Man of the Match award - Cricket match in Hamilton

Guess who - another of our friend Mozart pet hates - De Kock.  He was quick to go with a praise-song on Amla last Friday - and some negative comment on De Kock.   However, not a word today.

 Quinton is world class...period. You know, I know it.

Not a negative comment Tokkie a factual comment....I simply said 'de Kock not so much' after he was dismissed for zippo. But hey, I thought you told us there wasn't going to be game....were you dead wrong again?

 Why then did you not comment on other players with low scores and only on De Kock?   Your own actions indicate your afflictions with prejudice.

 Nope your attitudes reflect an 'emotional' thinker. A person whose brain is clouded with likes and dislikes and silly emotional beliefs. I deal in facts....he made zippo. Nobody else made zippo, none of the other first 5 batsmen made less than a quarter ton in fact. That doesn't mean he isn't in good form, it simply means on the day he made zippo. His average over the SriLankan series and early NZ games is almost 48. Nobody could complain about that.

 Mozart
The problem is that it has been proven over years that you fiddle facts to fit in with your prejudice against certain sportsmen - and that does bot only apply to rugby - but all codes of sport.
Cold facts have never been your forte.

You have never caught me fiddling facts.....because I don't. Nor have I ever been proven to lie on these Boards....because I don't.

Fiddle with facts - the most famous case is Fat Fransie ESPN stats - where you came up with the classic that Stats do not reflect his real value to teams, so it must be ignored.   And your description of what happened during matches is a joke and factually flawed.
You do not lie - but distort the truth to such an extent that it represents falsehoods.    

Fiddle with facts - the most famous case is Fat Fransie ESPN stats - where you came up with the classic that Stats do not reflect his real value to teams, so it must be ignored.   And your description of what happened during matches is a joke and factually flawed.
You do not lie - but distort the truth to such an extent that it represents falsehoods.    

Well there were no lies, no dostorted facts....just opinions which everybody is entitled to........and all pails into insignificance in comparison to your disastrous lies. Like the time you told us what a terrible game Jacobs had against Oz, when he wasn't even playing in that hame. Now run off and play Fantasy Rugby you old coot

 There were plenty of distorted (no dostorted?) facts - thin wrists, thin and long necks, etc.   Your lies are all covered by the so-called personal opinion rubbish - so that is an excuse that has been used whenever you think the truth is so precious, you must not abuse it by frequent use. 
By the way fan tasy comps show some knowledge of rugby, cricket and other codes of sport - something you know nothing about.