SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
15 Feb 2016, 00:27#1
You ignorant twat......so lets compare the other blindsides this weekend in the 6N......and remember is was only Ireland and France that played in the rain.
CJ - 14m gained, 1 defender beaten
Lauret - 13m gained, 1 defender beaten
Robshaw - 4m gained, 0 defenders beaten
Warburton - 0m gained, 0 defenders beaten
You get the picture idiot?
In the same Ireland team.....fellow loosies achieved the following:
Heaslip 2m gained
O'Brien 16m gained
You worked out the roles of loosies in terms of metres gained yet old man......that in NH conditions huh?
Talk about stupid....imagine interpreting loosies stats like that of a back who runs in space
Old Moffie must think that the modern game is played by super human forwards who with ball in hand gain 10m per run operating in traffic....or conversely, defenders are so bad that they find it impossible to stop a player that runs straight into him.
Moffie......when you as a player are tasked with taking the ball up in traffic and setting up another phase, gaining half a metre per carry is about par.....that hardly applies to a back operating in space, or a 8 taking the ball from the base of a scrum or a 6 playing a linking role.
Do you know anything about rugby?
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
15 Feb 2016, 01:22#2
Mozart
What Mozart has cottoned on as rugby is scrums. line-outs - passing the ball sometimes to the flyhalfs who must kick away balls 90% of the time or more frequently passing the ball back to the forwards. Backlines are there to defend only.- that is about the sum-total of what Mozart knows about rugby. In local parlance that is known as "stampkar" rugby - a prototype Meyer and Ludeke were addicted to as well.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
15 Feb 2016, 01:37#3
Moffie has absolutely no grasp of the difference between a forward operating in traffic and one operating in space....ie a blindside vs an openside or 8
Ignorant as fuck
I mean, imagine being stupid enough to expect the likes of CJ, Etzebeth, Lood etc gaining say 2m a carry when taking contact.......hell if a monster like Etzebeth cant bash through players everytime he takes contact how are other players meant to?
This ignorant fool judges a blindsides stats like that of a centre or wing.
One would swear that 1m/2m/half a metre makes that much of a difference in traffic....as long as the player gets over the advantage line and sets up the next phase, his job is done......hellooooooo.....how obvious is that?
This idiots ignorance is embarrassing.......is he really this stupid? Hell just look at what the other 6N blindsides achieved......its the norm.....but this ignorant twat has the audacity to tell us CJ is not good enough to be a Bok.....because he is so fucking stupid that he cant attach relevance to stats
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
15 Feb 2016, 04:23#4
So 14m gained in 19 runs and two ball losses, is a good performance.....hahaha....the guy can't beat a tackle. He is bog ordinary.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
15 Feb 2016, 07:21#5
Mozart
So the guy cannot beat a tackle - but neither can Alberts - who you supported so enthusiastically. The difference is that Stander made four times the number of carries Alberts made and that he also makes three times the number of tackles Alberts made.
Sorry to differ - but you are making statements that do not hold water because you dislike Stander and adore the useless non-loosie Alberts.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
15 Feb 2016, 15:52#6
C J Stampkar is bog ordinary.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
15 Feb 2016, 23:06#8
Moffie confirming he knows fuck all about rugby....so Moffie talk us through the stats of the other blindsides this weekend dumbass.
Owned again....lost 2 balls gained one ignorant twat and 14 m gained in traffic is good it means he breaches the advantage line every time.
CJ is a class act better than Schalk or Alberts by a country mile.
Better than Vermeulen right now. Would have been my Bok captain right now
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
15 Feb 2016, 23:07#9
He did beat a tackle dumb fuck
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
15 Feb 2016, 23:23#10
CJ Stampkar is another in your long list of loosies, who the coaches were supposedly stupid not to play for the Boks. This list of failures includes.....Luke Watson, Strauss, Kolisi, Lappies Labuschagne, Arno Botha, Jacques du Plessis etc. Stampkar is just the latest nonentity.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
15 Feb 2016, 23:30#11
Moffie the only failures are your pathetic picks which mirror that of our last coach who went running because he could not crack it at test level...a complete loser like you....the kind of idiot who informs CJ he is too small to play test rugby...the same guy who stands 1.89m and weighs 115kg....the same guy who was Munster player of the year and won MOM on his test debut.
Only a loser like you would call such a player bog ordinary....for you really are rugby ignorant and I mean that sincerely
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
16 Feb 2016, 00:49#12
Stampkar would have zero chance of making any of the SH test squads, not even the Bargies who would have him for breakfast.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
16 Feb 2016, 00:55#13
Moffie like I said you are a loser like Meyer was...same conservatism and ignorance.
A quality coach would have CJ starting for his Bok side....not washed up has beens like Schalk and Alberts.
Stampkar...is that the scribe in you again....bwhaaahaaaaa......let me guess in your books a blindside plays it wide acts as a link player....bwhaaahaaaaa.....clueless