FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Protea starting eleven...in the light of another young pop gun flop

Protea starting eleven...in the light of another young pop gun flop

Started by Mozart37 REPLIES588 VIEWS· 11 Jan 2015, 22:22
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
11 Jan 2015, 22:22
#1
11 Jan 2015, 22:22#1

Incredible. In spite of Faf's huge innings we lose. We have to get winners in the team for the CWC....mentally strong players.


Let's start with the bowlers....it has to be a core of Steyn, Morkel, Philander and Tahir. Tahir demonstrated again today he can survive a maximum onslaught....Harmer is too inexperienced although promising. The one option would be Marchant for Morkel. But why? I'm convinced Morkel is just as fast and releases the ball from a higher point getting more bounce. De Lange is credible though....Abbot isn't, Rabada isnt.


Let's leave it there and look at the batting. I would start with Amla and Roussow who is technically better than de Kock Faf at 3, AB at 4 are easy picks. So we now have left our number five , six and seven....one of whom should also bowl a few.


At five and six, we could have Duminy, Miller, van Zyl or de Kock. We will probably choose Duminy, Miller and De Kock to keep wicket. But I have more faith in van Zyl than De Kock or Miller if the bowling is sharp. 



For a CWC final it would have to be Amla, Rossouw, du Plessis, AB, Duminy, van Zyl, Robin Peterson, Philander, Steyn, Morkel, Tahir. 


Some of these chaps aren't in the squad....So this is impossible as things stand. But why would Abbott want to humiliate himself more than today....why should the selectors let him?


The hardest choice is Peterson at 7, and he may still be hurt. But we can't rely on Duminy bowling 10 overs if we want a chance to win this one....and Parnell is hopeless.

AG
AgPleezDeddyClub Pro900 posts
11 Jan 2015, 23:44
#2
11 Jan 2015, 23:44#2
 I wouldn't fret Moz, we named a seriously weakened team. Steyn and co wouldn't have allowed them to chase that down .
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
12 Jan 2015, 01:57
#3
12 Jan 2015, 01:57#3
No doubt Deddy, but we have some weaknesses. The lack of an all rounder seamer in the  Kallis idiom being the most obvious. Then there is the lack of an explosive opener. We have strengths in the middle order and the fast bowling. Spinning is a neutral at best.  
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 Jan 2015, 03:14
#4
12 Jan 2015, 03:14#4
 The lack of brains in the above selection is seriously problematic.   First of all the idea that De Kock is a flop can only occur in the minds of the non-thinking and clueless.   Can a person be a flop if he has the followingstats in ODI Cricket:-
ODIs35351148213543.58167688.426416118572So lets look at this "popgun failure".   He played in 35 games - in all games as an opener.   He made 1 482 runs - for an average of 43,58 runs per game.    He made 6 100's and 4 fifties - all of those in the last 24 games he played in.   In the process he hit 18 sixes and 161 fours with a strike rate of 88,42.   Call that a failure?   Lets look at the strike rate and average of Graeme Smtih - his predecessor - as an example.   In 194 innings played -  Smith averaged a strike rate of 80,81 with 10 100's and 44 50's.  He hit 24 6's and 1165 4's - for a batting average of 37,98.
All Smith's stats are way below that of De Kock - but De Kock is a pop-gun failure and Smith was a roaring success.     But Mozart regards him as a flop and that is what the headline and his starting line up as suggested entails - but what is to be expected from this clueless age crusader - who when De Kock was caught once off a ball bowled by Johnson - called De Kock Johnson's Bunny..      
To open with Rossouw is a no-no.  Rossouw is essential - but his best position is four. So because Mozart dislikes De Kock - Rossouw must be played outside of his best position.     Only an absolute idiot would suggest that.   
The answer is plain and simple that the squad selection was seriously flawed and that the following should never have been in the squad in the first instance:-
*   Farhaan Behardien*   Parnell*   Abbott.
In their places should have been Van Zyl, Pienaar and De Lange.
The starting line-up should be the following:-
1   Amla2   De Kock3   Du Plessis4   Rossouw5   De Villiers6   Miller7   Duminy8   Philander9   Steyn10  Morkel11  Fahir
The fifth bowling spot could be shared by Duminy, De Villiers and Du Plessis - if need be, but Duminy is good enough for 10 overs in any event.         
AG
AgPleezDeddyClub Pro900 posts
12 Jan 2015, 03:57
#5
12 Jan 2015, 03:57#5
 I do agree with some points Mike makes, De Kock may not be reliable in tests yet but he's definitely reliable in limited over cricket as his stats show. I think he can also be quite destructive after he gets his eye in.You're right about the gap that Kallis has left but having him was a true luxury, a world class bat and good seamer - there's no one good enough to replace him atm.I think Mike's team is pretty close to full strength, I can't think of any players who deserve to be there instead. Ryan Mclaren perhaps but that's just splitting hairs.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 Jan 2015, 04:25
#6
12 Jan 2015, 04:25#6
 APD
Instead of McLaren - I would rather have either Van Zyl or Obus Pienaar.   Both can be classified as all-rounders - with reasonable batting and bowling averages. 
AG
AgPleezDeddyClub Pro900 posts
12 Jan 2015, 04:47
#7
12 Jan 2015, 04:47#7
 Not seen much of Obus but I've read some good things.
AG
AgPleezDeddyClub Pro900 posts
12 Jan 2015, 04:49
#8
12 Jan 2015, 04:49#8
 I can't believe Pollard and Dwayne Bravo weren't in the Windies WC Squad, madness!
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
12 Jan 2015, 05:41
#9
12 Jan 2015, 05:41#9
We can't plan Duminy for 10 overs....he should be one of at least two extra bowlers. Van Zyl vs Miller gives us that option, and Peterson gives us a serious fifth bowler.
I would prefer Rossouw to start. He is technically stronger than de Kock, who saved a rather poor series against Oz with a hundred in the fifth dead rubber ODI. Most of the time he struggled against the Aussie pace attack....failed three times out of five. He does provide the wicket keeping option though, so there is a case to be made.
 Still we can select only two of Rossouw, de Kock, van Zyl and Miller if we want a proper bowling attack. Of those four I prefer van Zyl and Rossouw.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 Jan 2015, 07:14
#10
12 Jan 2015, 07:14#10
 This man is a complete idiot - information is of no value to him.   He is a complete idiot when it comes to player evaluation - either in rugby or cricket.    Stats means nothing to him - that is when it does not fit his argument.
But then what is to be expected from a complete fool who prefers Morne Steyn or Francois Steyn as Springbok flyhalf and support players like Matfield.    
If there is a player with a complete technique flop, nobody could be worse than Graeme Smith - yet Mozart was a total supporter of him .   And now suddenly he prefers Van Zyl - who has never played in ODI's ahead of De Kock.   Only a pathetic idiot could suggest that.          
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
12 Jan 2015, 11:25
#11
12 Jan 2015, 11:25#11

My WC starting side would be:

 

1. Amla 2. de Kock 3. Faf 4. AB 5. JP 6. Rossouw 7. Miller 8. Harmer 9. Philander 10. Steyn 11. Morkel

 

With the following making up the squad.....v/Zyl, de Lange, Tahir, Parnell

DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
12 Jan 2015, 12:00
#12
12 Jan 2015, 12:00#12
clevermike

Status:Hall Of Fame
Posts: 14687 RE: Protea starting eleven...in the light of another young pop gun flop
January 12, 2015, 07:14:30If there is a player with a complete technique flop, nobody could be worse than Graeme Smith - yet Mozart was a total supporter of him.         


 

Seriously Mike

 

Do you honestly say that Graeme Smith was worthless to SA or not worth his place in the side?

 

I hope this is just another one  of your baseless attacks on mozart, because again, this claim lacks all credibility

 

.

DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
12 Jan 2015, 12:01
#13
12 Jan 2015, 12:01#13
Saffex

Status:Hall Of Fame
Posts: 10877 RE: Protea starting eleven...in the light of another young pop gun flop
January 12, 2015, 11:25:15

My WC starting side would be:

1. Amla 2. de Kock 3. Faf 4. AB 5. JP 6. Rossouw 7. Miller 8. Harmer 9. Philander 10. Steyn 11. Morkel

With the following making up the squad.....v/Zyl, de Lange, Tahir, Parnell


 

Not a bad side at all Dave, in fact, the more I look at it, the more I really like it

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
12 Jan 2015, 12:06
#14
12 Jan 2015, 12:06#14
 Dave, I like your starting 11 and the order you've listed them...perfect. I won't have Parnell though, he is useless.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 Jan 2015, 12:14
#15
12 Jan 2015, 12:14#15
 DA
I never said that Graeme Smith was worthless to SA or not worth his place in the side.   I merely pointed out that Mozart was carrying on about QWuinton de Kock being a flop - and never said the same about Smith.   That while de Kock stats even this early in his career is much better than Smith's career averages were.
I do not like it when Mozart goes for players without any supporting evidence - and used the Smith data purely to show that he is wrong - as is normally the case with all players he denigrates.





DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
12 Jan 2015, 12:15
#16
12 Jan 2015, 12:15#16

Agreed Denny

 

Parnell is a liability, as I have said before  

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 Jan 2015, 12:20
#17
12 Jan 2015, 12:20#17
 Dave 
I like Harmer - but he is unfortunately not in the WC squad.   He should have been.   However Mozart apparently prefer Peterson - if you read his rubbish above.    
I dffer from you about Parnell though - would much rather have Obus Pienaar as an all-rounder.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
12 Jan 2015, 12:22
#18
12 Jan 2015, 12:22#18

Parnell has his moments, I prefer him to Abbott as he can also bat and provides variety being a left armer.

 

Would not make my starting side, would be a squad member.

 

The side is easy to pick really......forget useless pretenders like Robin Petersen, Berhardien, Phasingo etc.......Petersen is no better a spinner than JP, who in my opinion is pretty handy with the ball. He is more than a part time spinner.....he can do the job  

DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
12 Jan 2015, 12:23
#19
12 Jan 2015, 12:23#19
clevermike

Status:Hall Of Fame
Posts: 14688 RE: Protea starting eleven...in the light of another young pop gun flop
January 12, 2015, 12:14:57That while de Kock stats even this early in his career is much better than Smith's career averages were.



 

Mike

 

You cannot even begin to compare the two stats wise or average wise, when De Kock has only played 35 ODI's compared to Smith's 197.

 

Just as an example, Smith has, as of now, since he retired, scored 4 more test hundreds and 43 more 50's than De Kock.

 

You cannot justify any comparisons at this stage

 

 

 

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
12 Jan 2015, 12:30
#20
12 Jan 2015, 12:30#20
And anyone who dares to mention the incompetent McLaren will be regarded as ignorant.  
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
12 Jan 2015, 12:31
#21
12 Jan 2015, 12:31#21
Parnell has his moments??? is that so? ....name me one. 
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
12 Jan 2015, 12:47
#22
12 Jan 2015, 12:47#22

The only good thing to come out of the game is that Faf and Miller have maintained their consistency with the bat.


Miller like AB could be a match winner......it's a mental thing with Miller and I really do hope the kid finds what it takes to become a legend during the WC. 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
12 Jan 2015, 12:51
#23
12 Jan 2015, 12:51#23

Miller has come good in the last 12 months, he now knows he belongs at the highest level

 

I want to see him feature in the test squad as well.

 

Our best young bats are de Kock, Elgar, v/Zyl, Rossouw and Miller......all of them should be involved  

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
12 Jan 2015, 13:01
#24
12 Jan 2015, 13:01#24

Add RR Hendricks to that group.


Fancy sticking Justin Ontong in the side......how clueless was that!?  

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
12 Jan 2015, 13:51
#25
12 Jan 2015, 13:51#25
Yep Ontong at 35 who has always failed - what a pathetic selection, along with v/Wyk  
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 Jan 2015, 15:02
#26
12 Jan 2015, 15:02#26
 DA
I am not daring to compare the two players.   What I was on about is that  Mozart went bonkers - like he normally does.
However strictly speaking Smith batted in 194 matches.    He scored 24 6's and 1165 4's.  That means he scored
*    on average 1 six in every 8 matches he played in; and
*    on average he scored 6 fours per match
On the other hand the same figures for De Kock after 35 matches means he scored -
*    on average 1 six in every 1,94 matches he played in; and
*    on average he scored 6 fours per match 4,6 fours in every match played.
Smith ended up with an average score of 37.98 per innigs.   In the last few years his average declined rapidly - but he never in his career in ODI's  had an average higher than 40.    
I give Smith credit for an outstanding cricket career - but he was never the best opeer around and his figures showed that.   However, my main problem remains with Mozart in his attack on De Kock -  nothing else.  
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 Jan 2015, 15:02
#27
12 Jan 2015, 15:02#27
 DA
I am not daring to compare the two players.   What I was on about is that  Mozart went bonkers - like he normally does.
However strictly speaking Smith batted in 194 matches.    He scored 24 6's and 1165 4's.  That means he scored
*    on average 1 six in every 8 matches he played in; and
*    on average he scored 6 fours per match
On the other hand the same figures for De Kock after 35 matches means he scored -
*    on average 1 six in every 1,94 matches he played in; and
*    on average he scored 6 fours per match 4,6 fours in every match played.
Smith ended up with an average score of 37.98 per innigs.   In the last few years his average declined rapidly - but he never in his career in ODI's  had an average higher than 40.    
I give Smith credit for an outstanding cricket career - but he was never the best opeer around and his figures showed that.   However, my main problem remains with Mozart in his attack on De Kock -  nothing else.  
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
12 Jan 2015, 15:29
#28
12 Jan 2015, 15:29#28

What most of this misses is the fight in the dog. A CWC final is as much about controlling nerves and mental strength in the clutch. The Proteas have a long history of not having mental stability and panicking. I would favour emotionally steady guys where the call is close.

 

In that light I prefer R Peterson, Tahir, van Zyl and Rossouw  to Duminy(the bowler), De Kock, Miller and the very inexperienced Harmer.

 

To put the burden on Duminy to have to bowl 10 overs in a CWC final is a sure way to have him flop with bat and ball.

 

For purposes of planning one has to assume in a CWC final you wont be facing the long hops that a guy like Holder bowled yesterday....but a sharp well directed Aussie pace attack. I just can't see Miller and de Kock meeting that test. Nor can I see Harmer holding up to a rampant batting side.

 

Again if you don't believe nerves do these guys in, look at Abbott's last over yesterday. Hell, look at the first ball of his last over.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
12 Jan 2015, 16:01
#29
12 Jan 2015, 16:01#29

No Moz, Peterson is not good enough to play and therefore should not be considered.

 

Miller is top of the table in terms of mental toughness......he has proved that in the last 12 months.

 

JP is a must, one of our best bats and a handy bowler. He is our only real allrounder. He is great at ticking the scoreboard over.   

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 Jan 2015, 16:07
#30
12 Jan 2015, 16:07#30
Lets look at the following statement:-
"I would favour emotionally steady guys where the call is close."
So Mozart has made a character study of all the players and he knows them so well that he can determine "emotionally stable guys".   Afterwards he comes up with R Petersen being a steady guy and also with four others - and then the allegation that Miller and De Kock would not be able to stand a pace attack of the Aussies.   
The same  guys played well against the selfsame pace attack of the Aussies in Harare and De Kock scored 48 runs in one ODI and a century in another in Australia.   But then Mozart claims they are unstable.    
The BS in buckets again -  Rossouw and  Petersen are good - Miller and De Kock not acceptable.   Robin Petersen is good enough - Harmer is not.   Nerves is doing the unacceptable guys in after he made such an intense study of their personalities.   To p rove that Abbott panicked in his last over - so De Kock and Miller failed.
Hell - if you believe the above load of BS - you will also believe  the moon is made of green cheese.   Mozart at his best dispensing BS is the normal situation on this site in any event. 



MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
12 Jan 2015, 16:08
#31
12 Jan 2015, 16:08#31

You guys have watched much more cricket than I have Dave, we have only just recently got an all cricket channel called "Willow".....a marvellous thing! So what I say here may be easily contradicted.....but I don't see Duminy as a player with "bottle". I have seen him play some good innings, but I can't say I think of him as coming through in the clutch.

 

 

That said I would pick him as I showed above ....I would simply not rely on him to bowl 10 overs.

 

As for Miller, the call is close with Rossouw or van Zyl. But again when has he come through at international level.....once in the Aussie series and big time yesterday, but the WI bowling was terrible.

 

Still I can see the appeal of that big hitting and I wouldn't be against starting  the WC with him at 5 or 6.....but he'd have to produce the goods early.

DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
12 Jan 2015, 16:22
#32
12 Jan 2015, 16:22#32
clevermike

Status:Hall Of Fame
Posts: 14696 RE: Protea starting eleven...in the light of another young pop gun flop
January 12, 2015, 16:07:17Hell - if you believe the above load of BS - you will also believe the moon is made of green cheese.

 

Don't be an idiot Mike

 

We all know it's white cheese... not green

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
12 Jan 2015, 17:27
#33
12 Jan 2015, 17:27#33

JP has struggled to assert himself at test level but has been very good in ODI's over the past 2 years or so. We don't have a class spinner, so JP is our best bet given he is a good bat.

 

His 10 overs would be no better or worse than Peterson's. Harmer looks good but then again he is only and offie and hardly going to rip sides apart.

 

Miller has found his feet in the last 12 months, he no longer looks like he is playing for his spot every game. The lad has a hard edge......he is perfect for us at 6 or 7 for man when he hits it, it stays hit.

 

Tahir is good but can be very expensive when he gets it wrong. He is our best spinner.  

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 Jan 2015, 17:38
#34
12 Jan 2015, 17:38#34
DA


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
12 Jan 2015, 20:03
#35
12 Jan 2015, 20:03#35
For heaven sake Mike change your avatar.....having that kid represent an old codger like you is a disconnect.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 Jan 2015, 20:53
#36
12 Jan 2015, 20:53#36
 Mozart
I use pics of players I admire as my avatar.   It has everything to do with the sport we discuss on this site and nothing to do with myself.   So I am waiting for the Super Rugby season to start and then I will change my avatar to Pieter-Steph du Toit - definitely not the useless hasbeen Matfield which  you apparently admire.      
GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
12 Jan 2015, 23:19
#37
12 Jan 2015, 23:19#37
I tend to disagree with emphasis on individual selection of players...in any team game.

The combined unit is the key...as long as the construction compliments each one and they can compliment and operate as a team. A team with prima donnas looks good but still can be good if they compliment each other but often individualists are selfish players...the essence is to create a side that works together as a unit...comprises of individuals who understand each other and the game plan.

I used to think this only applies to soccer and rugby but it can also apply to cricket as well.

Cricket is slightly different in a context because you activities are more isolated...you're either batting or bowling/fielding but this is especially true to the bowling/fielding team. To an equally important issue so are the 2 batsmen in....some batsmen bring out the best in each other when they take on the bowlers.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
13 Jan 2015, 00:23
#38
13 Jan 2015, 00:23#38
Disagree teams are about selecting the best individuals and from that get them to play as a team. I have never been one who ascribes to selecting say an inferior 9 because he happens to know his 10 very well.
Select your best 15 or 11 and make sure they are awarded the time to get to know eachother well and gel as a unit.
The very reason the Boks are falling short as are out T 20 side is because they don't comprise the best players.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news