The Boks win ratio was exactly the same when Harrassmiss was gone as it was when he was the water boy. The real question is can the Boks function without Nienaber. My guess is he is the guy who saves a lot of Eluckmiss’s nutty ideas and makes sure all the practical things get done.
Moz in your opinion
But without Eluckmiss his win ratio was exactly the same as the two together. So who is Master and who is blaster. Time will tell.
9 wins and 7losses for Nienaber, within a percentage point of Erasmus’ win/loss record for non WC years. And Nienaber was there by himself….master always had blaster.
Davce
Forget about responding to Mozart BS - the bloody idiot at one stage was using club and franchise performances to evaluate player ability and th en compare that with performances on international level - a total string of unbelievable BS. .
Well Nienaber never head coached at the WC. So the only way we can compare them is in their non WC records. And in that comparison Nienaber by himself did as well as Nienaber plus Erasmus. Fact.
Not when the one coached in two easy WC years and the other didn’t. You eliminate those games to even up the opposition. Nienaber’s record was as good as Eluckmiss.
Better really because we played the whole 21 RC in Australia. Nienaber’s win over NZ in that series was the high point of our non WC years.
You can’t go any further…..it’s obvious if you are comparing two coaches, you can’t have one playing a second game against New Zealand, while the other is playing Romania
Country of the blind...horse to water sh!+.
If you can’t see the logic I can’t help you….one has to assume a modicum of intelligence. If you can’t see that comparisons have to be based on equally difficult schedules this string is not for you.
...ah, and now I'm too stupid to follow your illogic...
Draad haven’t you learned, I respond in kind. Make a decent argument, I’ll respond decently. Be a friend and I’ll be your friend. Make a comment like your second to last one and expect the same kind of response.
Blind spots supported by facts, as in the case of this string, aren’t blind spots. Life is full of examples of mass delusion.
It's all about the weight of the variables in the different equations...so your way of filing the facts are not necessarily the only or even the correct way...it's all perspective...and for this thread...the facts have Rassie with 2 RWCs and Jake with one...
Draad when you have as many blind spots as ou Mozzietard you bound to be making as ass of yourself quite often.
Now poor mozzietard thinks the Rugby World that rates Rassie is wrong and he is right. That is simply delusional.
I think for Mozzie it's largely an emotional problem. He invested so much is smearing Rassie for so many years he just can't admit he got it all so horribly wrong.
Now it's become obsessional, a lot like TDS.
Maybe he needs to see a shrink?
More from Rugby
- RugbyScotland dominate the stats53 REPLIES · 212 VIEWS
- RugbySpringboks vs Scotland - Monday retrospective27 REPLIES · 162 VIEWS
- RugbyUnder 20 Springbok team to play the Under 20 England team i the RWC semi on Mondat14 REPLIES · 111 VIEWS
- RugbyMonday Morning Team12 REPLIES · 94 VIEWS
- NewsIreland Test Reveals All Blacks' World Cup Fixes0 REPLIES
- NewsIreland Test Reveals All Blacks' World Cup Fixes1 REPLIES