Lambie's huge challenge

All his critics could be eating crow pie at the end of the season...he has a big mountain to climb..."Cometh the hour, cometh the man."

Could be...you could throw 6 sixes in a row. But in all likelihood Lambie will become smaller and smaller as the competition progresses. The problem being he has no flyhalf model...some guys pass, some kick, some run....Lambie gets stuck between these options. He is a decent enough fullback.

 The fool Mozart does not realize anything about rugby and is besotted with over-the-hill players.   

Better than being besotted by 15 year olds you Pathetic old Queen.

 You are the worst idiot I have ever come across in my life - reverting to lies to try and make a libelous point.    

 As Gekko said...if you stop telling lies about me, I will stop telling the truth about you

 When did I lie about you personally?   What I said about you being besotted about players you regard as greats and condemning about virtually everyone else is a definite.  

Well you called me the biggest idiot on the Board, when you yourself are on the Board. There's your lie right there Tokkie.

Am I the only poster here who finds Moffie's accusations a bit beyond the pale?
Not the first time this spiteful and deeply unpleasant person has implied that ou Maaik is some kind of paedophile or s3 xual deviant.
I don't think these type of comments are acceptable and I think they should be removed. This is a rugby forum, not a platform for a vindictive and extremely childish old man to spew his unsavoury accusations day after day and week after week.
If you disagree with someone then go ahead and argue your point and if someone drives you nuts then call him a name or two and throw a few insults . . . but implying that the other person is a paedophile is completely uncalled for and drags the tone of this entire forum into the gutter.
Ou Maaik may have annoyed a few posters over the years but he's never said anything that deserves this kind of disgusting filth. 
Enough is enough. If you agree with me then say something. If you think these kind of comments are okay then go ahead and condone them with your silence.

 Coming from the guy who in same sentence calls me a Moffie that's rich. Who for years has described...in detail....the supposed sexual acts other posters perform. Tell you what hypocrite, if it upsets you just have another drink.

 I agree its going too far rooiwtwit but its hilarious you pointing this outHahhahahahahahahahaha. Mike has also been name calling. You call Mozart Moffie rooitwit. Its all a bit hypocritical IF one thinks for even a moment!

As far as the Pervert is concerned he tracks every posting of mine on the Board and usually follows with a name calling attack. I have told him on many occasions I will ignore him if he ignores me....he refuses. He is obsessed. I also believe this old bachelor's obsession with youngsters and hatred of older players who  are in their way, is a pathological compulsion.

As for RooiAAS the man is not only a hypocrite, he is a stupid hypocrite blowing up his own case by doing exactly what he accuses others of doing.

Okay, so we have two people who think calling someone else a paedophile on a rugby message board is acceptable . . . what about everyone else?

 Mozart
I do not follow your comments on this site and then insult you on what you wrote - that definitely is not the case only with me - it applies to you as well.   

 Rubbish Pervert, you are a constant presence. To the extent that even if I'm not on a string you reference me. Case in point being the coach selection string where you gratuitously credit me with voting for Matfield in the coaching poll. Whereas I didn't even know there was a poll.
It's an obsession.

 Pretty low Moffie but its who you are

Low? That's your province Shorty.

 
We have a certain poster on here telling us all how he enjoys sodomizing his girlfriend. I don't recall anyone jumping up and down ... calling it unacceptable.

Wasn't it you, Redneck who told us that @nal sex was harmless and that you didn't have an issue with it?

Correct me if I'm wrong but I would seriously consider that as being hypocritical.

Both are repulsive in my view.

That however won't stop me from discussing your so called preferences on this board.

Pedophilia seems to be a particularly sensitive issue with you.

I shan't ask why.

Don't know what you're banging on about Klown but please, I don't need any more detail thanks. I'll just chalk you up as a sad and disturbed loser who thinks paedoph ilia can be compared with consensual s3x between adults.

"I'll just chalk you up as a sad and disturbed loser who thinks paedophilia can be compared with consensual s3x between adults." Pretty much sums you up CC.

Also, at least Mike and Moz keep the board going. Neither of them seems too upset by the names they call each other. Actually, I dont think either of them would like to see the other leave the board. Moz is Ying to Mike's Yang haha. But seriously, for me you guys can call each other any names you like. As long as you don't become so defensive that you stop wanting to share your thoughts. Not only rugby related ones but general stuff too. I think you both have some good tales to tell and I'd personally like to hear more of then. Sounds like an AA meeting :)

An AA meeting? Where is RooiAAS?

 Plum
After the fool he made last year in his all-out support of Meyer and his pets Matfield, Alberts, Jannie and co - the only weapon Mozart has left is to be as obnoxious as possible with his personal remarks - I just ignore his allegations of which he has no proof whatsoever.   
If he can come up with reasonable assessments of what problems SA Rugby and Cricket face and shy away from his personal attacks on individual players it would help a lot in debating issues - but he does not and end up with individual attacks on players and on members who disagree with his petty remarks.  
It at times upset me a bit - but generally I take it from whence it comes.        

The hypocrisy is epic.

Dead man walking prefers Morne over Lambie......enough said