Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu Injuries playing against the Sharks

Please refer to the folowing report:-

Stormers and Springboks prodigy Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu has received a positive update after his latest injury against the Sharks at the weekend.

Three games in a row the breakthrough star has failed to reach half-time in his return from a knee injury.

The first incident was a concussion against the Sharks in the early part of the festive period. He then recovered from that knock to run out against the Lions, but a massive hit from Asenathi Ntlabakanye resulted in a hip pointer injury.

Fortunately, there was no long-term damage and Feinberg-Mngomezulu was named to play in the return fixture against the Sharks - only for the breakout star to damage his collarbone in the opening play of the game. He would soldier on until just before half-time but was eventually hauled off.

Thankfully, reports suggest the Stormers man has damage to his sternoclavicular joint but there is evidence of a fracture, meaning that only rest is required.

Understandably both Feinberg-Mngomezulu and fans alike have been left frustrated by the run of injuries as the playmaker is seen as one of the brightest young flyhalves in South Africa.

However, despite the starlet openly wanting to play flyhalf, he is a victim of his own skill-set with the Stormers using him at 12 to accommodate Manie Libbok. Some fear his recent run of injuries is linked to the extra contact in the midfield channel.

The 22-year-old showed just how important he can be for South African rugby this season after putting in some impressive performances off the bench against Ireland in the mid-year series before Rassie Erasmus handed him the No 10 shirt against the Wallabies and the All Blacks.

While he missed the latter part of the Test season through injury, his mark had been made, with many viewing him as the ideal flyhalf to run Tony Brown's new Springbok attack. There are options elsewhere - particularly in an-form Handre Pollard - but there's no doubt many see Feinberg-Mngomezulu as the future -  provided he can get the injuries under control.

The Stormers' next clash is against Sale Sharks where the Cape side must win to stay in the Champions Cup.

Looking at all three injuries Sacha suffered came from playing the man and not the ball.    In the case of the first Sharks inury Nykane hit him with the head agsinst Sacha head - clear on the TV - but not penalized during the match.   In the Lions and Second Sharks atch it was clear that the Sharks played a game that eventually took out both Sacha and Jantjies out of the game by quetionable play.   In the Lions and Sharks game palyers fell on top of Shaka and hit him in the leg by the player who fell on him.   In the  Sharks case that caused the injury as well. 

Ubn fortunately for the Sharks the Stormers followed their example and a player fell onm top of Eserhuizen and e went off as well.   Falling on top of players instead of starting a  proper break-down recovery and retention or overturning position.   It remais at best a offense that should be penalized and gettig away with it is immature and dangerous.   So it is time to penalize payers doing that should be penlazied and even yello carded.    Yje games can be hard - but that should exclude prevention of dangerous play.   

        .    

Thankfully, reports suggest the Stormers man has damage to his sternoclavicular joint but there is evidence of a fracture, meaning that only rest is required.

I hope it's not a journalist writing tripe like this.

I do not myself know what really happened - but e was injred ina ssituation was resulted from irresponsible and dangeros cnduct in all three cases.   The Sharks seems to want certain players of th e field and their conduct lok like fangerous and deliberate unacceptable dirty play.   In the end the Stormers folloed the example and two f the  Sharks players ended up leaving the field as well necause teh S tormer started playing te sme game as the  Sharks did.

That is whyI regard the match as an atrocious match that should never be repeated,   If they try that stunt in their upcoming match against Toulouse,  they would lose by 42+ points.   

By the way I heard a number of opinions as to the anture of the injury of Sacha on Saurday and in both the description was nonsense - but I thin the doctors will decide when and where he will play again.    Where I do agree is that  Sacha should play at flyalf where he will be able to play a diffrenct game than at center.   where he runs into frwards because of shit decisinmaking of the flyhalf and that s not hat sould happen.   Libbok is upershit and not a flyhalf's arse. .              .       ,   

The Sharks are not know as a sporting side Mike. 

Burma van Zyl the former bulls coach used to tell Naas Botha not to tackle and told his forwards to cover for Nass. Botha was far too valuable a player, a match winner, and had to be protected as much as possible.

To mevl Sascha must play fly half and some strategy should be worked out to limit him getting too physically involved. 

Nasty sides like the Sharks, who don't see the bigger picture,  are out to get him. Sascha is young and will toughen up in time. Give him some breathing space. 

What did the Sharks do to Sacha that could be termed as "out to get him"?

"The naughty Sharks play too rough for us.", squeal the tearful WP tranny boys, "it's just not fair!"

LMAO!

Baboon-ou was probably too busy leering over the WP dancing boys to watch much of the game.

Hey Rooitwit how about the Sharks change their playing gear. They should Reay be wearing very tight pink tights. 

Use your persuasive talents Rooitwit, match the Sharks playing gear to their inclinations.

The Sharks got taught a lesson. Little  Luc Du Plessis sorted them out. 

Hahahahahahahahahaha. 

Very average trolling, Beeno Sacha should be left to recover properly, I think he's being pushed into playing by either pretending to be in better shape than he is or by ignorance from the staff. Maybe both. And yes, at flyhalf which is where he will serve for the Boks.

 Rooidoos

Thee is a difference beteeen playing hard rugb and playing dirty rugby and that difference is byond your comprehension.    

Go on then ou Maaik, tell us the play that was dirty rather than hard.