:24#39
Uh-oh . . . Dense showing off his complete lack of class again . . . what's new?
Captain40,032 posts
27 Jan 2015, 13:21
#40
27 Jan 2015, 13:21#40
Denny when did this insult occur. If years ago like I think then time to move on and not get so nasty.
↓ LOAD MORE (page 2 of 2)
