15. Willie 14. Rhule 13. de Allende 12. Serfontein 11. Kolbe 10. Pollard 9. de Klerk 1. Kitshoff 2. Strauss 3. Coenie 4. du Plessis 5. PSDT 6. Kriel 7. Labascagne 8. Vermeulen
Captain30,741 posts
08 Mar 2015, 23:17
#1
08 Mar 2015, 23:17#1
SA team of the week
Started by Saffolk 56 REPLIES396 VIEWS· 08 Mar 2015, 23:17
Coach57,555 posts
09 Mar 2015, 00:01
#2
09 Mar 2015, 00:01#2
Da\ve cannot really fault your selection. There w as no outstanding 13 and both De Allende and Serfonetin had excellent matches.
Pro2,471 posts
09 Mar 2015, 00:29
#3
09 Mar 2015, 00:29#3
That's not the point of TOTY's, each player has to contest against others in the same position no matter how good they were.
Captain30,741 posts
09 Mar 2015, 12:21
#4
09 Mar 2015, 12:21#4
Don't give a toss what you think the point is......my team is selected end of
Pro2,471 posts
09 Mar 2015, 13:20
#5
09 Mar 2015, 13:20#5
You're such a keyboard warrior.
Captain30,741 posts
09 Mar 2015, 13:50
#6
09 Mar 2015, 13:50#6
Oh goodness......not this crap again.....my invitation is always open for you to come pay me a visit in sunny Suffolk to test that warrior keyboard status.
Pro2,471 posts
09 Mar 2015, 14:34
#7
09 Mar 2015, 14:34#7
This again? I think you're confusing me for someone else. This is the first time I've taken you up on this. If you're like this in person, it just just means you're a knob in the virtual world and the real world, well done.
Captain30,741 posts
09 Mar 2015, 15:01
#8
09 Mar 2015, 15:01#8
Look here knob, do you really think I give a flying toss about what a nobody like you thinks of me.....and for the record, the feeling is mutual......I think the same of you, but who gives a shit
Piss off you waste of space......an ignorant waste of space at that
Coach57,555 posts
09 Mar 2015, 15:15
#9
09 Mar 2015, 15:15#9
Dave and Shezza
Save your energy - Mozart has not commented on this item yet and you knoiw what to expect of him.
Save your energy - Mozart has not commented on this item yet and you knoiw what to expect of him.
Captain40,032 posts
09 Mar 2015, 15:35
#10
09 Mar 2015, 15:35#10
I think ou snapster has C heaser confused with Boklogic!!! One too many!
Captain18,117 posts
09 Mar 2015, 16:09
#11
09 Mar 2015, 16:09#11
Handre Pollard's performance must go down as one of the best performances by any South African player in the last few seasons.
Pro2,471 posts
09 Mar 2015, 16:10
#12
09 Mar 2015, 16:10#12
Give it a rest you conceited loser, learn to respect others if you don't want people to take you to task over your snobbery.
Captain30,741 posts
09 Mar 2015, 16:21
#13
09 Mar 2015, 16:21#13
What part of piss off did you not comprehend you idiot and while you are about, do yourself a favour and look up the word 'snobbery'
What an absolute dunce
Captain30,741 posts
09 Mar 2015, 16:22
#14
09 Mar 2015, 16:22#14
Agreed Rooi, he was very good confirming what an all-round threat he is.
Meyer's treatment of him on the EOYT confirms just how average a coach he is
Captain26,388 posts
09 Mar 2015, 17:42
#15
09 Mar 2015, 17:42#15
I'll go for Kriel at 15 and Koch at 3. Swap De Alende to 12...Jan 13. Rest looks good.
PS, Eben to claim no4 sooner rather than later but not nearly there yet.
PS, Eben to claim no4 sooner rather than later but not nearly there yet.
Captain40,032 posts
09 Mar 2015, 17:50
#16
09 Mar 2015, 17:50#16
The back three of Wille, Kolbe and Rhule look to flimsy to me.Snapster I thought Mallet and I told all the oaks, you inlcuded, that Kolbe must go to scrummie!!!
Draad if Kriel goes to 15 a possiblity then put Willie on the wing.
Coenie was tremendous in the tight lose so maybe he pips Koch?
Snapsters loose trio is not bad for a running game.I though Kriel at 6 for the Lions had a quiet game
Draad if Kriel goes to 15 a possiblity then put Willie on the wing.
Coenie was tremendous in the tight lose so maybe he pips Koch?
Snapsters loose trio is not bad for a running game.I though Kriel at 6 for the Lions had a quiet game
Pro2,471 posts
09 Mar 2015, 17:51
#17
09 Mar 2015, 17:51#17
You need to be re-educated if you can't tell how you're a snob.
Captain26,388 posts
09 Mar 2015, 17:55
#18
09 Mar 2015, 17:55#18
Beenz, I'm only talking of this past week. Kriel still makes too much errors. Not yet a bok. Willie had a crap game and does not deserve a spot in the TOTW.
Captain40,032 posts
09 Mar 2015, 18:16
#19
09 Mar 2015, 18:16#19
Is Rhule a Bok? Tipped by snapster far, far too early in the day of course he is looking a bit better physically these days .
Captain26,388 posts
09 Mar 2015, 18:24
#20
09 Mar 2015, 18:24#20
Beenz, this is not a bok team, but Rhule might well be challenging JP by RC time. JP seems a bit off lately....he does play for the wee guppies, so might look better in a proper team.
Captain30,741 posts
09 Mar 2015, 18:35
#21
09 Mar 2015, 18:35#21
As I said look the word up you ignorant prick
Captain30,741 posts
09 Mar 2015, 18:35
#22
09 Mar 2015, 18:35#22
Beenkop, get a grip your obsession with size is tiresome.....change the fucking record you fool
Captain30,741 posts
09 Mar 2015, 18:37
#23
09 Mar 2015, 18:37#23
Blikkies - no way in hell does Koch come in for Coenie, Coenie was one of the players of the weekend.
I'd be happy with Kriel at 15
Nope Jan at 12, de Allende at 13
Captain40,032 posts
09 Mar 2015, 18:51
#24
09 Mar 2015, 18:51#24
collectively too small. Wake up snapster your ignorance is showing again!By the way wee Kolisi was the poorest of the Stormers forwards by some way. Bwahahahahahaha Only way he will p lay is via injuries!
Carr to his credit was better.
Carr to his credit was better.
Captain30,741 posts
09 Mar 2015, 18:55
#25
09 Mar 2015, 18:55#25
Bullshit Kolisi had a good game you ignorant prick
I doubt you know what collective means
Pro1,870 posts
09 Mar 2015, 19:22
#26
09 Mar 2015, 19:22#26
Agree with the forwards.
Backs, there are too many out of their position this week.
12 - definitely De Allende. Outplayed Serfontein and did it against far better opposition
13 - no one really stepping up, but Engelbrecht had a decent game and would be my pick. Nice quick pass for the try, showing physicality in the tackle. Seems to have stepped it up in aggression from last year. Stepped badly by Hendricks though but he has one of the best steps in the business.
11 - Hougaard. I know you disagree Saff but IMO he has his most productive outings on the wing. Was the same last year when he played there a few times.
15 - For me Willie had far too many turnovers and nothing really influential. I was only watching the game with half an eye so could have missed something. I thought Kolbe, Marais and Kriel all played better...... with Kolbe getting my pick
Backs, there are too many out of their position this week.
12 - definitely De Allende. Outplayed Serfontein and did it against far better opposition
13 - no one really stepping up, but Engelbrecht had a decent game and would be my pick. Nice quick pass for the try, showing physicality in the tackle. Seems to have stepped it up in aggression from last year. Stepped badly by Hendricks though but he has one of the best steps in the business.
11 - Hougaard. I know you disagree Saff but IMO he has his most productive outings on the wing. Was the same last year when he played there a few times.
15 - For me Willie had far too many turnovers and nothing really influential. I was only watching the game with half an eye so could have missed something. I thought Kolbe, Marais and Kriel all played better...... with Kolbe getting my pick
Captain30,741 posts
09 Mar 2015, 19:27
#27
09 Mar 2015, 19:27#27
Oi, yeah I thought JJ was the best of the 13's......but the two best centres were Jan and de Allende and I'd have no issue moving de Allende to 13.
Pro2,471 posts
09 Mar 2015, 19:39
#28
09 Mar 2015, 19:39#28
I don't need to look the word up, I know what it means. You're being a snob by calling others 'nobodies'. Idiot.
Captain30,741 posts
10 Mar 2015, 00:09
#29
10 Mar 2015, 00:09#29
Wow are you university educated? I somehow doubt it
Pro2,471 posts
10 Mar 2015, 00:24
#30
10 Mar 2015, 00:24#30
And that's all you've got to say. I've had a better education than you, apparently you're a lawyer and you can't argue/debate very well.
Captain30,741 posts
10 Mar 2015, 00:33
#31
10 Mar 2015, 00:33#31
Oh wow are you the measure when it comes to arguing or debating......Geez do you know how stupid you generally come across. With due respect I always took you for a woman talking rugby.
What is a so called lawyer?
What is a so called lawyer?
Pro2,471 posts
10 Mar 2015, 00:51
#32
10 Mar 2015, 00:51#32
Do you call the judge an "ignorant waste of space" when your client is prosecuted?
Hougaard SA's best 9 and JJ our best 13, say's a lot about your 'rugby knowledge'...
Hougaard SA's best 9 and JJ our best 13, say's a lot about your 'rugby knowledge'...
Captain30,741 posts
10 Mar 2015, 01:00
#33
10 Mar 2015, 01:00#33
One certainty is that I know a whole lot more about rugby than you.
So what is a so called lawyer wise man?
Who said I had anything to do with a judge?
So what is a so called lawyer wise man?
Who said I had anything to do with a judge?
Pro2,471 posts
10 Mar 2015, 01:15
#34
10 Mar 2015, 01:15#34
No you don't. You're more loud mouthed about what you know about rugby compared to me but you certainly don't know more.
I'm failing to follow what your getting at about lawyers, you said before that you were a lawyer. Which by your comments now mean that you aren't anymore, most likely got the sack?
I'm failing to follow what your getting at about lawyers, you said before that you were a lawyer. Which by your comments now mean that you aren't anymore, most likely got the sack?
Captain30,741 posts
10 Mar 2015, 01:22
#35
10 Mar 2015, 01:22#35
Your last paragraph confirms just how profoundly stupid you are. Is English your second language?
Pro2,471 posts
10 Mar 2015, 01:43
#36
10 Mar 2015, 01:43#36
It is, is it yours?
I'm guessing this tangent has stemmed from the fact I used the term lawyer instead of solicitor, if so then I find you extremely petty, but what can I come to expect from you? After all, if someone disagree's with you then you'll call them every name under the sun, unpleasant .
I'm guessing this tangent has stemmed from the fact I used the term lawyer instead of solicitor, if so then I find you extremely petty, but what can I come to expect from you? After all, if someone disagree's with you then you'll call them every name under the sun, unpleasant .
Captain30,741 posts
10 Mar 2015, 01:49
#37
10 Mar 2015, 01:49#37
Nope solicitor vs lawyer has nothing to do with it. I asked you a simple question bozo what is a so called lawyer....should I rephrase that in your first language whatever that may be huh?
Pro2,580 posts
10 Mar 2015, 01:58
#38
10 Mar 2015, 01:58#38
My SA team of the weekend.
15. Kriel 14. Rhule 13. De Allende 12. F Steyn (He did some bad things but I think he looked solid, don't shoot me Mike!) 11. Kolbe 10. Pollard (the kids the next DC) 9. De Klerk 8. Vermulen 7. Laubchange 6. Whitely 5. Du Toit 4. Du Pleesi 3. Ouestahazen 2. Strauss 1. Voch
15. Kriel 14. Rhule 13. De Allende 12. F Steyn (He did some bad things but I think he looked solid, don't shoot me Mike!) 11. Kolbe 10. Pollard (the kids the next DC) 9. De Klerk 8. Vermulen 7. Laubchange 6. Whitely 5. Du Toit 4. Du Pleesi 3. Ouestahazen 2. Strauss 1. Voch
Pro2,471 posts
10 Mar 2015, 02:07
#39
10 Mar 2015, 02:07#39
Are you having a laugh, you can't be that stupid? I'm not going to answer you're question because it's below me.
Captain30,741 posts
10 Mar 2015, 17:13
#40
10 Mar 2015, 17:13#40
Hey dunce what is 'you're'............bwhaaahaaaaa
Say no more, the only thing that is below you is your brain.......not that I think you have one
Classic stuff!!
↓ LOAD MORE (page 2 of 2)
