FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Life with the site "experts" is always entertaining

Life with the site "experts" is always entertaining

Started by clevermike7 REPLIES798 VIEWS· 11 Aug 2019, 01:06
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
11 Aug 2019, 01:06
#1
11 Aug 2019, 01:06#1

The RC normally comprises of a six match to be played by each team,   In WC years the number of games is reduce to 3.

So since the start of the RC in 2012 we have two years only when the WC influenced the length of the RC - namely 2015 and 2019.  So lets start with that and go on with further wisdoms expressed by our "experts",


The score comparisons are as follow: -  


     Year         Game  Against        Score                 Point difference    


    2015          New Zealand        27 - 20                          -   7 

                     Australia              24 - 20                          -   4

                     Argentina             37 - 25                          - 12  


    2019          New Zealand        16 - 16                          nill

                     Australia               17 - 35                            18

                     Argentina              13 - 46                            33


The "experts" claimed that the 2015 players were better than the present team and the present coach is incompetent  and not capable of coaching teams - the attacks on the coach were  relentless and vicious, same in respect of the players.   


But then how do one account for the fact that in 2015 the Springboks lost all three RC games with a negative point difference of 23.  In 2019 the Springboks convincingly won two matches and drew the third.  The point difference was + 51.   Did they know anything at all about the coach and players,


Other than the above our "dear experts"  predicted that SA would be last on the log.   Huge difference between last on the log and winning the Trophy.  One wonders how the three "experts" would  manage to explain that,                  

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
11 Aug 2019, 01:11
#2
11 Aug 2019, 01:11#2

"So since the start of the RC in 2012 we have two years only when the WC influenced the length of the RC - namely 2015 and 2019. "

What a brilliant conclusion. 


CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
11 Aug 2019, 01:17
#3
11 Aug 2019, 01:17#3

Ceradunce 

You are too moronic to be an Idiot Speaker like our "experts" are, 

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
11 Aug 2019, 02:56
#4
11 Aug 2019, 02:56#4
Hmm.....how do we account for that? Well maybe NZ was a much better team in 2015. And maybe we played Oz in Oz where we rarely beat them. And maybe Argentina had a dominating scrum with the best loosehead in the game, instead of a totally disfunctional unit that has taken them out of their last two tests. In other words....the circumstances were different. Or maybe Vermeulen is an even better player now that he has fully matured. Or maybe Eraser is a genius. We'll know the answer if we kick on from the semis.
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,250 posts
11 Aug 2019, 03:07
#5
11 Aug 2019, 03:07#5

clevermike

Hall Of Fame

36912 posts

Aug 11, 2019, 01:06.

 So lets start with that and go on with further wisdoms expressed by our "expert". 

So since the start of the RC in 2012 we have 2 WC that influenced the length of the RC - namely 2015 and 2019. 

So, 1 + 1 = 2

 0 0 Likes

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
11 Aug 2019, 08:44
#6
11 Aug 2019, 08:44#6

Mozart

I will add the following to your maybe's:-

"Maybe we were writing kak all along"  

That would at least be an honest assessment of what you and the other "experts: produced on site,  

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
11 Aug 2019, 10:27
#7
11 Aug 2019, 10:27#7

I did try to warn the oaks. Sigh 

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
11 Aug 2019, 16:21
#8
11 Aug 2019, 16:21#8

I have covered this time and time again. It's becoming a bore having to essentially repost the same information month after month. 

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news