FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Kriel is the one new player that could make a difference

Kriel is the one new player that could make a difference

Started by Mozart66 REPLIES1,166 VIEWS· 02 Nov 2014, 17:52
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,293 posts
03 Nov 2014, 22:40
#41
03 Nov 2014, 22:40#41
Kriel needs to prove he is not just a good Curry Cup player. I expect his time will be minimal on this tour, so he has next year in the SuperXV to prove he is not just a one season wonder Curry Cup Player
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
03 Nov 2014, 22:42
#42
03 Nov 2014, 22:42#42
 Kriel is far better than Louw or Schalk
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
03 Nov 2014, 22:57
#43
03 Nov 2014, 22:57#43
 Live and learn Stinkgat

Up front, JC van Rensburg returns to lead the side, with Jacobie Adriaanse joining him in the front row. One of CJ van der Linde or Pat Cilliers will be the reserve prop, again depending on the former’s fitness. It speaks volumes for the esteem in which Ackermann holds both van Rensburg and Adriaanse that he’ll pick them ahead of his two Bok props. At lock, Franco van der Merwe returns to join Micheal Rhodes, while Warren Whiteley and Baywatch Grobbelaar start in the back row, ahead of Derick Minnie and Willie Britz. Minnie makes the bench, along with Hendrik Roodt, while the likes of Britz and Paul Willemse are not quite so fortunate.

Lions: 15 Andries Coetzee, 14 Ruan Combrinck, 13 Jaco Taute, 12 Alwyn Hollenbach/ Dylan des Fountain, 11 Anthony Volmink, 10 Elton Jantjies, 9 Michael Bondesio, 8 Warren Whiteley, 7 Jaco Kriel, 6 Cobus Grobbelaar, 5 Franco van der Merwe, 4 Michael Rhodes, 3 Jacobie Adriaanse, 2 Callie Visagie, 1 JC Janse van Rensburg (captain)


CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
03 Nov 2014, 22:59
#44
03 Nov 2014, 22:59#44
 Methinks you are both not quite correct but Saff asking who Grobbelaar is, is quite disturbing. LOL. Kriel has come on off the bench at 7 a number of times in 2012 alone. Some e xamples.......... against the Reds in 2012 he replaced Grant Hattingh at 7 with Minnie at 6. Same against the Stormers with Minnie at 6 again. Against the Bulls he replaced Strauss at 8.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
03 Nov 2014, 23:08
#45
03 Nov 2014, 23:08#45
Oh boy we are talking present day, the season in which he made a name for himself.....not back in 2012 when he hardly featured.
There is a reason he has not played 7 in 2013 and 2014....you work it out cowardly old man.

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
03 Nov 2014, 23:10
#46
03 Nov 2014, 23:10#46
I guess it's been a long time since Baywatch was on one of Vetsak's lists.  
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
03 Nov 2014, 23:15
#47
03 Nov 2014, 23:15#47
At least if he did make my list it would have been in the correct position.
Moffie was it not you who had the prop numbers the wrong way around. Am sure Rooi took you to task on that? Or am I mistaken?
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
03 Nov 2014, 23:17
#48
03 Nov 2014, 23:17#48
 There is a good reason why I looked at 2012, ou Dawie. That was Baywatch' last season. I had a quick look to see if he and Kriel played together.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
03 Nov 2014, 23:22
#49
03 Nov 2014, 23:22#49
 You won't find Kriel at 7 in 2014 too often.....wonder why that is?
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Nov 2014, 02:25
#50
04 Nov 2014, 02:25#50
So just as I thought poor Vetsak is now making a big thing of 2014, when earlier he said this:
"  Moffie get this into your stupid head Kriel has never played 7, will never play 7 for the simple reason that if you are going to use him as a running flank it will be as a link player not a bruiser who is going to seek contact."



Yawn, and down goes the Vetsak.
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
04 Nov 2014, 08:34
#51
04 Nov 2014, 08:34#51
 
Huh??

Kriel has played a lot at blindside ... in fact he's been rather impressive there ...

He started at 7 for the Lions.

Not very attentive are we, Dave?

A powerful mother ... punches way above his weight. Don't regard him as a test blindsider though.

Openside flank comes naturally to him. Would give him the Bok 6 jersey in an instant.


SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
04 Nov 2014, 11:56
#52
04 Nov 2014, 11:56#52

Yes Moffie I was talking about this year.....the year Kriel made an impression and got selected for the Boks......I am not talking about 2012 when he could not make the Lions starting 15.......get it?

 

Not to mention the fact that we are talking about your ignorant call that Kriel should play 7 for the Boks now......stupidity of the highest order

 

CC stop speaking shit, Kriel did not start as a 7 

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
04 Nov 2014, 12:16
#53
04 Nov 2014, 12:16#53
 Oh dear. Here we go again. The case of the moving goal posts.


"The boks will get hammered week after week"............................... "No wait, I actually meant that they will get hammered week after week against Oz and NZ"



"Kriel has never played at 7"............. "No wait, I meant that he never played at 7, this year............"
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
04 Nov 2014, 12:20
#54
04 Nov 2014, 12:20#54
 
Come now Dave ... not only did he start at 7 but he played a lot at 7 with Minnie at 6 and Whitely at 8.

Wake up man!!

Oupa isn't Bok material. He's a quota pick. Nothing more.

 


CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
04 Nov 2014, 12:22
#55
04 Nov 2014, 12:22#55
 
Tell you one thing ... I'd rather have Kriel at 7 than Quota Oupa.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
04 Nov 2014, 12:51
#56
04 Nov 2014, 12:51#56

Wrong CC, Minnie played 7 with Kriel at 6

 

No Vlagshit, I am not talking about Kriel when he was a nobody and not featuring as a starter at the Lions......why would I you dunce?  

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
04 Nov 2014, 13:48
#57
04 Nov 2014, 13:48#57
 I also do not understand why you would do that Dave, but you just did, poepol.
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
04 Nov 2014, 13:54
#58
04 Nov 2014, 13:54#58
 
Your confused Dave ... again.

Kriel only played at 6 when Minnie was injured. When Minnie return from injury he was moved to 7 ... Ackerman in his wisdom then kept Kriel at 6.

Try to get it right will you?

 
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
04 Nov 2014, 14:18
#59
04 Nov 2014, 14:18#59
Which game this year did Kriel play 7?  
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
04 Nov 2014, 14:32
#60
04 Nov 2014, 14:32#60
 
Apologies Dave. I've tried to find all the teams sheets for this year but wasn't able to.

That which I did find has Kriel playing 6. Seems I'm mistaken.




MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Nov 2014, 15:11
#61
04 Nov 2014, 15:11#61

Now never doesn't mean never....hahahahahaha....defending the indefensible again Vetsak 

 

 

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
04 Nov 2014, 15:40
#62
04 Nov 2014, 15:40#62
I've just scrolled through the Lions team sheets for the Currie Cup and Super Rugby this year and I found a grand total of 1 game where Jaco Kriel wasn't wearing the #6 jersey and that was the Lions vs the Sharks on Friday 11 April when he was on the bench and Derrick Minnie wore the #6 jersey (for the only time in the season).

Kriel started every other game this season wearing the #6 jersey and I cannot find a single instance of him ever wearing the #7 jersey. Not one.

There's a very good reason why Jaco Kriel wore the #6 jersey in every game he started . . . he's a specialist fetcher with zero experience of playing on the blindside . . . not this year anyway.

Anyone who reckons Kriel doesn't compete on the ground or doesn't play the classic fetcher role for the Lions obviously hasn't watched a lot of rugby this season.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
04 Nov 2014, 17:50
#63
04 Nov 2014, 17:50#63

Yep and I have a feeling it was exactly the same in 2013.......but our resident rugby guru Mofgat wants him at 7 for the Boks.......go figure........can he be more bloody stupid?

 

Just shows how much this ignorant old fool actually knows about the game 

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
04 Nov 2014, 19:40
#64
04 Nov 2014, 19:40#64
Dave, never forget, we're talking about the same drooling half-wit who launched a vitriolic and scathing 8 year hate campaign against Jaque Fourie while he was one of the great Springbok centres - scoring 32 tries in 69 tests - and then, when Fourie returned to the Springboks as a washed up has-been after playing in the weak Japanese league, Moffie suddenly rated him for the first time ever.
LMAO!
Also, you were right earlier when you mentioned the fact that Moffie didn't know how the props were numbered until I set him straight some years ago.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Nov 2014, 22:19
#65
04 Nov 2014, 22:19#65

" With zero experience of playing on the blindside . . . not this year anyway."

 

Wehe....never means not this year.

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
05 Nov 2014, 07:24
#66
05 Nov 2014, 07:24#66
 
Now that that's been cleared up, can I take it an apology to Vetsak is in order?

I wonder how many others on this board deserve an apology from you, Arsehole??

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
06 Nov 2014, 00:49
#67
06 Nov 2014, 00:49#67

You ineffably stupid man Carbuncle....you shouted the odds about Kriel being a seven. I simply said two things....firstly his strongest suit is his running game....secondly that if he plays Bok fetcher(code for six) he will need another flanker who is strong on the deck to help.

 

 

I did, however, point out he has played seven in the past, which is of course totally accurate. The two inaccurate fools on this thread are Dave who said he never played seven....and you who said he mostly played seven with Minnie at six.

 

Now that's cleared up, a word of advice. Don't project your poor research on others.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news