FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  SA Players of the week - Super 15 - Round 3

SA Players of the week - Super 15 - Round 3

Started by clevermike12 REPLIES106 VIEWS· 02 Mar 2015, 14:43
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Mar 2015, 14:43
#1
02 Mar 2015, 14:43#1

If I have to select a team based on performances this past weekend - it would look like this:-


15   Willie le Roux

14   Ruan Combrinck

13   Francois Venter

12   Damian de Allende

11   Francois Hougaard

10   Handre Pollard

 9    Cobus Reinach

 8    Warren Whitely

 7    Pieter Labushagne

 6    Jaco Kriel

 5    Pieter-Steph du Toit

 4    Franco Mostert

 3    Frans Malherbe

 2    Adriaan Strauss

 1    Steven Kitshoff


There was not much to choose between Willie le Roux and Jesse Kriel - but Le Roux was massive against the Blues.


At 14 I had to choose between Johnny Kotze and Ruan Combrinck - Hard choice, but I think Combrinck took it by the thinnest of margins


At 13 - Francois Venter was the key to frustrate the Blues backline attacks and he had a very good defensive game.  None of the 13's showed much in attacking play - none was better than Venter - so he is my choice for the week.


Vermeulen had a very quiet game - same as the previous week - so Whiteley was the obvious choice.


The decision between Labuschagne and Bothma was slight.   Labuschagne is a better ball protector and recoverer of balls and substantially superior in defense - while Bothma caught the eye carrying balls.  On an all-round basis Labuschagne is the better player.


I rarely would pick a bench player - but Malherbe was so superior to all the other SA props that I made an exception to the rule.   Marcell v an der Merwe also caught the eye - but he was defense and scrumming wise not on par with Malherbe.  Mention to be made that the first two scrums of Malherbe led to penalties for the Stormers.    

SH
ShezzaPro2,471 posts
02 Mar 2015, 15:38
#2
02 Mar 2015, 15:38#2
15. Le Roux14. Hendricks13. Venter12. De Allende11. Hougaard10. Pollard9. Pretorius 8. Kankowski7. Labuschagne 6. Kriel5. PSDT4. Mostert3. Coenie2. Strauss1. Kitshoff
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Mar 2015, 16:58
#3
02 Mar 2015, 16:58#3

No, that's not it

 

15. Kriel

14. Hendricks

13. JJ

12. Serfontein

11. Hougaard

10. Pollard

9. Groom

1. Kitshoff

2. Strauss

3. Coenie

4. du Plessis

5. PSDT

6. Kriel

7. Labs

8. Vermeulen

SH
ShezzaPro2,471 posts
02 Mar 2015, 17:13
#4
02 Mar 2015, 17:13#4
Pretorius was better than Groom, JJ did nothing and Du Plessis was nowhere near as good as Mostert. 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Mar 2015, 17:31
#5
02 Mar 2015, 17:31#5
 Dave
I know your automatc choice at 13 will always be Engelbrecht - but what exactly did he do in the Sharks match - being up against the useless Murray - to give him preference in this case.   I could not find anything - while Venter was up against top class players - Engelkbrecht was up against the weakest possible player and he did squat.
Serfontein better than de Allende - not a chance of that.  De Allende was MOM of the game against the Lions - end of story.
Groom and Reinach - very little to choose - but I think that Reinach just have the edge here.
I always follow Vermeulen - but he did not do enough to be selected ahead of Whiteley Whiteley was everywhere and he made double the number of tackles Vermeulen made. 
I do like Du Plessis - but to my mind there was little to choose between him and Mostert.  However, I am prepared to give in on that one.
Coenie was firm in scrumming - but not better in the scrumming compared to Malherbe.  Even though Malherbe had half the game time that Coenie had - he almost matched Coenie in the number of tackles made.   What impressed me was the way he took the Lions - a top scrumming outfit - apart when he came onto the field.           
SH
ShezzaPro2,471 posts
02 Mar 2015, 17:49
#6
02 Mar 2015, 17:49#6
Malherbe didn't scrum against Schalk van der Merwe and his replacement, Fourie, isn't the best. Coenie didn't play the full 80 and played against an AB in Woodcock. Reinach made loads of mistakes, Pretorius was much better.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Mar 2015, 17:51
#7
02 Mar 2015, 17:51#7

There was not much in it at 13, Frans Venter was certainly no better than JJ

 

Jan was better than de Allende

 

Coenie was far better than Malherbe

 

Vermeulen was much better than Whitely as was Kankan

 

Nope Groom wins it

 

My choices stand - end of  

SH
ShezzaPro2,471 posts
02 Mar 2015, 17:56
#8
02 Mar 2015, 17:56#8
 Groom was no where near as good as Pretorius.
JJ is becoming like De Jong, weak and unnoticeable.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Mar 2015, 18:34
#9
02 Mar 2015, 18:34#9

Your take on JJ is becoming more childish by the week....grow up

 

Groom was the best 9 on display  

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
02 Mar 2015, 18:34
#10
02 Mar 2015, 18:34#10
 JJ you have to be kidding ....he has about negative 60 metres for the game.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Mar 2015, 18:36
#11
02 Mar 2015, 18:36#11
Crap, he was solid, had little ball.....never got turned over as useless de Jongh did twice ......was better than Mapoe, Venter and Murray on the day - FACT 
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
02 Mar 2015, 18:58
#12
02 Mar 2015, 18:58#12
Nine metres gained....two penalties conceded. Figure them at 35 metres each. His contribution negative 60 metres. He has started making some pretty border line dirty tackles as well. 
kriel  should be moved to 13
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Mar 2015, 19:07
#13
02 Mar 2015, 19:07#13
JJ is doing just fine at 13....was the best 13 in SA on the day  
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news