FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Is QB the most taxing position in sports?

Is QB the most taxing position in sports?

Started by Augenöffner21 REPLIES1,029 VIEWS· 13 Aug 2020, 10:27
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
13 Aug 2020, 10:27
#1
13 Aug 2020, 10:27#1

It is impossible to calculate which position in sport is the most mentally taxing.

How do you compare the mental acuity and natural agility of a top-level hockey goalie to the complex mapping required for a golfer to read the speed and undulation of a green? Or how do you compare the precision and fortitude it takes to step into a boxing ring to the skills of a biathlete, someone who must traverse snow-clad terrain, navigate a course, and then shoot at targets with world-class precision, steadying their nerves and focusing their breathing, all against the clock?

Claiming one is more mentally taxing than the other is like the local coffee shop near the train station that claims to have the best java in the world. Sure, it’s good – but the best in the world? Who did the research? What were the qualifications?

It certainly feels like an NFL quarterback has the most taxing job in sports. Nothing else approaches the scope and pressure of the position. QBs must have complete command of every detail of the playbook in order to orchestrate a top offense, while understanding the nuances of their system, their teammates and their opponents (and, of course, doing so while avoiding 280lb linemen trying to crush them into the turf).

And then there is the scrutiny from the media and fans, which has few parallels in the sports world. They are the team in many ways, even more so as the game and its rules swerve towards the offense. There is no separation of church and state – as the quarterback goes, so does the team.

Digesting the information on a quarterback’s plate is borderline impossible, and it’s what separates the very talented from the great.

Tom Brady will have more fun in Tampa, but will he win?

Tom Brady spoke about that difficulty last week. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers quarterback (that still sounds weird) is learning a new system and verbiage – a football language – as he prepares for the upcoming season.

“It’s been different having the opportunity over this time to move and to, for example, study my playbook – I mean I really haven’t had to do that in 19 years, so you forget, ‘Man, that’s really tough,’ like all of the different terminologies,” Brady told ESPN. “You’re going back a very long time in my career to really have to put the mental energy in like I did.”

It’s a curious decision for the Bucs to ask Brady, a greatest-of-all-time candidate, to conform to their playbook as opposed to asking him to install his own system, the one he spent two decades perfecting with the New England Patriots and helped bring his former team six Super Bowls.

When Peyton Manning opted to make Denver his home during his free-agent frenzy of 2012, part of his reasoning was that the organization committed to running things his way. Practice habits changed – Manning took every snap. The coaching staff adopted his system rather than vice versa. Players who didn’t fit the Manning Way were booted in favor of some of his trusty lieutenants.

Brady and the Bucs are going the other way. The veteran has had to learn a whole new language. And it is a language unto itself.

There are typically thousands of plays in an NFL playbook. The Rams’ famed 2001 playbook, that of the Greatest Show on Turf fame, had upwards of 3,000 individual calls. Yet only a fraction of a team’s playbook makes it onto the week-to-week playsheets, based on the tendencies of opponents, what has been working for the team, and the personnel available.

All that time, effort, and energy committed to a host of plays you may never use.

The language of playbooks has evolved, though.

In the vast majority of pre-2008 NFL offenses, every player on the offense was tasked with digesting every responsibility in every play in the playbook.

It was, and remains, a remarkably inefficient strategy. As plays become more advanced, the calls become even wordier. In a traditional “west coast” system, the system of choice from the 1980s to the 2000s and still a mainstay today, each individual’s role is detailed. A quarterback barking out “Jet Dart 368 Y-Flat Train” in the huddle is detailing to each of his 10 teammates the job of the offensive line, the receivers, tight ends, and running backs, plus any kind of pre-snap movement.

“‘Gun’ near RT Jet 2 Snag x Dragon”
“ZIP King Slot 21 ‘X’ Spot RB Sway”
“Zoom Change Right Flop 20 ‘X’ Spot FB Sway”

On and on they go. Snap after snap. When players say learning a new playbook is like learning a new language, they mean it.

But in New England, Bill Belichick installed a system around what are known as Erhardt-Perkins principles that put all of the mental strain on his quarterback. Brady was responsible for everything. He was given complete autonomy to adjust his team’s play based on how the opponent’s defence lined up on every down.

And rather than have Brady regurgitate full sentences every time they entered the huddle, the Patriots trimmed it to a word. The title of concept. Each player was told to worry only about their job within that title name, Brady would take care of the rest. If you’re on the field and Brady calls “Circus”, you should know where to be and what to do, but Brady would make sure the other nine roles all fit together.

Suddenly the playbook was trimmed from a splurge of sentences to one-word buzzwords: Romeo; Baltimore; Clown. All of the detail was in Brady’s head.

Think about that: the most detail-oriented team in US sports put the entire playbook in the head of one player, allowing his teammates to focus on themselves. It’s hard to come up with any kind of equivalent in team sport – at least in terms of so much being placed on the mental efforts of one individual.

Brady will now shift back to a word-dense system. After 20 years of stripping away the fat and crafting his own language, at 43 he must now learn a new one entirely. And the success or failure of his team will depend on him getting it right.

Maybe the initial question isn’t so difficult after all.

@TheGuardian
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
13 Aug 2020, 15:42
#2
13 Aug 2020, 15:42#2
Who gives a toss about AFL?
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
13 Aug 2020, 15:49
#3
13 Aug 2020, 15:49#3

Certainly very high pressure...scrumhalf and flyhalf combined, executing very complex patterns, with extreme timing. And the physical beating can be daunting.


But apart from the death defying sports like solo climbing, Golf would get my vote for most mentally taxing.....4 days or 20 hours of play.....and one mistake in almost 300 shots can cost the title.

DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
13 Aug 2020, 16:47
#4
13 Aug 2020, 16:47#4

"and one mistake in almost 300 shots can cost the title"

As opposed to one mistake costing you your life in free  solo climbing

CH
ChippoPro3,372 posts
13 Aug 2020, 17:50
#5
13 Aug 2020, 17:50#5

Very interesting topic here .

I guess when there is no rugby to speak about...

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
13 Aug 2020, 19:32
#6
13 Aug 2020, 19:32#6

I'm with Dave here . . . who gives a toss about Yankball?

When you have a team sport where one position is so much more important than all the other positions then you know it's a crap sport.

I realize Omlett-Angie is a bit dim but I'd expect even a drooling half-wit like him to have twigged there's a section for "Other Sport" by now.

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
13 Aug 2020, 21:51
#7
13 Aug 2020, 21:51#7

Peeper claims it’s a crap sport, Dave can’t give a toss and Chip on the shoulder ou is bored. Gosh what does that mean? Ummm...pretty much nothing?

CH
ChippoPro3,372 posts
13 Aug 2020, 22:41
#8
13 Aug 2020, 22:41#8

moz, hows the weather up in your crusty asshole this evening?

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
13 Aug 2020, 23:22
#9
13 Aug 2020, 23:22#9

Actually it’s not evening.....you have heard of the time difference?

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
14 Aug 2020, 00:29
#10
14 Aug 2020, 00:29#10

"I realize Omlett-Angie is a bit dim but I'd expect even a drooling half-wit like him to have twigged there's a section for "Other Sport" by now."

"Hey, anyone want to play chess?"

 Hook, line, sinker. On the same topic, for the fifth straight time. 


AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
14 Aug 2020, 00:34
#11
14 Aug 2020, 00:34#11

"Who gives a toss about AFL?"

Well. It happens to be NFL, not AFL. You must be confusing the Bisbane Broncos and the Perthburgh Steelers et al for an entirely different sport. I bet you are about to tell me that it was a typo, but then do explain how your finger strayed five columns and one row to A? 

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
14 Aug 2020, 00:41
#12
14 Aug 2020, 00:41#12

There is nothing quite as demanding in football or rugby. To make matter worse, the game is so heavily analyzed that there is no place to hide, and teams adapt quickly to even the most talented players. You can't hide like Steph, Lambie, Damian et al for years and be lauded. QBs have to be able to problem solve in roughly a couple of seconds. That means scanning the field as the rest of the players explode off the mark into their assignments. There is so much depth to the sport. It's contact chess. Every great attacking mind in both codes of rugby has shown an interest in the sport. A real coach will appreciate these things, and even be drawn to it. 

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
14 Aug 2020, 01:23
#13
14 Aug 2020, 01:23#13

The Duds certainly wouldn’t get the free pass they do with our sycophantic media and moronic fans! In the States the Welsh try would have been clearly analysed and Dud Toit’s non role exposed.

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
14 Aug 2020, 09:33
#14
14 Aug 2020, 09:33#14

I have never heard journalists or media types talk about the game the way the Americans talk about football (not soccer). It's a much more cerebral game with a very strong culture for the technicalities of the game. It's actually quite refreshing, as it's very hard to have an in depth discussion about rugby with most people. The knowledge base of the average fan is actually quite poor. The Americans on average can discuss all kinds of coverages, formations, plays and concepts, which makes for better discussion. The chaff is weeded out rather quickly, and the depth of information put out for the fans is amazing! 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
15 Aug 2020, 01:25
#15
15 Aug 2020, 01:25#15
AFL / NFL who gives a fuck - it’s a fucking boring game populated by many talentless fatties and the odd good athlete playing a boring game
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
15 Aug 2020, 01:39
#16
15 Aug 2020, 01:39#16

Piffle....a guy like Walter Peyton could have been the greatest centre of all time.....speed off the mark, a massive step and the power to run through a brick wall.

I prefer rugby...but football is highly professional and full of athletic talent.

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
15 Aug 2020, 01:59
#17
15 Aug 2020, 01:59#17

For a time the Patriots had an offensive line that was taller and more muscular than any Bok in history. Think about that. Ray Lewis was measured as having a greater force in a tackle than a multi-manned battering ram. The athletes in the NFL are rigorously examined and put through aptitude tests. Nothing in rugby comes close to it. They have greater athletes across a few NFL teams than the top 10 squads of tier 1 rugby union nations. The likes of Lood and Steph could never survive in any position. Not mentally, not physically. Whether you like the sport or not (most people would claim cricket is the dullest sport), it's appeal is growing around the world. The great minds of rugby union, especially attack gurus, love or appreciate it. 

AJ
AJHPro3,183 posts
16 Aug 2020, 17:17
#18
16 Aug 2020, 17:17#18

To me, the most taxing position in sport would be on any player who is wearing the #12 jersey and playing in the same team as Jantjies wearing #10.

But seriously I think a four-day golf tournament being in the leading group is, without doubt, the most taxing position to be in a sport.

The pressure that is applied by the media, other players, and the leader himself must be enormous and relentless.

How these guys stay focused is really amazing.

But in the end, the prize and fame make it all worthwhile. 


 

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
20 Aug 2020, 08:46
#19
20 Aug 2020, 08:46#19

I'd say that representing North Korea at ping pong is probably right up there.


AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
20 Aug 2020, 14:58
#20
20 Aug 2020, 14:58#20

That certainly is pressure! With a big, fat "Ich liebe Vater Kim so viel" smile on your face.

I find it funny though, that the members here who talk about innovative thinking and demand higher standards of coaching are the same people who rubbish sporting codes where these innovations are coming from. League is a huge influencer of Union. All the best attack coaches I have seen know league very well. 

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
20 Aug 2020, 15:53
#21
20 Aug 2020, 15:53#21

Aug, you'll find no arguments against NFL from me. 

I wish rugby and cricket coaching would be as detail orientated. Have said so quite a few times here before.

As far as the coverage goes, it's chalk and cheese. The interactive side of NFL viewing is next level.

A 10 needs a wider skillet than a QB though. Kinda like boxing versus MMA.

In rugby it's easier to make up for mistakes whereas in NFL everything is more precise, so that certainly ads to the pressure. 

SE
SebPro2,680 posts
20 Aug 2020, 16:13
#22
20 Aug 2020, 16:13#22

Aug you are most likely right.

Sports around the world come from many nations and preferences.

To reach accolades (with huge input of choice of population and of course money ) you can create sport teams that are the best. It has nothing to do with the strengths or abilities of the people.

Take for example, if the USA or Russia or China or whatever played rugby at fanatical and monetary level...who would dominate. We don't know exactly but it could be any one of those.

SA is a big player as is NZ, Eng, SA and Aus because it's played there with pride and not only this but money.

Grid iron undoubtedly will most times produce a very outstanding athlete.

I would not dare to compare...I don't like Grid Iron because I don't gel with it...but yes it has great athletes...of course it must have.


— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news