FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Rassie Erasmus the new favourite for Bok coach?

Rassie Erasmus the new favourite for Bok coach?

Started by Rooinek75 REPLIES2,040 VIEWS· 26 Jan 2016, 20:01
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Feb 2016, 06:40
#41
01 Feb 2016, 06:40#41
 We have better talent available than the old goats Mozart supported.  His hatred of some players because they threatened the selection of Matfield, Alberts, Jannie du Plessis, Morne Steyn, etc is pathetic ad indicates a total inability to understand rugby.    
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
01 Feb 2016, 15:22
#42
01 Feb 2016, 15:22#42

PSDT has never been out of his depth........I'd rather have 19 year old RG Snyman in my Bok side than the utterly useless Matfield who no longer makes the Saints bench given how many games he has cost them.


In his last game for Saints I counted 4 possessions conceded by the old man......no wonder they lost patience with the old fart......they were of course stupid enough to sign him in the first place.


Apparently he takes lost of notes!!!  

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Feb 2016, 15:58
#43
01 Feb 2016, 15:58#43
 Dave
I may be wrong - but Ouma Victoria was playing for the Saints this past weekend against Wasps and the major contributor to their loss.  
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
01 Feb 2016, 17:57
#44
01 Feb 2016, 17:57#44
You 'may be wrong' but you are convinced he was a 'major contributor to their loss'? What the hell does that mean ...he did or he didn't? Meanwhile Humungous thinks 'he no longer makes their bench'.
Perhaps you fools should get your facts straight first.

As for Stephanie, the kid competed with Coenie and Kriel for our most out of their depth  player at the RWC. But Stephanie gets my vote....totally useless.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Feb 2016, 18:33
#45
01 Feb 2016, 18:33#45
 Mozart
He gave away two penalties - both converted by Wasps - that to start with.  The man is of no value anymore and that is a fact as well.   
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Feb 2016, 18:48
#46
01 Feb 2016, 18:48#46
 The most out of depth players at the RWC were Alberts, Pienaar, Morne Steyn,  Matfield and Jannie du Plessis because they were so far beyond their sell-by dates.   Fact        
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
01 Feb 2016, 19:16
#47
01 Feb 2016, 19:16#47
Man of the Match Victor in the playoff final out of his depth? Hahaha....how many MOMS did Kriel, Stephanie and Coenie get. Stephanie was kid out there weak and stunningly clumsy.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Feb 2016, 19:59
#48
01 Feb 2016, 19:59#48
 That is the kind of idiocy that turned the squad last year into a serious joke.   MOM in a match against the Argentina B-team - where the wrong player got the  MOM because it was his last test.  He was as useless in that game as he was in the rest of the tournament - the real MOM in that game should have been Malherbe.
If Victoria was such a good player in the WC - why is he such  a disgrace two months on for his club?   Weak Du Toit?  Nobody could be as physically deficient as Matfield is.  What a joke !!!      
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
01 Feb 2016, 21:36
#49
01 Feb 2016, 21:36#49
 It wasn't the B locks old chap....check it out. He dominated the first string Bargie pair, hence he got the MOM award. Malherbe by contrast was up against a B prop. S o kind of you to have raised the issue.
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
02 Feb 2016, 09:29
#50
02 Feb 2016, 09:29#50
 
Rassie's been out of the loop for many a year.

Does he even remember what it's like to coach a team ... I mean without flipping light switches and sending out Morse code messages from on high???

Is he seriously the best we can come up with? Talk about being desperate.

All I can say is ... STAY AWAY FROM ACKERMAN!!!!!!!

 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Feb 2016, 10:06
#51
02 Feb 2016, 10:06#51
 The last contribution of the fool was as follows:-
"It wasn't the B locks old chap....check it out. He dominated the first string Bargie pair, hence he got the MOM award. Malherbe by contrast was up against a B prop. So kind of you to have raised the issue"
Rugby happens to be a team sport and the team fielded by the Argentinians was decidedly below the team fielded in the semi - yet he claimed that Victoria dominated his opposing players.   Victoria was piss-poor in the game against Japan and he made a major contribution to the loss against New Zealand - but the fool carried on about the failed player.
When De Jager was MOM in a game against a full National side - he derided the decision - yet against a decidedly "B" team he is all agog about Victoria.   
Mozart once again proved he is the prime idiot on this site - trying to convince us that a failed player was an acceptable selection for the WC squad.  Why does he not answer the following  question:-
"If Victoria was such a good player in the WC - why is he such  a disgrace two months on for his club?"
Several layers of egg over his mug and he still adds to it by the day.             
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Feb 2016, 20:43
#52
02 Feb 2016, 20:43#52
Matfield was brought back this last weekend as Lawes is on England duty and yes once again he was as pathetic as he has been since his return to rugby
Matfield was not close to being MOM in that 3rd place playoff against the Argie B side......the best Bok player by some distance was Malherbe
As for PSDT, he had very little action in the WC......he replaced Alberts at 7 and was far superior in that game
Out of his depth my arse......as I have said, PSDT has never been out of his depth and never will be.....is going to be a Bok for the next decade.
The only disgrace this WC was Matfield who lost us the semi......worst player in the squad along with Kirchner, Mvovo, Jean, Morne, Pienaar, Jannie, Brits and Alberts
Our best players were JP, Habana, de Allende, Kriel, Pollard, Lambie, du Preez, Beast, Bismark, Strauss, Nyakane, Malherbe, Etzebeth, Lood, Vermeulen and Schalk........the best player being Lood, closely followed by Etzebeth, Malherbe and de Allende.
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
05 Feb 2016, 17:26
#53
05 Feb 2016, 17:26#53
 .
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,234 posts
27 May 2020, 00:56
#54
27 May 2020, 00:56#54
One of the first Rassie threads showing early fans and critics.
---
mozart

Hall Of Fame

31319 posts

Jan 27, 2016, 06:14

 Great coaches have character. To me Rassie is always running away from the task rather than embracing it....and Mallett is the critics critic. I would take Coetzee in a heart beat vs these two show ponies.

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
27 May 2020, 01:06
#55
27 May 2020, 01:06#55

Any solid arguments from either yourself, Beeno or ou Maaikie that you would bracket in with anything in the video that I posted? 

The floor is yours. 

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,234 posts
27 May 2020, 01:12
#56
27 May 2020, 01:12#56
Some of us do not need to be as spoonfed to identify talent...
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
27 May 2020, 02:33
#57
27 May 2020, 02:33#57

Oops and who was wrong 100% on the Erasmus issue,  Who would have gone  with Coetzee in a flash?   

Now we have a case where we had the great Meyer - always supported by Mozart - and Flashguy   Coetzee Mozart's new favourite after the Japan disaster was the final nail in the coffin of Meyer,  So Mozart's selection of Coetzee turned out to be a worse disaster than Meyer was as Coach,

Now we have to be reminded about the attacks o n Erasmus by especially Mozart and AO when rumors started doing he rounds that the President and CEO of SA Rugby went to Irelamd to plead with Erasmus to come back to SA and try and save SA Rugby from the ashes Meyer and Coetzee left it in.

The howls before the appointment of Erasmus was equaled by the screams at the end of 2018 when the critics did  not want to see positive signs emerging from the side,   They did not want to admit that for the first time in a decade the Springboks won an away test against the AB's.  And then the chorus re-opened when Erasmus had the audacity to  send his first choice 15 players to New Zealand two weeks before the start of the RC in 2019,   

After winning the RC trophy the real jokes emerged -   the performance of the 2015 Springboks - who lost al three RC tests - were better than the Cup winners in 2019.    Anyway - the situation for the Erasmus haters got worse when the Springboks beat the much improved Japan side 41-7 in the RC warm-up game before - and then the final hurrah for them when the AB's beat the Springboks in the first game in the RWC,   They obviously forgot that in 2015 the Springboks lost their first game in the RWC against - wait for it -  Japan,   

Anyway lets forget the doomsday stories after the semi-final after Wales managed to draw level with the Springboks a couple of times and in the end lost the game.   AO was too big a coward to write anything on site,    So the Springboks demolished the England team and the jeremiads started immediately -  the Springboks lost against the All Blacks in the series, so the AB's are the best team in the world.   The joke was that the English beat the AB's easily in the semi and the Springboks demolishing the English team meant nothing.   Even the NZ commentators said the AB's would have had no chance in beating the Springboks in the final.

Round about the week before the WC final it came out that it would be Erasmus last game as coach and that a new Head coach  would be appointed soon,   That was enough to set off the drama queens in full cry,   The more they were told that Erasmus was appointed as SARU Director of Rugby and never as Head Coach and that he took on the Head Coach duties only as an interim measure until a new Head Coach would be appointed - the cowardice stories flooded the site again.  

It got even worse when after the public outcry Erasmus assured the Springbok supporters that he will have a more hands-on approach  as Director of Rugby and especially when it came out that SARU will appoint the coaches Erasmus identified and that one lasted for near to two months,  Since then we had a new story - Erasmus was useless as a coach - Nienaber was the real reason for winning the WC and the only players our great rugby geniuses praised on site were Beast and Mostert.   

How can our local rugby experts get it so wrong,  2019 was a disaster for them and then some worse news followed - their preferred coaches got fired by their clubs for gross incompetence,

So what are they going to come up with next???                                                  

               

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
27 May 2020, 03:23
#58
27 May 2020, 03:23#58

Ceradyne

Thanks for the question.   There are some things that I genuinely had doubts about,   One of thee major ones was the selection of a 6-2 combination for the bench - the so-called "bomb squad",  For the rest I was critical of the amount of kicking by especially Faf and it was an eye-opener for me to see what came out in the two videos of Squidge.    

I genuinely supported Erasmus's  team selections and realized how he assigned special roles to players - but at the same time used the natural talent of players and fine-tuned it and the ro les he assigned to Du Toit and De Allende, 

I also read some articles in which the Munster players commented on Erasmus as coach in the time he was there,    They found something new in his approach - probably his studious approach to the game - but they found him to be a top class coach,  I also was not surprised when James O'Connor said positive things about Erasmus as a coach.                      

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
27 May 2020, 12:09
#59
27 May 2020, 12:09#59

“ Posted by: clevermike (41333 posts)

May 27, 2020, 03:23

Ceradyne

Thanks for the question.   There are some things that I genuinely had doubts about,   One of thee major ones was the selection of a 6-2 combination for the bench - the so-called "bomb squad",   “

OK. So you do admit that that could not have been one of your arguments that would have convinced me about Rassie. I’m looking for your arguments that “could be bracketed in with those in the video” that would have convinced me. This one contradicts the video. And it is a big one because the bomb squad was one of Rassie’s core strategies.

“  For the rest I was critical of the amount of kicking by especially Faf and it was an eye-opener for me to see what came out in the two videos of Squidge.    “

Granted. As was I. So, you agree with me that you could not have convinced me on that argument either. 

“ I genuinely supported Erasmus's  team selections and realized how he assigned special roles to players “

I‘m not saying that you are lying, and I could not have witnessed you physically posting that, but it is hard to picture you doing it with a straight face and without having your fingers crossed behind your back. 

Shall we discuss your blind support for Jantjies, Mostert and Frans Steyn being included in the squad?

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
27 May 2020, 12:45
#60
27 May 2020, 12:45#60

Windpomp you are being a dumbass. 

I have been touting Rassie from his captaining and coaching Free State and arguing for his coaching ability in probably hundreds of posts. 

You say nobody gave you sufficient evidence to get you to change your mind about Rassie!!

What a silly argument. The evidence to see Rassie was good was right before your eyes! Why didn't YOU see it like others did.

Are you dependent on others having to. c onvince you when you yourself can make a judgement. 

Fact is Windpomp you got it all wrong. Just admit it and move on and stop blaming others for your huge error in judgement.

Mike and I and even Sharktwit got it right. The frot shark followed my advise and got it right. That should have been a lesson for him. Bwahahahaha!!! 

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
27 May 2020, 12:52
#61
27 May 2020, 12:52#61

Ou dense Denise said - he (Rassie) is just another pretender - next.

Dense probably thought he sounded very cool very decisive, the last word in the debate. Move on guys I dense have got this covered. 

It's hilarious and makes the board such a funny place!!!! 

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
27 May 2020, 13:43
#62
27 May 2020, 13:43#62

"What a silly argument. The evidence to see Rassie was good was right before your eyes! Why didn't YOU see it like others did. "

Go on then. Give me examples of where, before the start of RWC2019, you provided any solid evidence of Rassie's brilliance. Other than your usual breathless adjectives like "he's a brilliant rugby rugby brain". Or he has an eye for detail - I have fokol idea of what detail he has an eye for, but I read somewhere that he has an eye for detail. Or he won the CC with the Free State. Or the was the brain behind Coetzee when he was still with the Stormers. He was responsible every time when the Stormers did OK but the times they fucked up. No, that had nothing to do with him. Those rested squarely on Coetzee alone. etc, etc, etc.

Where did you explain away his inclusion of the list of players that I have given time and again?

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
27 May 2020, 13:56
#63
27 May 2020, 13:56#63

Go and look at your thread about how you changed your mind. I posted a summary as to what you are up too. 

Hilarious stuff from the Windpomper! 

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
27 May 2020, 14:26
#64
27 May 2020, 14:26#64

OK. I’m on my way there. You coming along?

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 May 2020, 14:52
#65
27 May 2020, 14:52#65

I doubted Rassie after the Welsh WC game.

At the time, I said, I'm starting to doubt him and the permanent kicking game plan, but I do hope that there is a switch in tactics on the cards for the final...

So my doubt was padded with a prediction which turned out to be not too far off. 

Eddie Jones was completely blindsided by the Boks suddenly spreading the ball early and it helped us get early momentum and ultimately win the game.

For me, let's give the Jake Whites and Rassies their credit because hell, a WC final win isn't something that comes along every day.




CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
27 May 2020, 18:42
#66
27 May 2020, 18:42#66

Ceradyne

I was talking about the play-off games - not the squad selection.   To be quite frank I would not have picked Jantjies and Steyn and had reservations about Mostert as well - especially after his poor performances in the RC.   But there were reasons those three were picked and in the end all three were basically dirt trackers starting against weaker teams and Steyn and Mostert playing from the bench.

   

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
27 May 2020, 20:25
#67
27 May 2020, 20:25#67

You would make a spin doctor dizzy. 

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
28 May 2020, 15:03
#68
28 May 2020, 15:03#68

Eddie Jones wasn't blindsided by anything. The Boks were very predictable from beginning to end. To think that Jones saw something different or something he couldn't comprehend is deluded and insullting to the man. The game is won and lost in the trenches. The Boks beat the Poms in the set pieces and collisions. It's that simple. The was no tactical variation or new plays or patterns. Throwing the ball wide of a three man pod is something the Boks have done a lot of under Rassie. Think back to the EOYT of 2018, or the second Argie test of 2018, or the 2019 RC, they even did it in the WC. Nothing new. Dour Stompie phase play made succesful with a couple moments of individual magic by two wings. 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
28 May 2020, 16:05
#69
28 May 2020, 16:05#69
Eddie was completely blindsided - was completely outsmarted on the day - fact Obvious change in tactics in all the 3 playoff games The subtle change in kicking from 9 to 10 in the final threw the poor Poms - beautifully subtle but so effective Rassie is a master tactician - makes the rest of our Bok coaches look like a bunch of puppets The man is a rugby genius
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
28 May 2020, 16:29
#70
28 May 2020, 16:29#70

"The subtle change in kicking from 9 to 10 in the final threw the poor Poms - beautifully subtle but so effective"

That's true, but the Poms should have figured it out the second time they got suckered...and probably did...it was our defense trench warfare and intensity that got to the Poms. We absorbed the pressure and waited for the opportunities.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
28 May 2020, 16:50
#71
28 May 2020, 16:50#71
If you prepare for kicks from the 9 you are already in position to receive the kick. The 9 kicks blindly hoping for the best. You shift it to 10, those waiting for the kick from 9 will be caught in two minds, are the Boks running it or is 10 going to kick. Kicking from 10 gives you scope to survey and position your kick accordingly It only takes a few of these subtle changes to throw the opposition and set the tone for the game. The Poms were all over the show, with Youngs and co throwing wild passes to nowhere
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
28 May 2020, 17:09
#72
28 May 2020, 17:09#72

I think the Poms were over confident and the few subtle difference in our play unsettled them...as did our impenetrable defense....and losing Sinckler....it wasn't their day...the Boks made sure of it.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
28 May 2020, 22:44
#73
28 May 2020, 22:44#73
It’s hardly ever the Poms day when it comes to playing the Boks
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,234 posts
29 May 2020, 00:33
#74
29 May 2020, 00:33#74
England and the Boks have traditionally had the strongest forward packs over the last 20 years or so.
Sometimes both have played lots of 10 man rugby, and sometimes good attacking XV man rugby. 

The Boks are a bogey team for England, just like England is "bit" of a bogey team for New Zealand. 
New Zealand changed their game plan for the semi vs England and put lock Barrat at loose forward to add more power to the pack. However, it did not work well with the England pack dominating possession, and the All Blacks looked slower to the rucks resulting in fewer opportunities for turnovers. 
Barrat was wasted at XV, instead of being at 10.
Even if the All Black pack gets less than 50% possession and territory, Barrat at 10 gives them more opportunist and counter-attacking chances. 
The standard game plan was used against Ireland, who lacked the pace to keep up with the high tempo All Black game. The All Blacks sacrificed this somewhat in the semi and they looked well of the pace against England. Their forward pack was weaker than cheerleaders and they were not nearly physical enough. 
England was arguably the favourites going into the final having knocked out the All Blacks, but they had a really slow start, and then eventually getting back into the game for the Bomb squad to put them away. 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 May 2020, 03:45
#75
29 May 2020, 03:45#75

What still amazes me is that after being he first team ever to win the RC and WC in the same year the nonsense spouted by some members about Erasmus  continued,   The only thing they come up with is that Erasmus played no role in winning the two trophies - it was all done by Proudfoot and Nienaber,  

That being said they forgot that Erasmus was the key person involved with the selection of the coaching staff and that it was he who brought in three key appointees -  Nienaber, Felix Jones and Walters.    Nienaber was for near to 15 years working with Erasmus and they are not only close friends - Nienaber admitted openly that in that period he learned all he knows about rugby coaching from Erasmus,   

Jones had one thing in common with Erasmus and that was his studious approach to the game.  If one watch carefully you would notice how many times during games the two  high-fived each other when one of the obvious strategies were implemented faultlessly,   What was also new is that Jones was appointed permanently as part of the  coaching squad with a special assignment of keeping a close check of Springboks and potential Springboks playing club rugby in Europe, He also has to advise them on  new strategies developed by the coaching staff,  Walters - the fitness coach has now left the Springboks and was big a loss as Proudfoot,   

The losses of Proudfoot  and Walters were no real surprises.   They showed real class as part if the Erasmus coaching set-up - and their market value increased drastically,    Proudfoot was always a good forwards coach, but under Coetzee he did himself no favors - under Erasmus he reached a new height in coaching achievements.

One can only believe that the real reason for their dislike is that Erasmus showed that their first choice coaches - Meyer and Coetzee -  were inadequate and Erasmus showed why they were not up to standard.    Some members refused to ever admit that they were wrong about things and Erasmus is proof of their main idiocies spouted on site for years,                    .                             

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
29 May 2020, 08:35
#76
29 May 2020, 08:35#76

Aug,

Not being prepared and not being able to comprehend ain't the same thing.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news