Sharks vs Crusaders - live banter

@beeno,

"Cloudy this is not normal sharks rugby. Travel bug effect is very obvious."
"If ever the travel factor effect was ever illustrated it was today."

bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
excuses, excuses and more excuses.
when are you going to recognize something to the NZ rugby and quit the excuses, excuses and more excuses ?

 Brycy you reckon Walshie pays the water boy to lace his drink bottle with something special I was wondering about those late penalties that sunk the Landers

 kbbs travel to SA and you would have been thumped even though travelling in that direction is not as severe a problem. The first match down under by a saffa side is always bad. Take away the travel factor and the sharks beat the crusties with 13 men!!! wahahahahahahahahaha
As Jake rightly says the comp it fatally flawed. Also bear in mind the crusties never played the Warts and also they got a RAW against the Stormers. Would the crustis have even made the fianl with those two losses?
Beeno endeavouring to keep kbbs from getting too delusional! 

 Beens, stop sharing Walshie's drink bottle

 @beeno,

" kbbs travel to SA and you would have been thumped even though travelling in that direction is not as severe a problem. The first match down under by a saffa side is always bad. Take away the travel factor and the sharks beat the crusties with 13 men!!! wahahahahahahahahaha
As Jake rightly says the comp it fatally flawed. Also bear in mind the crusties never played the Warts and also they got a RAW against the Stormers. Would the crustis have even made the fianl with those two losses?"


really pathetic

 if 2 months ago they didn't have any bug travel and they could beat the sadrs with 13 men, how is it possible that they have it now?
They flew with a different company? there was full moon? or did the oceanic tide influence?

excuses, excuses and more excuses

 Reality, reality, reality.Get the difference ab ass. Hey why am I talking to an ass Bwahahahahahhaha
Get over this hollow victory ab ass and watch the Warts/Brumbies game. You and ou brycy are drawing the wrong conclusions as per normal. If you think the sharks were playing anywhere near to their potential you are as daft as saSUE! 

 Also ab ass the Shaks beating the crusties with 13 men was NOT their first game on tour - hence travel was not a factor.getting a glimmer!

 Oh my Sharks, my Sharks, Who bewitched you in that Kiwi land?


 

 Hacked waaaugh I am sure you know far more about kiwi walshe's drink bottle than me.

Yes Ntanga it was as if they were bewtiched but it was in reality the dreaded travel bug. Sharks v ery lethargic and shows the difficulty re play off and travel. Bit of a farce really.
The kbbs are believing their own hype.

 saders in 2011 after being travelling all the season because of the earthquake, went to Newlands, clearly beat the stormers, went back to brisbane and lost to the reds by 5 after a hapless performance of lawrence who was afraid of seeming that he was favouring the NZ side.

They lost by 5 not by 32.

This has been a clear and deserved win. Recognize it

 It is not like you Beeno to come up with all these excuses ........on the other hand ........

 Hi Cloudy

 Ab ass who are the reds. REMEMBER HOW THE SHARKS TRAVELLED TO OZ WON, BACK TO SA won then were completely bushed when playing the Chiefs in nz. Think that is a level playing field - it's impossibly loaded.

Reality hacked waagh, reality.  

 Hasbeeno, as I predicted, Saders by plenty.If you want home advantage then you must always beat an average Stormers outfit!Most other teams can......

 owned again Beens by Moolaa

 Nope the Crusaders got a RAWs win over the  Stormers. The general consensus was the Stormers should have won that game. So only through RAWs did the crusaders make the second spot. Typical nz.
Got it hacked waaaugh ya micro wit!
I hear C ampo saying lambie should not have started at 10 due to lack of game time. Was my concern.

 Moooo la owned by Beeno. Nothing has changed oaks