20 Jan 2015, 12:24#2
They would also be familiar with each others' strengths and weaknesses. Two, or three dogs, in this case, fighting over a bone...................
20 Jan 2015, 12:53#3
Good point Denny ... makes me wonder whether De Villiers was really that good ... or was it a matter of the bowling attack being so poor ... let's face it there were quite a few full tosses in the mix ... easy to dispense with ...
I wouldn't count my chickens quite yet ...
20 Jan 2015, 18:50#6
Chris G a y le would never bow to a batter if he reckons the guy is not good. Chris should know.
SHSharky54
Club Pro247 posts
SHSharky54Club Pro247 posts
20 Jan 2015, 18:58#7
Come now guys...we all know the problem with South Africa in world cup cricket has nothing to do with form or preparation - it has to do with CHOKING ! Almost every world cup we lose to k@k teams we are expected to beat. Not so ?
Our biggest threat is not Australia, England, India, Sri Lanka....
Our biggest threat is our own minds...
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
21 Jan 2015, 11:01#11
The shorter the duration of the game the more luck you need. What is really chocking sharktwit is when a young WP side travels to play the near full strength sharks in Durban and wins the Currie Cup! Test are the measure and we are number 1.Not too sure why anybody thinks Viv Richards was that good. Test average of 50.23. many guys have bettered that. We have three of the best in Ab, Amla and Faf.