
sharkbok
Captain23,252 posts

sharkbokCaptain23,252 posts
18 Mar 2019, 12:18#9
I am quoting from the article, I do not claim to have been involved in the negotiation of the terms of the deal.
It was 40 million, and within something like 5 years of singing the deal , it is to be double.
That is not standard bank rate interests, and the quote from that article seems to imply that some form of payment has happened.
18 Mar 2019, 13:14#11
Mike, stop dreaming up BS. Remgro is a massive organisation and rugby is a minute part of it. Remgro has fokol to do with the day to day running of rugby in the Union. Least of all of the Bulls franchise. Their shareholding is in the Blue Bulls Company. There involvement is in the financial and commercial side of the business.
18 Mar 2019, 14:24#14
“Stop calling up shit the way you do. Remgro is not a piss p9ot UK company .....”
Thank you for confirming what I said. “Remgro is a massive organisation......”
18 Mar 2019, 14:32#15
“Stop calling up shit the way you do. Remgro is not a piss p9ot UK company - it was the major shareholder in Saracens Club. ”
Remgro may have been “A” major shareholder but they have never been “THE” major shareholder in Saracens. They had a 50% stake wither Nigel Wray having the other 50%. They were co-owners but never majority shareholders.
18 Mar 2019, 15:13#19
“Posted by: clevermike (34942 posts)
Mar 18, 2019, 14:46
Sorry - BSter - it was in response to what SB wrote - because you are worth ignoring anyway. So 50% is not a major shareholder shitbrain?”
Let me try again. I never said that Remgro wasn’t A, let me repeat that, A majority share holder. See that? A majority share holder. What I did dispute was the fact that you said that they were THE, let me repeat that, THE majority share holder. See that? THE majority share holder. There is a subtle, yet important, difference.
As I said on many occasions, language comprehension is not your strong suit.
18 Mar 2019, 15:39#21
As I said, language comprehension is not your strong suit. You do not even understand the difference between a major shareholder and the major shareholder.
“...The major share holder...” by implication, means the majority shareholder.
A majority share holder, by implication, means “one” of the major shareholders.
Can you see the difference now, or do you need me to draw you some pictures as well?