Plum....

In case you've missed my below response here it is again...  I've had a look at Peter Levenda's summary of events leading into the assassination of JFK.....I didn't go into the follow ups by the other speakers. He's condensed  material took place over a long period of time and in his own words there's a mountain of related material still classified. On that basis I find his summary inconclusive.

Sorry Denny, i did miss it. My bad.

Glad you checked it out . Yes, as inconclusive as can be. But pretty interesting though, right? I'd be hard pushed to take everything, or even half as truth, but it's just amazing to me how one can listen to a 60 minute talk and suddenly realise that the rabbit hole might be much deeper and sinister.

Again, thanks for checking it out and if you do follow up at all and find anything interesting then please do let me know.

 I think it's fair to say that Peter Levenda's theory is just one of several which adds to the dilemma of the actual truth. Personally I believe that Lee Harvey Oswald did play a role, I also believe that Jack Ruby was heavily connected to the mafia and we know from historical records that his calls to mafia bosses and connections skyrocketed leading up to the assassination. We also know that mafia and gangster prosecutions also skyrocketed when Robert Kennedy served as Attorney General....one mafia boss was picked up by the FBI and dumped in the sticks on a deserted road. Again, lots of dots but no connections, anyway it makes for interesting debate.