What a game of rugby. When coming from a game involving SA rugby, the difference is stunning. Another sport.
No matter the outcome, there is already a winner and that is the rugby game.
What a game of rugby. When coming from a game involving SA rugby, the difference is stunning. Another sport.
No matter the outcome, there is already a winner and that is the rugby game.
Ja Trad...we know Envy is a bitch.
Good try Allblacks!@!!
Good try Allblacks!@!!
Envy of what. For once, it would be better to accept the despair that is SA rugby and enjoy the rugby game offered by two rugby nations: Ireland and New Zealand.
What a game.
23-17...NZ will be back.
23 - 20
My feed fcing me around.
Ireland won.
What a game of rugby. It shows that NZ can be beaten playing rugby and the pretext used by SA rugby is empty, non existent.
Brilliant game, full of emotions, rugby won.
Mooo LA the ABS did their best.
Trad last time round we beat the wee abs.
Did you take your medications?
Tradhole...the Boks are better than the Micks...most of the time...
Trad last time round we beat the wee abs.
Th e games do not compare.
Ireland vs NZ reffing was good standards in the way it did not make the outcome.
SA rugby took their win by manipulating reffing. The win against NZ is tainted with heavy reffing influence.
This was an awesome rugby game. Pointless to drag it down into SA rugby misery.
That was the kind of games that win the heart and soul of people around the world, gaining fans.
What a promotion of the rugby game. NZ remains the ambassador of the game.
Perhaps "Razor" could energise the AB's more
Fossie is very knowledgable in a quiet analytical way but many think he lacks the "oomph" to inspire the NZ players. Don't know if there's any value in that.
Fan's tend to fall back on coaches very quickly when losses happen...SA is just as bad...often good coaches need time to build.
Unfortunately fans never have time and I believe that's a big problem. Never forget Ian Mac...most Shark players who played under him in those glorious days of Shark rugby, ie Pieter Muller said he was the best. When promoted to National coach however he was given the impossible task at that time to heal the disease of provincialism that prevailed in those days. It segmentated rugby. That buffoon Louis Luyt axed him because he was not given enough time.
I personally think it was an error, however Kitch Christie inherited some of his ground work and did a splendid job...most fans don't see it that way.
Would "Razor" be better? We honestly don't know but he could be...the trouble is when you change it has a negative effect as well.
Perhaps I'm talking out of turn and just guessing I suppose.
Or maybe times are a-changing, NH rugby is improving greatly and a bigger challenge to what is was in past. Ireland's and Scotland's rugby in on a different level today and it's not a flash in the pan.
