RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Dec 2014, 13:53#2
Careful LeTwat, people might start getting the impression that you don't like P at Lambie very much!
DEDezertFox
Pro2,288 posts
22 Dec 2014, 14:02#3
Nothing rugby related? Such a shame that the trolls at SS banned you; fancy that, even they couldn't tolerate you. So you loaf around here with all the vigor of a stale fart bleating endlessly from that gaping crevice in the crudely etched, weather-beaten, slab you call a face. Don't worry Rooibek, I know you are just a worn down middle-aged never-was who has been beaten down by life, riddled with bitterness and anger; but in the end you just want to feel validated and special.
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Dec 2014, 14:04#4
Wow! Tell me, LeTwat, who do you dislike more, me or Pat Lambie?
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Dec 2014, 15:53#6
Letsallbemorons
Here is the stats on Lambie:-
Lambie0/0164/4/20000110/10/000/0
The fact that this moron mentioned Lambie's involvement in the game 50 times in a game lasting 80 minutes is absolute bullshit of the first order. Any player in any game is not that active and what he sees as invovlement is tommyrot.
According to the stats in the whole game Lambie handled the ball ten times - he kicked four times - passed the ball 4 times and carried the ball twice. Lambie lost the ball possession once - by failing to find touch in the filed of play with a penalty - it went out behind the corner flag - he made 10 tackles and missed one.
Now cut out the garbage and then tell us what really was the situation.
Most of the abovei s real BS and a biased and unconfoirmed lot of garbage. Have you nothing better to do than to come up with that tripe?
OVOvalBalls
Rookie95 posts
22 Dec 2014, 16:06#7
@vampirefantasyobsessed
You watched the game and recorded everything Lambie did ? Impressively obsessed !
N o flyhalf on tour smothered themselves in glory. If we ran the same exercise for Handre Pollard's outing against Ireland I think you will find it even more atrocious.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Dec 2014, 16:38#8
So OOM, stop blustering and contradict the specifics.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Dec 2014, 16:59#9
Mozart
No need to - for a player to be active in 50 cases in a game is a total impossibility. Normally about 40 minutes is taken up by scrums, line-outs, mauls. penalties, converting of tries etc.
That means Lambie was involved in the game onee every 40 seconds of actually play. That is a physical impossibility - so if that is not BS of the first order what is? I am not going to waste any time going through that lot of tripe.
Now be clever - for a change - and try and figure that one out so as not to support your fellow-moron.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Dec 2014, 17:20#11
Bloody impossible. The player handled the ball in total ten times and according to your fellow-moron Lambie wa constantly involved in everything. Think moron - what your fellow- moron wrote is a physical impossibility. Get it into your head - game,set and match.
Just do yourself a favour and compare the stats with what Letsallbemoron wrote and you will find out that what he wrote does not add up to the stats and he is making a fool of himslef.
By the way he must have learnt this type of rubbish from you with your morzoscope _ which alays turned out to be BS as well.
22 Dec 2014, 18:08#13
If I was to question Lestat's account of Lambie's involvement, I would have gone back to the recording and refuted each of his 50 odd remarks. Easy really.
OVOvalBalls
Rookie95 posts
22 Dec 2014, 18:16#14
@mosquitofart
To be entirely fair, it hardly seems that Nosferatu's play by play account is objective by any measure.
Considering the colorful language used (smashed, swatted, dragged, swarmed) for each negative incident and the bland, 'legal'esque' type description used for each positive contribution it would require a dimwit of impressive magnitude not to view Nosferatu's assessment of Lambie as subjective at best which reduces its legitimacy somewhat.
You surely dont buy that classic marketing technique do you ?
Even dumbassmike noted it. Rooihol did too and so do I.
Nosferatu - do a play by play of the Ireland game. Lets see how that one reads.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Dec 2014, 18:50#15
Zeromoron
I could not fuind a fullv ersion of the game on U-Tube and consequently could pt deal wiith Letsallbemorons' grabled rubbish point by point. However, if Lambie did all what Letsallbemorons said he did - he mus be a superhuman.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Dec 2014, 18:51#16
I'm not arguing every incident happened exactly as described. But Maaaik is saying he wasn't involved in these interactions at all. By the way....Lestat has a long history of being accurate in these Reviews....Maaik and RooiAAS have a long history of lying.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
22 Dec 2014, 19:20#17
What a load of prejudicial rubbish.......let me guess the majority of us and Mallett got it wrong regarding his performance against England huh?
Mallett was pissed when he said that Lambie should be proud of his performance?
OVOvalBalls
Rookie95 posts
22 Dec 2014, 19:30#18
@mosquitofart
A slightly one-sided review, well embellished with the appropriate words which reveals Nosferatu's shamelessly biased and subjective opinion. His agenda is transparent unfortunately which really nullifies any true value.
Nosferatu - lets see your play by play on the Ireland game.
OVOvalBalls
Rookie95 posts
22 Dec 2014, 19:32#19
@dumbassquacker
What is this ? 'could pt deal wiith Letsallbemorons' grabled rubbish point by point' ?
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Dec 2014, 19:48#20
Mozart has a long history of writing Morzoscopes that is rarely anytyhing - but the truth - annd Letsallbemorons have learned from him. Accuracy cannot be dealt with by them - because the truth is destroyeed by prejudice.
Mozart - point out where I said "he wasn't involved in these interactions at all. " You are a liar unless ypou can prove I said what you wrote here. I refer to the stats indicating most of the issues he was involved in - so now get your flipping lies admitted for a change.
OVOvalBalls
Rookie95 posts
22 Dec 2014, 19:52#21
There is a lot of 'pointing out where I said this and that' on this forum. Are you lads sure you are all grown adults ?
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Dec 2014, 19:56#22
Nope you said he couldn't have been involved in 50 interactions.....it wasn't a question of whether he did well, or whether Lestat was accurate in his descriptions....your bald assertion was it was impossible for Lambie to be involved so many times. Here is the relevant passage:
"The fact that this moron mentioned Lambie's involvement in the game 50 times in a game lasting 80 minutes is absolute bull[removed] of the first order. Any player in any game is not that active and what he sees as invovlement is tommyrot."
So I ask you again, which of these incidents was Lambie not involved in? No ducking, diving or changing the subject.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Dec 2014, 20:20#23
Mozart
You are playing the snake game again - Where did I say ""he wasn't involved in these interactions at all. " ? A straight question and the resut is a devious response. How did the response by me started ? I quoted the stats and then indicates when Lambie was involved and what he did. You alleged I said"""he wasn't involved in these interactions at all. " ?
If I can find where I can watch the game agaibn on video - I will point out where the individual allegations are BS,
DBDbDraad
Captain26,388 posts
DBDbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
22 Dec 2014, 21:11#24
Cool, Balz, I'm no Bambie fanboy, but to only emphasise his mistakes and forget his good plays are a bit daft in anyone's book.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Dec 2014, 21:34#25
Okay, how's this for something totally objective, the YE scores while Lambie was on the park:
Ireland 13 ....Boks 5
England. 28..... Boks 31
Italy 6..... Boks 8
Wales. 12..... Boks 6
Total. Opponents 59.....Boks. 50
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Dec 2014, 22:27#26
Mozart
Spo Lambie was the only player on the field that caused the bad performances of the Springboks? You must be seriously deficient in thinking ability to come up with that load of rubbish.
No answer yest to a straight question? But what can one expect from you?
DBDbDraad
Captain26,388 posts
DBDbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
22 Dec 2014, 22:48#28
Moz, we still lost the game against Ire with Pollard being the main 10 AND we beat the Poms with Bambie. Against Wales the overseas players were not involved, so it can't be taken as a yard stick. I'm all for Pollard, but due to the game plan we lost to Ireland. Bambie played the rest of the tests and we were also poor, but at least we beat the Poms. Like Mike says, there were some other players in the team as well.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
23 Dec 2014, 06:56#30
Balls and utter balkls - where is the answer to my question?
Interesting theory though. Lmbie is replaced and the team performs better. The Bulls replaced Fouche and Matfield is the reason for their improvement - not the flyhalf.
This kind of prejudiced BS is what we get from some of our members.
DEDezertFox
Pro2,288 posts
23 Dec 2014, 15:42#31
There is no prejudice whatsoever. Do you know what is though? Bare faced lies! When someone hates a player to the extent they fabricate an entire decade of nonsense to justify that hatred... well, that is prejudice right there. What I have done is as I always do, present the cold hard facts. I will have a video up in the next few days to go along with my summary. You can get to work in the mean time making some excuses as to why video evidence is not evidence at all; you'll have to avoid the "stats are where it is" as I had you beaten in that department too. No way out but the deep dive as Mozart puts it, that followed by the subsequent threads stuffed to the brim with vitriol.
@Draad: Draad, it's not a case of not pointing out anything good in Lambie's game. In fact, I've already stated the pros to the cons to him as a player and where he could fit in. But the question at 10 is this, does he bring enough to the table? Are there more good things than bad? The summary makes it clear, no, there are not enough positives. I don't blame him entirely for the Boks poor showing, there are certainly other issues too, but his a quite a heavy burden to carry.
OVOvalBalls
Rookie95 posts
23 Dec 2014, 15:59#32
@Nosferatu
If you honestly believe you are entirely objective, please conduct the same play by play description for Handre Pollard in the Ireland game. Please also use descriptions such as smashed, dragged etc.
Looking forward to that one. More than likely will contain extensive justification language . Lets compare the two descriptions to each other.
DEDezertFox
Pro2,288 posts
23 Dec 2014, 16:06#33
If you want to prove the point then do the video yourself. I'm not splicing footage at the behest of lazy oafs, if you think you are onto something then the onus is on you to spend the time to put it all together. As per semantics, the video I post will match seamlessly with my summary.
OVOvalBalls
Rookie95 posts
23 Dec 2014, 17:11#34
@Nosferatu
Relax. It is all about opinions. You make a lot of statements which cannot be substantiated and that is ok. Stop killing yourself over this.
I am not trying to intimate anything nor am I of any intention to fall face forward into any kind of egg. I am sure your carefully and colorfully crafted one-sided account will garner support from many, however to me without a comparison it is superfluous.
I suspected but was not certain until your last contribution that it seems you are provincially motivated for sure. I definitely dont have the obsession with Pollard that you apparently have with Lambie. In my opinion, if we were to use only the end of year tour as indication, then neither are Springbok quality flyhalf options.
I only wish Goosen had got more game time. It is apparent that Heyneke Meyer himself is still trying to fit the correct Nr 10 into his game. At this point in time I dont think we have anything solid and this was painfully obvious on the Northern Hemisphere fields where we will compete for the world cup next year.
The Ireland game was atrocious and unfortunately Handre Pollard was complicit.
If you admitted that Handre Pollard had a below par performance against Ireland I am sure it will lend more credibility to the objectivity you are so vehemently eager to claim.
23 Dec 2014, 18:47#35
Is Lambie still a coward?
DEDezertFox
Pro2,288 posts
24 Dec 2014, 14:39#36
"I suspected but was not certain until your last contribution that it
seems you are provincially motivated for sure. I definitely dont have
the obsession with Pollard that you apparently have with Lambie. In my
opinion, if we were to use only the end of year tour as indication, then
neither are Springbok quality flyhalf options."
Provincially motivated? I am the least tribal minded person you will ever meet. Not one team has escaped my wrath at some point. Last season it was the Bulls I hounded the most, the Sharks the least. When I backed the Bulls then I was a Bulls fan, when I backed the Sharks as our best then for several years on SARugby.net I was a Sharks fan., when WP... you get the idea. The problem is this, you are a relativist. You try to twist an interpretation until it fits your preconceived notions. I point out Lambie's failings then you try to find a way of interpreting it so that you can still man-love Lambie. So you resort to the, "You are from tribe x and Lambie's tribe y". Unfortunately for you, the facts I have presented are still facts and you have dealt not with the issue at hand merely skirted around it so you may find a pocket of ignorance to coddle into. Well, the video is down below, not that it matters because you will still defend your preconceived notions founded on emotion, not logic, sound reasoning or fact.
Oh, and as an aside? Pollard's performance, nyet, the Bok performance as a whole, against Ireland was the best on tour. Pollard was still very good.
DBDbDraad
Captain26,388 posts
DBDbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
24 Dec 2014, 16:51#38
Pollard's performance against Ire had more to do with a poor game plan than the inability of the player. Against England, Bambie made allot of errors, but still steered the game out of the Pom's reach. Much of the same to me. Wales was a game that should not have been played at all, but Mammon had his say.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
24 Dec 2014, 17:39#39
Well there we have it. Totally accurate reporting by Lestat.....and every incident is noted. So will the liar Mike kindly point out to us where Lestat was wrong.....or will he slime away to dive into a pile oh his own malodorous waste?
GEgeneraltit
Pro3,164 posts
24 Dec 2014, 17:40#40
Pl is still my favourite...the pressures on and he has not been handled right...in NZ he would have been a star...simply because NZ coaches recognise exceptional talent, he would have done well in any country that has no pre-conceived format, even Scotland...I was told he nearly went there...being of proud Scot's background...PL is a strong man with integrity and loyal to the "t".
Pat do your best young man...you have many backers here and fans here and worldwide.
You have got a huge challenge from a very unforgiving public...you have not played your best...your coach must use you correctly but I know you are stronger th an that...rise above them Pat...you're a great.