BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
07 Aug 2014, 00:27#82
Rooitwit you are confused when sarugby.net closed down we all went to supersport. Surely you must remember that?
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
07 Aug 2014, 02:12#83
As I recall it the initial experience was on Supersport, followed SA Rugby.net, which then closed the website. We then went back to Supersport, which then closed its website. After that we had Supersupporter, followed by this site. But as a US politician recently said...what difference does it make? RooiAAS was a mug on every Board.
BObobbok...
Captain10,129 posts
BObobbok...Captain10,129 posts
07 Aug 2014, 04:04#84
Klop to Mozart's version.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
07 Aug 2014, 04:44#86
Gosh Blikkies spending all that time with good blokes like you and Blob brings a tear to my eye. Perhaps we should all suspend hostilities for a day and have a little celebration.
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
07 Aug 2014, 09:19#87
Ceradunce: "It eventually turned out to hhave been your own devious little making. "
Really? When did this come to light? Is this what one of the Kamp SS Obergruppenfuhrers told you or is it something you can prove?
Here's the truth . . . your pal Untergruppenfuhrer Hawkeye edited my post and then, after I confronted him (based on the fact that the words "Edited by Hawkeye" were at the bottom of my post that now contained the word "c*nt"), he ran away like a blubbering crybaby and only returned weeks later after Obergruppenfuhrer Von Barlee had banned me for daring to complain about Hawkeye's disgusting behaviour. Nothing devious from me, Ceradunce, and no editing on my part. That's just a barefaced lie.
As for my question now, I'm not asking you to admit to making a mistake, you silly little man. Read what I asked again . . . or get someone who understands English to explain it to you . . . I'm simply asking you if you believe I owe you some kind of apology.
Got it now, Ceradunce? Would you like me to ask it in another language?
Be a big brave boy and at least attempt to answer the question . . . or at the very least, stop droning on like a sanctimonious little bitch when other people duck and dive your questions.
JWJust_win
Captain18,570 posts
JWJust_winCaptain18,570 posts
07 Aug 2014, 10:03#88
Beeno: if your nick was based on the comic book character you got off to a rough start typo-wise as you spell is "Beano" not Beeno. Ah, well & so it began. lol
Good to read the history of some of the posters on this site. You guys have been slugging away at each other all over cyberspace & leaving dead sites in your wake. A basis for a book? Someone give Rosemarie a call, lol
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
07 Aug 2014, 10:21#90
Sorry but not so. I started my rugby posting career on SA Rugby.net.
It was there I met rooitwit for the first time. He joined the SA Rugby.net board after I had. That older posters may have first been on superpsort and migrated to Sa Rugby.net is irrelevant to what we are talking about.Anyhow thats how I fecall it
Blikkies please oak I registered as Beeno and have not changed since then.
Rooitwit I have no problem at all in accepting what you say. Hawkeye changed peoples posts, moved them to other boards, disclosed private details and even deleted crucial posts. He is a big reason the board went south. Barlee went along with his conniving. The ruins are the result of this disgracefully dishonest behaviour together with treating the board as his private house where folk were to be ever so thankful for the privilege of being allowed to post there. Add bias in and one had a totally disasterous approach. Huge pity as a great bunch had gathered there when the huge Supersport board closed.
Not sure if they have learned any lessons yet. I tried to get them on the right path last time I was on that board but it was cut short when I was banned due to the squealing of that noted crybaby tai pansy. 5th banning I think it was. Hahahhahahahahaha
Ah yes I remember it well!
Agree Moz, Bobbok is an excellent guy and always has been.
JW some of us go back more than ten years! You would not think one could squabble or so long!
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
07 Aug 2014, 10:34#91
Jw the arrival of you kbbs has added and new dimension to the squabbles or banter!
I wonder if it will prove to much for our more senstive kiwis. Can they keep going in such a cantankerous environment? However we are not entirely to blame as I see even the charming Cloudy delights in having a go against the wallietongan boguns!As long as things dont get all bitter its all a heap of fun.
If snapster didnt have someone to cuss at he would be a more miserable fellow! Ditto ou rooitwit who loves nothing better than to take some poor pompous (In his view) and ofttimes unsuspecting oak down a peg or two.Then we have the more subtle stirrers and amateur stirrers. We also have multies and moles and one has to be on guard at all times.
This is not a vicars tea party oaks so batten down and toughen up!!!!!!
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
07 Aug 2014, 10:37#92
"Sorry but not so. I started my rugby posting career on SA Rugby.net."
Baboon-ou, you are delusional. You were posting on the Supersport board as "Beeno" (and I suspect as "James No-one" as well) around 1999/2000 long before any of us had ever been to SARugby.net.
Do you remember posters called Baard and Weepy? Yes? I see you nodding your silly little head . . . well, neither of those two ever made it across to SARugby.net so you knew them from Supersport.com.
I see some of the other old-timers are talking about a return to Supersport.com after the initial exodus when they banned overseas-based posters. For the record, I never went back to the Supersport board after that. I went from Planet Rugby to Supersport to SARugby to Kamp SS and then nowhere for some years until I found Baboon-ou's link to this board on Planet Rugby.
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
07 Aug 2014, 10:53#93
Well whatever the case you posted on SA Rugby. net.
Be ever thankful I rescued yopu from the wilderness rooitwit.Eeks what have I done! etc
Rosemarie and anybody interested in studying abnormal behaviour would have a field day here!
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
07 Aug 2014, 11:02#94
I remember Baard and Wee Pee etc rooitwit they posted on Sa Rugby.Net. Look its possible i may have posted very briefly on Supersport before moving to SA Rugby .net but it must have been, for me, very brief.
Do you concede the distinction between Sarugby.net and SaRugby.com? Fundamental rooitwit fundamental.
BObobbok...
Captain10,129 posts
BObobbok...Captain10,129 posts
07 Aug 2014, 11:13#97
Beano, I'm tjommies with everyone on this thread ........ I think Rooinek's correct & 'twas Supersport where we first said howzit or voetsak .
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
07 Aug 2014, 11:24#98
OkayBobok maybe time has done its thing. However ou rooitwit has very little to crow about as he never knew we were on SARUgby .NET Hahahhahaahhahaha
JW you kiwis do add a balance to the excellence of the Saffa posters if you get my drift. FINER BUNCH OF SQUABBLERS YOU NE'ER SHALL FIND!
Cloudy I suspect ou Gonzo ou is just warming up!!! Great addition to the board and a first class nutter!
I am watching for any signs of deterioration in Bobbok Cloudy - how long can he last! He used to have a nice avatar but look at what he has got now. Its all indicative. Get a grip Bobbok.
07 Aug 2014, 12:06#99
@Rooidrol. I get the distinct idea that you have been assuming something, and you know what they say about assumption. It seems to be true in this case.
"As for my question now, I'm not asking you to admit to making a
mistake, you silly little man. Read what I asked again . . . or get
someone who understands English to explain it to you . . . I'm simply
asking you if you believe I owe you some kind of apology.
Got it now, Ceradunce? Would you like me to ask it in another language?
Be
a big brave boy and at least attempt to answer the question . . . or at
the very least, stop droning on like a sanctimonious little bitch when
other people duck and dive your questions."
I do not know what you are on about, unless you have assumed that I have asked you to do something when, in fact, I actually made a statement. I haven't asked you to do anything. I said that you are not familiar with the practice of apologising. You just do not do the apology thing.
This was what I said:
"Keep on reminding ou Rooidrol. I don't care. You might have missed it
but I have admitted that I got it wrong, and I even apologised. That is
of course something that you would not understand..... the apologise
thing, that is, being the hypocrite that you are and all. "
Now it is your turn if you are a man, to answer a question. Did I say that you needed to apologise for something or did you assume that there was something that I wanted you to apologise about?
The matter of the so-called edit was not taken any further because you pissed off. There is strong suspicion that there never was any edit done to your post. It was, at the time, not investigated any further because you did not have the balls to stay and "state your case", you decided to rather piss off and start your little rage campaign from here. Why? Did you know that you were going to be exposed?
Someone else on here was pissed of because a thread was moved to another section. Before he moved on, he argued his point about the thread being moved and he felt strong about it. When he realised there was no common ground, about moving or not moving the thread, he decided to move on and first made his intentions clear and then moved on. Respect.
The very same person at some stage made an allegation against me and probably "his worst enemy" on that board. He was wrong. I pointed it out to him in a PM. He did not respond to me in the PM. Instead, went back onto the thread and without long-winded excuses or ducking and diving or wonky explanations, he apologised unconditionally to both me and the other guy. Respect.
Now also please note, the last paragraph is not a "hidden message" or a request for you to apologise for something either. Just in case you get over energetic and start jumping (to conclusions) again.
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
07 Aug 2014, 12:48#100
"The matter of the so-called edit was not taken any further because you
pissed off. There is strong suspicion that there never was any edit done
to your post. It was, at the time, not investigated any further because
you did not have the balls to stay and "state your case", you decided
to rather piss off and start your little rage campaign from here. Why?
Did you know that you were going to be exposed?"
I pissed off? I was banned you moron. Ask Obergruppenfuhrer Von Barlee. He banned me until I responded to some mail that was sent to an account that I only look at once in a blue moon. I couldn't "state my case" because I had no access . . . and furthermore, when your cowardly little pal Untergruppenfuhrer Hawkeye finally returned (after I was banned), the very first thing the trembling little coward did was to alter my post count so that not only could I not defend myself, I couldn't even read the Gossip forum.
Do you seriously not know any of this? LMAO! Yet here you are with these very strong and emotional opinions. It beggars belief!
As to your question, it's actually very simple if you just stop being so evasive and defensive . . . you called me a hypocrite because I never apologise. (Fact). The clear implication (for anyone with a double-digit IQ anyway) is that I owe you an apology.
For the 3rd (and last) time, what do I owe you an apology for? Please answer the question before obfuscating things and asking new questions of your own. That's the kind of thing a pathetic little child does . . . or sad losers like moffie and Drivelling Avocado. You're very close to joining them on my shitlist . . . you just need to ask a new question one more time without having the guts or the integrity to finish the current discussion.
GEgeneraltit
Pro3,164 posts
07 Aug 2014, 13:26#102
What a history of disputes,back stabbers,petty issues from rugby men??? Worst than a lot of teenage girls locked away at boarding school !
Also some real nasty sounding ones...Barlee,Hawkeye,Bedpan,Taipan to mention a few...real psychos...Bedpan,oh my gosh how funny definitely an escapee from the Fort Napier in Maritzburg...bedpans are used in hospitals...cuckoos nests etc...lolz.
I thought rugby was meant to be watched and enjoyed and appreciated but the way some behave and how it appears to make some entirely unhappy and neurotic one wonders why these sorts bother to watch and follow it at all...unless ofcourse you get those weirdos that actually enjoy being unhappy...really a lot of loose screws rattling around upstairs.
I must say that the NZ guys are much better than the Saffas...more calm and decent and not panic mechanics like Saffas when it comes to issues both on the field and off...perhaps SA's have become panickers due to our insecurity and uncertainties... coaches and rugby players as well...said this in a type of sarcastic jest but maybe there's an underlying element of truth in this...
07 Aug 2014, 13:32#103
Bullshit, Rooinek, and you know it. The entire issue of the "banning" was resolved. The problem lies with your own stupidity. Barlee wanted to verify that it was you and responded with an email to YOU to an email address that YOU supplied as being YOUR CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS and then YOU did not respond too his emails because YOU do not USE THE EMAIL ADDRESS that YOU supplied as YOUR CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS. And then you blame Barlee because YOU do not USE YOUR CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS.
How fucking logical is that? You have been told, after I intervened, that the banning has been lifted as well as the reasons why it was done as an interim measure.
Just in case you try to, once again, make something out of nothing...... these were the circumstances. The post, posted by "you", appeared that was out of character. There was an immediate suspicion that it could have been someone who has hacked into the site before. Your account was suspended to make sure that it was indeed you. Barlee then sent you the email referred to above. When you did not respond he accepted that it confirmed the suspicions. We then started discussing the issue on here and you denied having received an email. It was only then that you discovered that "Barlee was stupid enough not to know that you do not use the email address that you supplied". You accused Barlee of bullshitting about sending you an email while you have actually received the email and just failed to read it. You left it there without a peep. See what I mean about apology?
When the above, about the email address, came to light, your account was immediately restored, and you know it.
Rooinek
Member Since 10 Aug 2010
Offline
Last Active Jul 11 2014 12:27 PM
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
07 Aug 2014, 15:26#105
Complete and utter bullshit, Ceradunce. All of it.
I don't know why you insist on defending the indefensible . . . I mean really, one mod editing my post to add swear words and then the other mod not only banning me but putting my real name up on the website after he requested what I thought would be confidential proof ! Whoever heard of such disgusting behaviour . . . and what kind of person would defend it?
Your version of events is a complete fabrication and I don't know if
it's based on lies from Barlee and Hawkeye or if it's your own bullshit. Either way, spare me your crap about how you intervened on my behalf and all that other meaningless garbage you're spouting that I'm not even bothering to read. I don't care enough to get into some stupid debate with you . . . I've seen for myself how unreasonable, self-righteous and obsessive you get.
Ceradunce, I don't think I've ever seen anything of any rugby interest you've ever put up on this or any other message other than your continual foot-stamping and whining at ou Maaik so really, just shut your deceitful little gob from now on and stay out of my way on this board.
Okay? I'll do likewise . . . and unlike you, I'm not a coward or a liar. Now shove off!
Wanker . . .
07 Aug 2014, 16:06#108
Ceradyne's version of events is 100% correct and honest. The only coward and liar is the obnoxious, unpleasant arsehole, Rooitwat.
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
07 Aug 2014, 16:10#109
Wehe . . . "Stew Mole"!
I see I'm a real hit with the Kamp SS moles!
Hmmm . . . now which one of the moles was it that I called an "unpleasant arsehole" not very long ago? Let me think . . .
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
07 Aug 2014, 17:32#111
Roooitwit when I was first banned from kamp ss they told the folk I had left of my own accord!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I have absolutely no difficulty in accepting your statements.
The worst however was when trouble was looming I warned them that if they banned me before I could defend myself against false accusations I would post my defence on Keo. They banned me and I posted my defence on keo. But what these cases did was delete my post warning them shortly after I had made it!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Purpose make me look like a trouble maker. My personal details were also disclosed, as was my place of work and my boss.This twit cerdunce windpomp tried to argue that because hawkeye had used my email address to track me down and find out my place of work and confirm that I was, AS I HAD ALREADY DISCLOSED TO THE BOARD A CA it was therefore fine for hawkeye to disclose my prvate detailS. I KID YOU NOT. SO AGAIN I HAVE NO DIFFICULTY WHATSOEVER IN ACCEPTING THAT WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE. FACT IS AMY FOLK HAD THER POSTS CHANGED AND MOVED. FAct is many folk got fed up and shoved off.
Further when on kamp SS on that last occassion I was again attacked about defending myself on Keo, I asked hawker and barlee to bring up posts that proved what I was saying that would end all argument but they would not neither wold they help re other posts. They preferred that the lies should reign. Back on this board I asked Cerudunce wimdpomp why he had not used his computer skills to dig up my post. Windpomp when I challenged him on this said why should he help me. You see rooitwit you are wasting your time hoping to find truth in this regard from windpomp. His support for kamp ss is regardless of truth.
Just be very thankful we dont have this rubbish here to deal with. Then when objecting to the nonsense getting banned etc.
I have no time at all for behaviour like that.
Bwhahahahaha now we have Stu here as a mole. Stu if it's you didn't you register here as Stu5. Could this mole have caught himself out so early?
Wonder when DA and The Truth will confess to their true identity. They sure are two very scar ed cats!
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
07 Aug 2014, 17:43#116
Cloudy and JW, please be assured that the kbbs are only amateur squablers. You could improve with time.
Rooitwit is actually exposing the shocking behaviour we had to put up with on kamp ss.
I have never seen this sort of thing anyhwere else. That ou cerudunce windpomp tries to defend it is beyond belief.
I suppose if hawkeye and barlee came clean and apologised it might put all this to bed.Zero chances of that.
I do think though that barlee and hawkeye managed to fool a number of people using decitful means. They also thought by cutting us off the truth would never come out. However the truth will out.
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
07 Aug 2014, 17:48#117
Dont cry windpomp but learn your lessons and in future try and support the truth.
What happened on kamp ss was a disgrace. The fruits of it are there for all to see.
So well said Rooitwit!! Tell it like it is.
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
07 Aug 2014, 17:49#118
Off for a good game of tennis!
JW no let up on the mo les oak!
07 Aug 2014, 17:50#119
"I suppose if hawkeye and barlee came clean and apologised it might put all this to bed."
