Ha ha ha, Mozart
Rassie the rugby genius :)
The first CTS was woke AF and overdramatic like WWE......still very watchable, so this installment will be too.
Fattex's life...
Don't stress about it Mpow er
For someone to really insult you... you would have to at the very least, value their opinion in the first place
Saffex: Rassie is a genius, hence the selection of DDA in an of itself proves DDA is "va bestest 12 in the game."
Also Saffex: Rassie is a genius but he selected Mostert and Mostert is a useless powder-puff.
I’m all in for the three-peat …..if we can win the RWC three times with a coach who never once gave the backline any instruction but ‘kick if in doubt, kick in your own half, kick if we are in the lead, kick if they are down to 14 men, kick if there are less than 20 minutes to go, kick if the wind is blowing, kick if it’s raining and always follow up a kick with a kick….we must be the best rugby nation on the planet.
D ave
No one can argue with people like Mozart and his prejudiced supporters on anything relating to playes and especially supporters of the dead backline game plan that ruled S A since 1992 They supported every coach whosegame plan was the kicking of shit out of a ball. Mozart constantly attack anybody who did not subcribe to that idiocy of Mozart of "Traditional Springbok Rugby" and in 2014 wrote that 90% of the functions of a flyhalf relates to kicking away balls, Now his story is changed to supporting backline play and claim exactly the opposite'
He still does not understand the difference between strategic kickig and BS kicking - the preserve of players like Morne Steyn. He is a great admirer of White - and does not realize that White really have no idea about backline play. He supported Meye throughout the period 2012 to 2015. Meyer nearly destroyed the Springboks and Pollard as a playr. - beause he tried to covert Pollard to a kicking obsessed fyhalf and often played Lambie ahead of Pollard in tests.
.
. . . .
Hahahahaha ou mampara power think it's luck to win two consequetive RWCs!!!
Mozzietard making a jackass of himself whinging away about Rassie and his Boks winning the recent RWC.
Man what a comedy these clowns provide.
I don't often agree with you Baboon-ou but I'm with you on this one.
Picturing Moffie and Doos XL on their knees in front of their TVs begging for France to turn it around in the QF, willing England to hold on in the semi and praying for a miracle comeback from the All Blacks in the final gave me a good chuckle.
Reading their whiny excuses afterwards about the 14 men, the naughty ref and the lack of tries literally made me laugh out loud.
LMAO!
Best comedy on this board in a long time!
14 men isn’t an excuse it’s a reality, you were right before we beat a 14 man NZ team.
HasBeen the rugby has nothing on the egg you will be drowning in when an 80 year old man, with signs of senility takes down your god Donald Rump.
What a weird evening on the board!
Moffie, I don't often agree with you but I'm with you on this one!
43x 0.25 points per minute= 10.75 points
1-10.75 points= minus 9.75 points.
Rounded up to the nearest integer equals 10points… the amount the ABs exceeded the handicapped result. We should have beaten them by 11 points…we beat them by 1….factoring in the value of the card, derived in a large statistical study based on 100s of games.
Add in the 5 points for missed AB kicks….and we were outplayed by 15 points in general play.
And some think this was genius.
Case closed and put in the vault.
Dave you are entering CleverMike territory with your denial that the ABs were down a man for a net 43 minutes. Straighten up and fly right.
That doesn’t help your genius argument…if being without a regular hooker was a disadvantage Erasmus shouldn’t have relied on Fourie.
No he was there because he was the best man for the job.
Next, the rain had the biggest effect on the team that was trying to play rugby…the ABs.
….
Nope Erasmus had no game plan except kicking which he continued to do even though we had a man advantage. We passed 84 times to NZ’s 221…even though we should have been the attacking team.
No game plan except, tackle, kick and scrum. Even then it took a perfect kicking performance from Pollard and a red card to get us home. Genius….you have to be kidding.
Let’s leave it there….you believe he is a genius. I believe he is a competent forward coach and in sync with the players, but a very limited all round coach…evidenced by the need to get in new backline coaches and the limited rugby we have played under his leadership.
You think the WC win was choreographed, I think it was a series of lucky events that narrowly saw us home.
You are totally satisfied with the win… contrary to belief, I’m always happier when we win, but I have no illusions about the quality of our wins and I’m sorry our rugby now mimics the 1960 Bools.
You think we have a great talent pool, I agree. Which is why the manner of winning particularly in the final was so unsatisfying.
Any time you win by one point there is a measure of luck….win by one point three times in a row you are damn lucky. Now go and play with your Rassie doll.
Pfffft 15 points below the handicap score…. .Genius!!!!! Gosh to be that successful Eluckmiss must have piped the NZ anthem into the players bedrooms as they slept…..you can fool some of the supporters all the time,
mozart
Hall Of Fame
41117 posts
Apr 15, 2024, 13:1310 (Frizell) +53(Cane)-10(Kolisi)-10(Kolbe)=43 minutes
43x 0.25 points per minute= 10.75 points
1-10.75 points= minus 9.75 points.
Rounded up to the nearest integer equals 10points… the amount the ABs exceeded the handicapped result. We should have beaten them by 11 points…we beat them by 1….factoring in the value of the card, derived in a large statistical study based on 100s of games.
Add in the 5 points for missed AB kicks….and we were outplayed by 15 points in general play.
And some think this was genius.
Case closed and put in the vault.
mozart
Hall Of Fame
41117 posts
Apr 15, 2024, 13:1310 (Frizell) +53(Cane)-10(Kolisi)-10(Kolbe)=43 minutes
43x 0.25 points per minute= 10.75 points
1-10.75 points= minus 9.75 points.
Rounded up to the nearest integer equals 10points… the amount the ABs exceeded the handicapped result. We should have beaten them by 11 points…we beat them by 1….factoring in the value of the card, derived in a large statistical study based on 100s of games.
Add in the 5 points for missed AB kicks….and we were outplayed by 15 points in general play.
And some think this was genius.
Case closed and put in the vault.
It takes account of the Boks down to 14. You just don’t understand equations….no wonder you did law Dave.
More from Rugby
- RugbyScotland dominate the stats50 REPLIES · 199 VIEWS
- RugbySpringboks vs Scotland - Monday retrospective26 REPLIES · 155 VIEWS
- RugbyUnder 20 Springbok team to play the Under 20 England team i the RWC semi on Mondat14 REPLIES · 109 VIEWS
- RugbyMonday Morning Team12 REPLIES · 92 VIEWS
- NewsIreland Test Reveals All Blacks' World Cup Fixes1 REPLIES
- NewsIreland Test Reveals All Blacks' World Cup Fixes0 REPLIES