Dr Moz repair the faulty Mozcroscope lens first. The world class number 7, Du Toit, is in a class of his own. By the way Mostert was playing lock. His competition right now is Snyman not Du toit.
Twenty eight tackles by Du Toit takes some beating.
Both were very good.
Not exactly sure if it's intended for us to revolve the way we play on a high work rate in defence, but if we are then they are very suitable. Neither have the punch that Lood or Snyman are capable of on the charge. If we have Steph at 7 for his workrate I'd like to experiment with one of those partnering Etzebeth. Steph hasn't proven himself at 7 yet but if he continues in the same vein then our pack is looking to mirror previous physical Bok sides.
Steph hasn't proven himself at 7
Cheaser he may not have proven himself to you but he has in a big way for the vast majority of folk given his rati ngs against the wee abs. Must he also walk on water!!!!!
My concerns with Steph are that he is getting beaten by the fringe every game. It's become an obvious opportunity as far as our opponents are concerned. He defends like he is operating 2 seconds behind everyone else too often.
That said, there are positives to his game. He is one of the forwards we can trust ball-in-hand. They can station him out wide and he has lineout ability.
However, he has been one of those players shielded from critique. This is why the Guppies were too soft for Jake.
Mozart
Reading a morzoscope of yours is normally funny because it comprises of lies and misrepresentations - nobody can take that BS seriously. So keep it up and forget about even trying to write the prejudiced BS you are known for,
Dr Moz you are onto a hiding to nothing simply because Moster had a pretty good game at lock ( Although i think i would like Snyman to have a shot at partnering Eben) and because lock and flanker play are different.
Then there is qualitative elements. Du Toit's tackles are harder for example. Then comparing apples with apples - Du Toit can dominate at the back of lineouts but Mostert is a number 5 lock!
Take it from Beeno - Du Toit is a world class 7 as he proved against Nz with a man of the match game.
What the hell is a process tackle? It came out previously that process tackles are always made by your pet hates and decent tackles by your favourites,
When I read the first paragragh of the above post of yours I realized the rest is dreamed up BS invented by your less than fertile brain deficiency.
Duplication
Mozart BS exposed from the following comments in news 24:-
"Pieter-Steph du Toit, playing out of position in the No 7 jersey, produced another monumental performance and was my man-of-the-match.
But a moment that will live on in Springbok rugby folklore was seeing Du Toit in tears straight after the final whistle.
Du Toit’s work-rate was second to none on Saturday and he made close to 30 tackles, not to mention a few sturdy carries as well.
An example of Du Toit’s commitment and impeccable work rate can be seen in the video clip below where he runs 60m to make a try saving tackle in the first half. "
Clip shows what is going on here - pet hate, lies and misrepresentations to be taken into account when dealing with this idiot supreme.
The above writings of Mozart are full misrepresentation and lies, in other words total BS, and should not be taken seriously. The man suffer from dementia.
BS
BS
...How does the metres gained compare i wonder and players beaten..
Haha Beeno....Dr Moz repair the faulty Mozcroscope lens first.
One wonders what type of scope the Mozcroscope is...is it a telescope, microscope or even a rifle scope aimed at certain players...hahahaha
More likely a kaleidoscope.
Mozart
It is always a totally slanted thing that you wrote and that is why it is utter BS, Bad news that. Nobody said that Mostert had a poor game and you are the one who tried to find a means of attacking Du Toit, The whole scenario is typical a creation by you to attack Du Toit and that is what makes it stinks to high heaven.
You are childish and malevolent - a real person with hatred of huge magnitude of players who were potential replacement candidates for the rugby geriatrics admired by you. That shines through every post you ever made about any of your pet hate players. Childish BS on your part
Mozart
It is always a totally slanted thing that you wrote and that is why it is utter BS, Bad news that. Nobody said that Mostert had a poor game and you are the one who tried to find a means of attacking Du Toit, The whole scenario is typical a creation by you to attack Du Toit and that is what makes it stinks to high heaven.
You are childish and malevolent - a real person with hatred of huge magnitude of players who were potential replacement candidates for the rugby geriatrics admired by you. That shines through every post you ever made about any of your pet hate players. Childish BS on your part
Mozart
It is always a totally slanted thing that you wrote and that is why it is utter BS, Bad news that. Nobody said that Mostert had a poor game and you are the one who tried to find a means of attacking Du Toit, The whole scenario is typical a creation by you to attack Du Toit and that is what makes it stinks to high heaven.
You are childish and malevolent - a real person with hatred of huge magnitude of players who were potential replacement candidates for the rugby geriatrics admired by you. That shines through every post you ever made about any of your pet hate players. Childish BS on your part
I was also wondering why Marx running back 50m+ himself and making the crucial first low contact got no credit.
Everything you do not like is hype when it comes to your pet hates, Nobody over years has a record of hyping up your favorite players that was in fact not meeting requirements. The list is virtually endless - so who are you to talk about hype?
Because of what you write on this site and your personal attacks nobody find it difficult to find insulting remarks that accurately describe you for what you really are.
Moz and his side-kicks operating the Mozcroscope.
Looks a little one-eyed to me
All those other eyes are channeled to the one-eyed bloke on top. He's the one who does the "assessment" of "process tackles", etc. PSDT is better than your assessment shows Moz.
So PSDT made 18 metres and beat two defenders...whereas Mostert ran 20cm and beat nobody...probably why PSDT is rated higher especially if he made more carries and his metres gained stat is 900% better than Mosterts..
