FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  SA Refs up to their old tricks again in the Republic

SA Refs up to their old tricks again in the Republic

Started by hakwa68 REPLIES1,403 VIEWS· 19 May 2019, 13:11
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
19 May 2019, 13:11
#1
19 May 2019, 13:11#1

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/112831616/super-rugby-aaron-mauger-questions-local-referee-as-highlanders-get-caned.



PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 May 2019, 13:30
#2
19 May 2019, 13:30#2

It swings in roundabouts...mate

Edit: Please refer to last weekend's Jags game for clarity.

SE
SebPro2,680 posts
19 May 2019, 13:33
#3
19 May 2019, 13:33#3

I'm loathe to made a habit of criticising refs no matter where they stem from because I feel generally they do a good job and it is not easy...in fact it is a very hard and thankless task.

However,the stats in the Lions/Landers are indeed a matter of concern...it does not add up.

I watched the Stormers/Crusaders match only and I felt that that intervention by Marius Jonker calling a forward pass was indeed incorrect.

It was not forward as it left the passers hand but tended to drift forward. It might be contraversal but I'm not going to suggest that it was a "crooked" call but nevertheless a bad one. .

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 May 2019, 13:40
#4
19 May 2019, 13:40#4

Seb

At least the fake forward pass call didn't cost them a WC ;)

SE
SebPro2,680 posts
19 May 2019, 13:55
#5
19 May 2019, 13:55#5
LOL Plum, I surmise you are referring to Wayne Barnes, AB/France quarters in 2007?
Anyway a game win should not rest on these issues...if you are going to win, win well and cast out any suspicion ?


sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,251 posts
19 May 2019, 13:57
#6
19 May 2019, 13:57#6

There should not be local referees. Anytime a wrong decision is made, it appears as though there is cheating. 


SE
SebPro2,680 posts
19 May 2019, 13:59
#7
19 May 2019, 13:59#7
LOL Plum, I surmise you are referring to Wayne Barnes, AB/France quarters in 2007?
Anyway a game win should not rest on these issues...if you are going to win, win well and cast out any suspicion ?
But a 46-6 penalty call ratio is ridiculous and seriously wrong...should indeed be investigated.


PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 May 2019, 14:10
#8
19 May 2019, 14:10#8

I'm all for NH refs here and SH going north.

SE
SebPro2,680 posts
19 May 2019, 14:20
#9
19 May 2019, 14:20#9

Absolutely, I've always said that...it will give results that give credibility to Super Rugby and competitions in Europe.

Furthermore it will help SH and NH national teams get used to refs from both sides of the RWC competitors and understand what goes and what doesn't in complicated decisions.

Nobody likes winning when the ref helps...it just doe not feel good inside???

Poor AB's they have been on both situations and yeah so has SA but it was not a NH ref that was the demon.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
19 May 2019, 15:19
#10
19 May 2019, 15:19#10

Anytime a marginal decision goes against them the kiwis scream blue murder and they will usually quote the Wayne Barnes debacle.

They of course will gloss over endless amount of wrong calls favouring their unscrupulous players who are schooled on how to cheat.

All this has led to comments around the world about the kiwis being rugby cheats. Think of course of their captain Mccheat as he was universally known. Or that gas bag Sean fitzpatrick who was as bent as they came. Their ref of the year was the now infamous Bryce Lawrence. Recall how the French captain after that RWC finals said the ref didn't want them to win - how obviously true. Again and again kiwi cheating has been documented on this forum with the stock reply being look at the scoreboard.




CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
19 May 2019, 15:31
#11
19 May 2019, 15:31#11

Hakwa

The Highlanders were excessively lucky the previous week when playing the Jaguares,   The latter team was playing 19 players - the 15 on the field plus the ref, the line judges and the TW monitor.  So why the sudden complaint this week - when that wreck of a team,  the Highlanders - got beaten?        

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
19 May 2019, 16:01
#12
19 May 2019, 16:01#12

       Hint Mike                                             

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
19 May 2019, 16:46
#13
19 May 2019, 16:46#13
Actually I thought in both instances the NZ teams got a few rough calls....but not the forward pass. It was a medium length pass that was received two or three paces ahead of where it was released. The hands argument is almost impossible to judge....totally subjective. If your hands are going back relative to your body, but the body is open relative to the sideline......what's the answer? The forward pass needs a better test.
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,251 posts
19 May 2019, 17:14
#14
19 May 2019, 17:14#14
If a rugby ball had a digital chip that could detect when a ball was released and compared to when caught and then to the touchline- perhaps it could be made 100% what a forward pass ruling is.
However, New Zealand would most likely find a way to cheat the system  
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
19 May 2019, 17:26
#15
19 May 2019, 17:26#15
This ball left the passer's hands exactly on the half way line....and was caught three paces inside the half. It comes down to the point I made above....his hands may have gone back relative to his body, but the line of his shoulders was wide open when he released it. It's an impossible rule to ref. Nothing wrong with the strict old rule of the pass not going forward relative to the field....players and support runners would have to adapt. Lots of pop passes also go forward. There was a blatant example in the move before this with Senatla and company down the right wing.
BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
19 May 2019, 18:40
#16
19 May 2019, 18:40#16
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
19 May 2019, 20:06
#17
19 May 2019, 20:06#17
Technology can solve this conundrum.
We'd need overhead cameras that could that could transmit data as to the speed of the runner and the trajectory of the pass. An overlay could then be projected showing the trajectory of what would be a flat pass in that situation and if the real ball is ahead of the simulated ball then it's a forward pass.
SE
SebPro2,680 posts
19 May 2019, 21:07
#18
19 May 2019, 21:07#18

I feel the nitty/picky decisions should always favour the attacking side especially when it's crucial...initiative and spirit of the law should come in to play rather than the letter but (warning) never abused. That's why the integrity of the decision should be respected and not criticised...the positive should dominate the negative as long as it is not abused.

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 May 2019, 21:11
#19
19 May 2019, 21:11#19

100% Behind ball tracking too Rooi. I'd combine that with the tracking chips already carried by players.

Could solve lots of issues. 

The four trained professional refs tasked with adjudication of matches are, too often for my liking, not up to the task. Every season, every week, every competition, shit game changing calls appear to be inescapable. 

Compare Willie getting binned for a clear attempt to catch the ball to yesterday's game where an intentional knockdown on the try line results in nothing. 

I don't watch rugby to learn about how some twat interprets the rules. 

Refs are admin staff, nothing more. Hopefully automation replaces them sooner rather than later.

Edit: Just something extra. Game consoles have for the last decade come with cameras that interpreted feeds of player motion. No chips or special gear required. 

That type of system can easily be made use of to track every player on the field. That crucial data puts you right at the point where you could automate tons of adjudication.

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
19 May 2019, 21:16
#20
19 May 2019, 21:16#20
Plum, if you're watching the current US PGA or if you watched any of the IPL you'll know how much information one can get from gathering data and projecting where the ball would have gone. The technology is not perfect but it's pretty darned close and a lot better than some oke watching the same thing we're seeing on TV and giving his opinion.
I don't think Braydon Ennor's pass was forward and the try should have stood. Decent technology would have proved me right . . . instead we have the word of someone who saw the exact same thing we all saw and decided it was "compelling evidence" of a forward pass. Absolute rubbish . . . and frankly inexcusable in today's world.
Having said that, good luck getting automation to decide if a player is supporting his own weight or making a second movement or causing the scrum to go up or calling advantage over or any of the other complex and variable decisions a ref has to make . . . usually to derision from couch-watchers like you who think you're better qualified and/or less biased.

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 May 2019, 21:20
#21
19 May 2019, 21:20#21

Honestly, I didn't see the pass, was a bit "happy" at that point already. Saw the try, next thing I knew it had been reversed. Did watch the rest of the game though.

JL Du Plessis is coming back nicely. I rate that chap.

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
19 May 2019, 21:22
#22
19 May 2019, 21:22#22
Well I think Jean-Luc du Plessis is crap. A hopelessly overrated and slow little chap who will never rise above bog ordinary.
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 May 2019, 21:30
#23
19 May 2019, 21:30#23

 Rooi

See my edit above.

JL was awesome before his injury. And he looks like he's getting back there. A bit slowly, but he is moving forward.

For me, he's got the goods. 

What do the Stormers fans think of him, I wonder?

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
19 May 2019, 21:32
#24
19 May 2019, 21:32#24
"What do the Stormers fans think of him, I wonder?"
Well don't ask me . . . but I suspect a lot of them have bought into all the usual WP hype about him being some kind of future superstar just because his dad could play a bit.
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 May 2019, 21:44
#25
19 May 2019, 21:44#25

Honestly, I've not seen him hyped much. Not saying that he isn't hyped, just that I've not really seen it.

I rate him based on what I've seen. Especially prior to his injury.

SE
SebPro2,680 posts
19 May 2019, 22:02
#26
19 May 2019, 22:02#26

Well the way I see it we don't want a game played by human beings being completely dominated by devices and technology...it's a human game by human beings and adjudicated by human beings not a computer game...that would sterilise it. Golf is the same...I once played a bad shot, it went into the rough, hit a tree and bounced on to the green. It's all in the game and makes it interesting which I believe is the essence of sport. Ofcourse it can happen the other way round but a sportsman excepts it. I once recall Gary Player playing an impossible bunker shot, he was always a master of these predicaments but this time he did not get it right...it clipped the top of the bunker went right up in the air did a spin or two and rolled into the hole. A bystander remarked : "what luck!" Gary turned to the chirper and said : "My friend, as in this game as in life the harder you practise the luckier you get!"

There will always be the controversy's that happen, ref's indiscretions are part of the risk...true sportsmen take the rough with the smooth.

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
19 May 2019, 22:48
#27
19 May 2019, 22:48#27
Sure we could add yet another bit of technology to get round a rule which was perfectly clear....until we confused it with the silly forward out of the hands rule. And it was a blatant forward pass. Ennor had been checked by JJ's tackle attempt.....he then ran slightly sideways from a near standing start for about 10 metres before he passed. He was well short of full pace....so drift should have been accordingly less. The player next to him checked his stride. Then the pass thrown exactly on the 10 metre line, from inside the 15m lineout line, went almost exactly 10 metres through the air before Reece caught it, three strides beyond the 10metre line and well in front of him, reaching. Passes travelling 10 metres dont go 3 three plus metres forward from a player at way less than full pace. Otherwise a 15 metre pass at full pace would be legal even if it travelled 6 metres forward. It was a clear cut forward pass.
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
19 May 2019, 23:23
#28
19 May 2019, 23:23#28

Plum, I like JL but think he will always be injury prone because he is rathers small...

Ja Rooi, his dad could play a bit, so I was hoping he could be almost as good. Not bad, but I can't see him being an all time Bok great....same for his cousin.

BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
19 May 2019, 23:25
#29
19 May 2019, 23:25#29

Here's the video of Reece's great TRY ..Why the Crusties did'nt pass the ball to him more is the question...

Obviously a Try stuff.co.nz >

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
19 May 2019, 23:29
#30
19 May 2019, 23:29#30
Probably because he was AHEAD of the passer most of the time. No try....not even close.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
19 May 2019, 23:53
#32
19 May 2019, 23:53#32
A pass from a player at half pace that goes 3 plus metres forward over 10 metres is forward...case closed.
BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
20 May 2019, 04:47
#33
20 May 2019, 04:47#33


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
20 May 2019, 04:54
#34
20 May 2019, 04:54#34
No not in a NZ educational institution....luckily.
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
20 May 2019, 07:09
#35
20 May 2019, 07:09#35

Seb

How much worse is cricket now that the vast majority of bad calls have been taken out of the game?

For me, it's way better. Even if there is still the very occasional bad call. 

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
20 May 2019, 08:00
#36
20 May 2019, 08:00#36

Hakwazeeeee and Plum have so much in common.

Both bitch about the ref continuously.

They hate each other's country ... and people.

Buggery is an acceptable way of life for both of them ... and both partake in it frequently.

So well suited.

  



PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
20 May 2019, 08:29
#37
20 May 2019, 08:29#37

Awe did mommy's lil sad fucker wake up on the wrong side of the tracks this morning?

Poor chap. 

Have a cookie. You'll feel right as rain in no time.

MO
MoonroverPro1,973 posts
20 May 2019, 10:15
#38
20 May 2019, 10:15#38

In fast motion the pass looked good,flat ,as the camera was right in line.We u sually get it wrong because we discount the angles of the camera as a spectator.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
20 May 2019, 11:41
#39
20 May 2019, 11:41#39

One fervently hopes ou hacked waugh isn't causing unnecessary controversy! 

 As Moz explains it was obviously forward.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
20 May 2019, 12:36
#40
20 May 2019, 12:36#40

There is a problem in rugby - for many years NZ has ruled the rugby world, but other countries are slowly going forward in development of their own game,   Defeats regarded as impossible  are now happening occasionally.

Just like the team the NZ refs set the tone when it comes to refereeing decisions,   The referees are learning the finer tricks of refereeing from them as well.   Now that the same methods used by NZ refs in the past being applied to them at present it is an unhappy situation for the NZ fans and they moan about it,

What about the ancient idiom - Those living in glass houses should not throw stones?     .       

↓ LOAD MORE (page 2 of 2)

More from Rugby

More news