Jordaan produces a remarkable set of stats...

It's not often a centre who was on the park much of the match has zero runs. This  one is a keeper...haha.P JordaanC00000000

 Did you actually watch the match?   

 J JonghC14831011

  Simple que stion goes unanswered - did you watch the match?

Nope, I will analyze it in due course....lets see....0 plus 0 equals zero....zero multiplied by zero equals zero....zero divided by zero, now it gets interesting. What is the value of 0 /0 Tokkie you plank?

 Your analysis is not worth reading - because you are the only member on this site  who analyses matches he has not seen.  I will do a worthwhile evaluation tomor row when the stats on the game has been updated.     

Boy you are one confused fellow, it's tomorrow already. 

 I will do the ana lysis on Monday 

 I must be going blind ,when I looked at the list of threads I thought it said "Jordaan produces a remarkable set of t!ts" Thought maybe it was steroidal man-boobs or summat !Mikey who is Ana Lysis and what are you doing to her on Monday ?

Mozart
You are always misrepresenting facts and then makes a huge fuzz about games you never saw.  This is just another example where you were caught out:-
*  Jordaan never got a single ball in the game and according to you he was supposed to carry balls nopt passed to him.
*   Jordaan made 12 tackles - missing none - so you made a total fool of yourself once again.  
This type of heading of this thread is absolute BS and you should by now have learned to avoid it, especially of you have not watched the game in question.  
  

 those are some awkward stats,...... not for Jordaan IMO but for the sharks as a team,..... what can a player do if he gets zero balls?

those stats shows that the sharks didn't run the ball at all,...... looking other players stats

                         K   P     R
C Reinach SH12 26   3J PietersenFH11  5   2W Roux     FB10  2   5
can be seen that they kicked almost every ball they got (aimless),...... and they didn't get too many balls coz the saders' set piece (and forwards' in overall) dominance.
As consequence the 5 centers and wings (including the bench man) made a total of 11 runs,.... compared with, e. g., the saders wings and centers' 34 runs

 Yep they played more enterprising rugby under Jake, and they got into the playoffs...this lot haven't even played overseas yet. So much for the great Bools/Sharks revolution.
As for Jordaan's no runs. Can you imagine Jean or Bryan O Driscoll or Nonu going for a game and not putting themselves in a position to take one pass. There were 49 runs and 52 passes, not a lot I grant, but every other Sharks back Managed at least one run.

This is passive rugby, rugby without vision.....process rugby. Effective players get themselves into the game.

 Mozart
Jordaan played at 12 and if he got NO Balls passed to him - how the hell must he geet balls.  Must he take up position between the flyhalf and the inside no 13 center?   Hell, why don't you think before writing BS on this site?     

Yes that makes sense, players must never stray from their set piece positions in a game.  If Jordaan ever found himself at first receiver during general play in the game would have to stop till Pieterson found his way back to flyhalf.
Nice try fat t!ts Tokkie