My desperate efforts to educate the Village Idiots on site are rarely successful

Just a question - what is a bye against a stronger opponent?   Factually a bye is when the team is NOT playing any team  - so is the bye against some mythical  team dreamed up by …. ???  

School children with poor comprehension skills. Le sigh. 

"Wants to see how he does before their bye   against strong opposition." 

What? His performance. 

When? Before their bye. 

Who? Stronger opposition (Bulls).

I feel like I'm teaching declensions here.

Rumplerooiskin attempting to salvage Lügnerin's thread. 

Silly Billy

Thanks for inserting the word "before"  in the sentence - now it is clear at last,  Shows what you should think before you write your normal tripe on site.  Listen to my advice  carefully before you become sillier.

So lets analyze the above statement carefully.   In round 4  the Sharks are playing the Bulls - then they have a bye in Round 5 and voila which team are they playing in Round 5?   The Chiefs of course - the team beaten by the Brumbies by a massive margin and in the next round at home was beaten by the Sunwolves - the bottom of the overall log team,

Ag please Silly Billy I am wasting a massive amount of time in trying to teach you rugby related issues - am getting desperate thinking that I am throwing valuable pearls of wisdom before a  swine. 

But I am a very generous person and will keep on trying,            

Silly Billy

So neither Rooinek and me did not see the word - weird!!!  And what about the stronger team myth?   Teach me I should read your tripe more carefully - but it is so shallow and rugby i gnorant at all times  that it bores me.  

All in all please think before you write tripe.   If Esterhuizen did not bugger up in Round 3 and was so excellent as you said he was would Du Preez not have kept him in the team for one more round before the bye week and give him a break against the Chiefs - suddenly promoted to be a strong team by you?     \\

So neither Rooinek and me did not see the word - weird!!!

Uhm, Rooinek actually quoted the word in his response, so obviously it was there. Although the way you put it with the double negative technically means that you both saw it (not sure how you know what Rooinek saw or didn't see, though - probably the same way you know what Du Preez is thinking).

In round 4  the Sharks are playing the Bulls - then they have a bye in Round 5 and voila which team are they playing in Round 5?   The Chiefs of course - the team beaten by the Brumbies by a massive margin and in the next round at home was beaten by the Sunwolves - the bottom of the overall log team,

Yes, you see, that is why he said a strong team before the bye. Which clearly refers to the Bulls, not to whoever comes after the bye. This isn't that complicated.

Let's insert commas to make it clear:

wants to see how he does, before their bye, against a strong opponent

or as it could have been a little more clearly put:

wants to see how he does against a strong opponent before their bye

It's a must win for the Sharks ... they aren't resting their best players as Doos would have you lot believe ... they are in fact playing what they think to be their best side against the form South African team.

A win away from home against the Bulls would boost their confidence ... get them back on track ... it's just what they need after such a poor display against the faggots from Cape Town.

You don't reward poor performances with an additional game. That's not the message you'd want to get across.

Doos doesn't know his arse from his elbow and so his best way to cover his idiocy is to make the usual excuses for the bungling Estie.

"He's been rested" ... "it's rotational" ... it's week 4 for heavens sake ... you cannot tell me the poor dear's tired after only 3 weeks into the comp ... but then again watching him play last week, maybe he is in need of a break.

Truth is that Estie was very poor last week and deserves nothing less than to be benched ... in fact, he's lucky to be on the bench at all.

Such a useless signing.

"Can't wait to see how they go with their bye against tough opposition. Wouldn't miss that for the world. Is it being televised?? "

LMAO!

When Omlett and Omellete get together to defend each other's hilarious blunders they form this forum' s funniest double team.

Clutching at anything to stop themselves from drowning, even each other.

So all those saying that it's not rotational and that Esterhuizen was shit are also saying that Ruan Botha was shit as well and Bosch is not better than Rhyno Smith at 15.

Smh.

This place is like an episode of Eastenders. 

Silly Billy

No ruin sucker run  LOL

Xavi

Bosch made not one but two serious balls-up in the Stormers game and Botha was better - but he  was fangless in attack and in defense and gave away a crucial penalty  as well.  Not the hottest game I saw him playing

This place is like an episode of Eastenders.

Hey, now, look. That's just uncalled for.

The thread title is self-explanatory...

"My desperate efforts to educate the Village Idiots on site are rarely successful "

In order to successfully educate someone, the first requirement would generally be that you have greater knowledge... The fact that you are RARELY successful speaks for itself...

The Trooth Fairy is back - funny that he selected a fly on a blanks space  as avatar,   One can only assume the fly represents life - the blank space the brain of the Fairy.   

Who can fathom how big life is? Therefore I conclude that you must think very highly of Herr Truth.

Silly Billy

Are you and the other brain-deficient never learn when you are shown up as dead-heads and run away fro m this thread?

Yes ... and you are the main character in the show, Doos ...

He should rather have had the fly sitting on a turd ...

Hahahahahahahahaha what a hilarious thread which has not panned out quite as ou maaaaikie hoped.

Thread itself of course proves my povnt that the whole rugby topic vs really just an excuse to have a go which is the real source of entertainment for the oaks! Hahahahahahahahahahahaha Otherwise how do you explain the mountain being made of this molehill?.  

Peeper is at his best when trying to assume the moral high ground - sidesplitting stuff from the totally corrupt and depraved Peeper.

The former chief Village idiot in ou maaaaikies books, rooitwit, is now not a village idiot. My how things change. Who can tell which way t he winds will blow next.

Great thread oaks keep up the hilarious work. 

... haaaaahahahahahaaa ... yes a turd is actually better ... think I'll call him that from now on ...

"A word to the wise is enough"

I'm sure there will come a day when Mikey will sit back and reflect on this thread and say: "Why did I do this to myself?".

Maybe, or maybe not. Either way, it was amusing. 

@Mozart: You're not wrong about the gotcha jockey. He has been baited more than a few times. Very impulsive, das Omlett lernt nicht. 

Silly Billy

Why should I regret starting this thread?  I m not the one being embarrassed - you are.  If do not recognize that your IQ must be way below idiocy level.  If I were you - I would avoid this thread like a plague.    

I know you are not embarrassed. It has been well established that you feel no shame. 

No you are too stupid to realize that you should be embarrassed when exposed as a total fool when it comes to rugby .