Jean is spot on
As we have thoroughly seen, the Bok midfield is a lower tier 2 entity. Unable to dictate terms physically and unable to create anything. The gameplan is also putrid. Damian botching every interaction with Am shows you the limitations of the personnel. It's a mess on and off the field.
I rate Jean but this is nonsense. . .name one test we won against the ABs in living memory with this box kicking.
I think Jean was stressing the point that kicking was always a play but the difference is that they would vary the play as apposed to just kicking possession away endlessly.
He is spot on.
Not kicking away each time you get the ball.
Also the point about Pollards play in the dying moments is correct.
I would love to see the ball fed to the backs to have a run instead of chasing a "up and under" with little hope of recovering possession.
We have two strong players at 12 and 13 who have strength and speed and 'BALLS".
One can sense Jean thinks our tactics would make the Neanderthals look up to date. But he doesn’t say it because we just can’t deal with constructive criticism. This is a huge cultural weakness in our rugby…..call it honestly, if you are proven wrong in the short term, persevere. If your ideas have value they will prove true eventually.
Yes, but to imply we always use box kicks as our default tactic is nonsense. Look at the match against the ABs in 98 posted on another string….we ran them into oblivion.
It was box kicks to set up other box kicks.
Running the ball when there are overlaps in the opposition half is non-negotiable.
Meyer and Jake White never run the ball in their own half but do so in the opposition half.
The South African DNA is to play no rugby in their own half, but attack from within the opposition half.
Even the All Blacks said they were surprised that the Boks were doing box kicks in their 22.
We only run under penalty advantage.
Jean said kicking is about field position, not the primary red zone threat. Aside from the kick and the maul, we haven't looked like creating even one try elsewhere. Once you are in good field position, other portions of your game need to be ready. From a gameplanning perspective. we simply aren't prepared for anything more.
If they are, where is it? Why aren't those structures successfully integrated? They occasionally deploy plays, shapes and patterns to get width; that's José trying his darndest to be threatening, but it is very poorly conceived and installed. They abandoned all of that for the All Black test. They put all of their eggs in one basket to beat the All Blacks, and became more linear. It shows you how little this coaching team has to offer us. They've made us worse than we've been since 2002.
Running game!!!!!!!!!
Not in the Springbok Coaches notebook I'm afraid.
Poor Willie's output has fallen off a cliff in the José years. He is being wasted. The few times the Boks had him come up fast in the middle of the field, he was exclusively used to chip towards the corner. What a damn waste. It amuses me, though, that everything Meyer was said to be has been made manifest in José and Krutch. The Boks are everything the plastiks accused Meyer's teams of being, down to the smallest detail and to the exact degree. Watching them squirm, trying to stay their condemnation, straining for a scapegoat... it's hilarious.

