The disinformation was started by Mozart and Pakie who changed the said info to twelve tackles made and 8 missed and since then that story has been emphasized by Mozart and co endlessly.
Three lies (even four maybe) in one sentence? That's impressive even for you.
They distorted situation to an alarming extent where they lied about what happened.
Name the lies.
Moz are you saying Malherbe is getting an overlap every time he packs down at scrum time ?
If so hes doing better than the sea-gulling wingers eh ?
JJ ripped the crap outta Smith ?
Oh I see he was picking up any little "gifts " that wee snake left in his wake
Based on that statement Mr Saffex I would posit that the only centers you are conversant with are covered in chocolate and come in fancy boxes.
LOL Wardaddy...those tasty chocolate centers that we raided when kids from mum....
I don't know if we have centres to burn but indeed Mr Saffex there are other things that need burning....just friendly suggestions....bwahahahahahahaha
There is a Billy Joel song that says " you PAY for your satisfaction somewhere along the line"
Pakie
First example in the Wallaby test in 2015 where your description was totally false as to tackles made and missed. Your assessment was De Allende made 12 Tackles and missed 8. When I pointed out that the description made by you are erroneous - you said that the numers were updated by adding two tackle4s made and one less tackle missed.
Based om your original "description" of what happened on the field pf play - AO now came up with De Allende costing the Springboks 3 tries. When asked in which test it happened he ran for cover, since your descriptions of what happened was false.
Your descriptions of what happened during games must be factual - not guided by prejudice against certain players, It is constantly proved to be falsified and Mozart's and your examples are now also followed by AO. Kee3p to facts and you will not end up being a fraud.. .
Let me help you:
The disinformation was started by Mozart and Pakie
I posted numbers, not Mozart.
who changed the said info
Nobody changed any info. I posted numbers and I never claimed that my tackle count overruled the official figures. In fact, I qualified when posting that I may have missed some tackles, because the tackle count wasn't the object of the exercise, and actually completely beside the point. You latched on to that small discrepancy as a diversion because I once again exposed you as a liar.
to twelve tackles made and 8 missed
I never claimed 8 missed tackles. I claimed 7, which I still stick to because I can document every one. Why don't you accuse ESPN of lying when they change their counts after subsequent viewings?
and since then that story has been emphasized by Mozart and co endlessly.
No, the only person who keeps dragging up that story is you. Whenever I discuss that test (like just the other day) I use the official stats, since that cuts out all this pointless bitching about numbers.
Shall I link to that thread from 3 years ago so everyone can see what deceit you were trying to sell regarding De Allende's missed tackles? How he missed them because he "had to get up from making other tackles"?
Listen Pakie
You claimed that you study the game and made fixed statements about it. The tackle count si important and to claim it is not is BS.- fact is you distorted te actual figures by a big margin. Now suddenly you say was provisional and how can you make a provisional statement when the actual objective was only one - namely to get at De Allende.
If you were not checked and found wanting you would swear it is correct.
Further distortions of occurrences in similar match reports showed exactly the same trends and had the same BS conclusions as to what actually happened. You then started a similar new method. Publish photos about incidents - but again there was a flaw - since the angles of the photos made any conclusion possible - false as it may be.
I have no problems with your contributions - but I am against falsification of issues when you try and discredit players without real merit .. I gave best advice and that is to be careful with what you write - your history has been severely questionable -0 but compared to Mozart and lately AO - you are an angel of rectitude.
It would be best for Clever Mike not to revisit the 2015 encounter, that is a nightmare for any Damian fangirl.
If we bring to light the tackles, that would be very good. Do note Clever Mike, Pakie's assessment of that game is correct. Bringing a closer scrutiny upon each tackle is only going to leave you with another bloodied nose.
