Pakie
No problem with that argument - but neither of Silly Billy nor Mozart used that in their arguments above. If they did it would not have caused the BS they spread on site and that is the end of the story.
Why try when you can't be bothered to read what I wrote in my original post. I already specified what the criteria was for each category. Reading has been a bit of a problem for you old chap. Note the Slade debacle, did I not specify attack? Yes I did. What's your next excuse? It was edited in? It's been an old trump card of yours.
The wriggly wee wirm wouldn't be quite so wriggly if he found himself a new hobby.
Silly Billy
If you ever wrote any sense on this site you would not be constantly be regarded as an ignorant fool.. You specified but did not sue the same when you came up with very real BS by not applying he criteria you now admit is the case after Pakie mentioned it.
Whether you ever call somebody a worm - that worm is still more trustworthy than you as the habitual liar you are.
What about your Slade vs Kriel statement in the November test - why the absence of an admission that you lied as per normal in that case.
.
Duplication
I never lied, and you have never been able to prove me a liar. You've been caught out too many times yourself. Each and every day!
By the way? How was Damian's day at the office?
Silly Billy
I make mistakes and if I do I apologize. You write total misrepresentations on site and whenb caught out and try and duck out of it, Continuous justification what you write on site can only be interpreted as lies,
Problem is it entails about 90% of all your contributions on site. Just look at the Slade statement - it is factually BS and can only be called a lie. Your thread on the Stormers-Jaguares game is equally flawed, There is a difference between a fool and a liar, The first is a total rugby illiterate - which you no doubt are - and a liar is one totally distorting facts - which you also are,
I am merely a steamroller. I neither tarry to the left, nor to the right. Stay in my way and you will become an abstract work of art.
Ag Foeitog - the freak thinks he can use misrepresentations and outright lies to justify "steamrolling" anybody. LMAO
" to justify "steamrolling"anybody."
As long as you acknowledge it happened.
Basteraud dominated the Boks, quite easily, including Kriel.
Kriel scored four tries last year. They were:
"if you score a try you change the game regardless of end result"
Do we have another pupil for 'Auge's Centre for Children Who Can't Read Good And Wanna Learn To Do Other Stuff Good Too' ?
He busted Kriel open. Dominated Kriel, and Kolisi too. Was the best centre on the field. As per the Kriel tries, which one changed the momentum of the game? None.
Did you even watch that game? You don't seem to know anything about it. I asked you, which try changed the momentum of any of those games? You can't answer me.
I know very well. You are clutching desperately at straws.
Dave
Silly Billy will argue about something he knows zero of. And Mozart should also know when he is talking BS. He said initially on test level Kriel is no 6 in ranking and he changed that top no 12
Now who is ahead of Kriel then? Let us have a joke and let him list the 11 players
Slades ranking would of just gone up with a good draw and pass for Nowells try.
Now who is ahead of Kriel then? Let us have a joke and let him list the 11 players
How about you get off your virtual arse and go see for yourself instead of having other people running around doing the work for you?
Pakie
I do not get involved in silliness - I leave that to you, Silly Bplly and Mozart.
This thread was started by Silly Billy producing the most weird info maginable. He mixed up ratings of players on all levels of games so as to arrive at a rating for players, It was obviously BS and Mozart, Ceradunce and you were quick to join Silly Billy in his stupidity.
Then Mozart and Ceradunce joined in to say that different levels can be dealt with separately 0 and came up with the comical idea that Kriel is the number 6 ranked player on test level - changing it subsequently to the number 12 ranked player,
I loved jokes they made the statement and all I ask t6hem is that I provide they must provide the evidence to proof it.
The dunces writs constant B stories about Morne Steyn on site - why don't you find him on this wonderful site and tell us what his ranking as a flyhalf is, That would eb another joke to appreciate,
No Wasps
They made3 statements on site and all I ask them to prove it on site, I know you are trying to belittle me - but that will not work - I am not interested in silly discussions like the dimmest on site ever - Silly Billy - has come up and when he persisted I asked him to prove what they wrote and I include Mozart, Ceradunce , Oakie and co to provide the evidence they has written on site.
You are 100% welcome to join the list of members mentioned by you. .
No Wasps
They made3 statements on site and all I ask them to prove it on site, I know you are trying to belittle me - but that will not work - I am not interested in silly discussions like the dimmest on site ever - Silly Billy - has come up and when he persisted I asked him to prove what they wrote and I include Mozart, Ceradunce , Oakie and co to provide the evidence they has written on site.
You are 100% welcome to join the list of members mentioned by you. .
Well said Pakie. Those who spit their dummy out, and who rely on personal attacks, they offer virtually nothing. There is a lot of information put on the forum that leaves a lot of room for interesting and diverse discussions. Alas, we are feeding pigeons. Poor incentive to continue investing that kind of input.
The critical info to support your crazy silliness is what should be on site, - but iot would enver be because you will look even more silly than you are already,
Slade out-duelled the Bok centres ball-in-hand last November. No surprise he is productive now. It's a common thing, unfortunately. Saffy and Mikey can't find a scrap of evidence to defend Kriel, or Damian for that matter - he who was comprehensively outplayed by Los Puma' s centre pair.
Yes and Slade's stats for that game were as follows:-
Slade 0/0 0 3/3/5 21 2 1 1 1 6/7 0/0 0 0/And Kriel's was as follows:-
Kriel 0/0 0 1/1/4 30 0 2 0 0 2/0 0/0 0 0/0And De Allende's were as follows:-
de Allende 0/0 0 1/1/15 63 2 6 0 2 11/1 0/0 1 0/0Wonderful out duelling in evidence with a \n atrocious record by the famous Slade. Stary\t thinking - Silly Billy - before youw rite tripe on site, Maybe that is too much to expect from a BSter like you.
I uploaded Damian's game. Why don't you go find these decisive contributions. Why don't you begin with his stupid penalty which gave England the lead and swung the momentum of the game in England's favour. From there the Poms ran the Boks ragged.
No not raw data - BSter Dunce, just countering the silly remarks made by he even the greater dunce Silly Billy.
Mozart
You really are a remarkable person with a deep hatred of some SA players. You came up with a string of centers from other countries that would make mincemeat of especially Kriel and De Allende and I can just name a few:-
Bausteraud, Kuridrani, Kerevi, Slade and now Johnson.
That your forecast did not work out as prophesized by you never hit home. Johnsoin is not even the first choice Scotland center - he came in because of injuries to Horne and Jones. Not sure you will ever see him in tests again.
So keep it up - it is always nice to see jokes and you are an expert in that when it coes to rugby issues, ,
By the way and p lease provide the names of the 11 test centers ahead of Kriel on the list of outside centers that you claim are factual.
I never mentioned Johnson. Ever. Kuridrani tortured Damian. Bastaraud dominated both. Go watch the video.
A hit to the nose and Mikey is down for the count.
When dimness when? And be careful Mozasart and Pakie was caught out misrepresenting things in the past.
