De Allende was a non-factor. The Lood steal was great, but there was nothing else. Kolisi was scrappy and more involved. An average performance. Kwagga was much better than both Steph and Wiese. The Lions were the more dominant team in contact, and took themselves away from that strength by aimlessly kicking like the Boks. Mapimpi was the most consistently good Bok.
Boks showed real character...got together as a team and did the job well...a team that is well bonded in spirit, communication and really good talent.
Yes, Saffex, Handre was huge, imho he is the essential link to our success...the best flyhalf we have had for decades, come to think of it perhaps ever.
Yes, the fat lady is not finished singing but the Boks are finding themselves to where they should be, well done chaps and good stand Rassie and Co.
I wish the rest of Saffas had the spirit, courage and unity you amazing people have...something we used to have...you set a good example to us and yes I'm proud of you, everyone of you.
Dve
You are right about De Jager - he was a major part in strengthening the forwards and helped to gain line-out dominance missing in the first half.
Poor Kindergarten Imbecile again missed 75% of what happened in the game and the dominance of De Allende was absolutely good to see. strength in having to be tackled by two or three players - two critical breakdown possession turnovers by De Allende was never seen by the imbecile. Idiots on sit e will unfortunately always be a cross for us to bear.
The strength to need up to two Boks to drive him forward. You really are a noob Lügnerin. Loved those shuffle balls wide did you? Fantastic stuff. About the most we can excited of him. But then, you never did have high standards, considering your love of the 17th best flank in SH rugby.
As per Pollard being the best ever? Not even close. His record is inferior to that of Morné and Butch is still the most talented Bok 10 I have ever seen. I haven't decided where I place Pollard. He plays like a more physical Stransky at times.
Lood have us momentum where? One line-out steal, what else? You speak of ignorance and stupidity yet you are so wound up about something that you cannot explain.
Damian is a worse centre than Steph is a flank. Damian was not good, has never been good and will never be good. Damian is a piddly centre with no skills and a pea between the ears. But that's how you like them Unteromlett, big and stupid. Preferably fat too. How was Wiese for you? The next big thing we simply had to have.
Have you ever had a call that worked out? You're a laugh a minute Cheeto
Oh pipe down a wee bit Organhuffer. Give the drivel a beak for once. You simply have no clue whatsoever.
I see Lood getting well deserved praise for this performance by one and all minus ou Org!
Allende is getting high rating as well.
This test was a disaster for the Rassie bashers. Talk about the EGG landing.
Piss brain
In the first half the Springboks had a nightmare in line-outs on won throw - the frst throw-ins by the Springboks invovle 2 retained and 2 stolen by the Lions. The problem they had that throws to Mostert was a lottery and they were fporced to throw the ball to Ewho were at times isolated, aand under pressure.
When De Jager came on they had the opportunity to split the recipients between De Jager and Etzebeth and there were no more lottery ticket throw-ins needed. If you did not see that you must have indeed missed 75% of the game.
Ypour explanation on De Allende is even more silly. It normally take two or three players to tackle him without any support being provided by the springboks . Where is the space for springboks to drive him forward as suggested by you. Piss on th brain is all that you can produce on site. By he way what aboput that breakdown where De Allende pushed two Lions forwards off the ball at a breakdown resulting in a penalty for the Springboks which Pollard converted. Never saw that have you?
De Allende is extremely strong when it comes to Centers and that is a fact.
It usually takes one player to stop Damian. But he likes to crab into contact to drag the tackler a bit, we usually struggle to get the ball back quickly. When Damian needs to go forward he needs support. His one big crashball on the night saw him getting dumped backwards a good metre. See, having references makes all the difference. I know exactly what happened.
I call it tractoring. Notice how lost Dud Allende seemed after Biggar was subbed. His programming said…..catch ball….spot Biggar…..crash into Biggar……keep the legs moving…..reset ball.
Almost finished reviewing Limps time on the field. Rather flaccid showing by Dud Allende. I'll keep paddling upstream, you can keep paddling in circles through Schitt's Creek with your bear hands Cheeto Dust . Ende.
"I'll keep paddling upstream..."
Indeed.
Draad,
Tiresome negatism...is the glass half full or half empty ?
It's a hopeless and fruitless task to reason with naysayers.
Constructive critism is something entirely different...
That's the way they are wired.
If rugby results makes them so miserable cannot understand why they watch
We will never get anything bar twisted illogic from Mozart and the KIndergarten Imbecile since -
* Mozart's findings are based on prejudice and personal suppositions and not whata ctually show what really happen in games; and
* the Kindergarten imbecile is totally ignorant about rugby and he misses out o 75% of games normally - yesterday it veered to 90%. .
Puleeze Dud Allende is a blunt instrument.
But doesn’t take the inside or outside gap, can’t tactical kick, can’t offload, can’t time his passes….can’t tackle low in space….can’t see the game.
Henshaw has comfortably outplayed him.
But he can tractor
