Siya Kolisi will be the Springbok RWC 2019 captain . . .

Oh....so now UrineRooi want's everyone to get behind the poor apology of a Bok captain. No we don't, some of us choose to tolerate him. 

Where was UrineRooi's support for Jake White in 2007? Some will remember his vitriol before and even long after the Boks won that WC. He'd written off the Boks before they left the shores of SA and then unashamedly gave JW no credit by going onto say that the Boks had beaten nobodies.

Filthy hypocrite.

Well Moffie ... your criticism of Redneck's team was expected ... you tend to criticize everyone's team ... except of course DeepThroat's feeble attempts ... (he must give some incredible head) ... and then in turn you'll try to dazzle us with your elderly brigade of hasbeens and neverbeens.

No ... I would not select Pollard at 12. He's matured and become the best thing we've seen at 10 for more than a decade and that is exactly where I would leave him ... I've said so before ... weren't you paying attention? 

My choice at 12 would be Serfontein with Venter on his outside.

Willemse is a class act ... of that there's no doubt. Rassie should have given him a lot more time on the park. I would replace the overrated Willie Le Roux with him. He has a far better rugby brain than Silly Willy and isn't prone to the same level of stupidity.

Jean Luc Du Preez is a powerful blindside flank and has impressed at SR level. He too should have been given more of a chance to settle at 7 by Rassie. He didn't receive a fair shot at making the jersey his own.

Dan on the other hand isn't one that I'd include in the mix ... but then again ... who do we have that's compitent enough to take the 8 jersey? Duane Vermeulen? Haaaaahahahahahahahahaaaa!! NO THANK YOU!!

Maybe Marcell Coetzee should be brought in a little closer. I don't know ... the 8 jersey is till up for grabs. 

Pieter Steff Du Toit is our best forward by some way and has really been impressive at 7 ... unlike the pathetic attempt we saw from Duane "The Hasbeen" Vermeulen.

It's great to know we have someone of his caliber to call on if need be. I would rather see him at 5 though ... oh ... and I said that earlier too ... weren't you patting attention, Moffie? 

As for Kolisi ... Rassie has committed himself to the man and there is nothing we can do about it. I don't like Kolisi ... I have never likd him ... he is just as useless as Louw at 6 and totally clueless on how to lead a team.

He should be taken out back and shot at dawn as far as I'm concerned.

Oh ... I nearly forgot ... Poepol ... be so kind as to let us have your match 23.

Thanks a lot!!     

Denny

I differ from you iro one selection and that is Wilco Louw.   He under-performed as a Tighthead in tests this year and there are question marks as  to his fitness and total lack of performance outside o scrumming  - so I agree with Erasmus  as to Malherbe being a better starting option.   

As to Pollard - I would rather see him at 10 and Willemse at 12.  Pollard has a problem in  defending when playing at 12 and  Willemse in his junior years played either 10 or 12.   Mozart totally misinterpreted the issue of Willemse when he came on and according to him was out of position in one case, without regard to what happened in the preceding plays.  He was asked about that and went AWOL - but keep repeating the story endlessly on site.      

Malherbe is useless in the tight loose. He contributes nothing other than leaning on his opponent in the set piece and as we've seen many times over is technically flawed.

We have issues at 3 ...

Haaaaaaaaaahahahahahaaaa!!

Thanks .. yes ... it's a relief to know that he and I see things differently.

Mozart

Nobody ever claimed that Willemse is a smarter full back than Le Roux - how did you dream that one up?   What you were asked you never answered.   With Le Roux playing the style of rugby he uses so successfully - where would he have been with the sequence of play preceding  the penalty borne in mind?    You refused to answer that question as you love to write simplistic BS without substance on site.

Your suggestion of Du Toit is the worst anybody ever evaluated player performances - the most  effective SA forward must be on the bench    That really is laughable total rugby ignorance based on petty hatred.

So - lets ask another simple question - who do you want as a loosie combination for the next test series?   You never provided an answer to that question other than you wat Du Toit out of contention.   So tell us whom you want at 6, 7 and 8?.

Your rating on that scale is total failure as a "P-", but that could move up if you answer the simple questions in this posting.      

Come now, Mike ... even I know his response to that ...

6. Louw ... 7. Alberts ... 8. Vermeulen

CC

That will place him at "S-"

  You found one quote from CC and now it is suddenly the alpha and omega.   So I accept that it was CC who wrote it as a deviation so as not to answer the other questions.  I have no bosom biddies- I have my own mind about things and have in the past differed from him on issues 

What about the other questions you avoided like a plague.    I asked y ou specific questions and you avoided them like the plague.    So lets get it straight - ae you too ignorant top ask straightforward questions? 

  You found one quote from CC and now it is suddenly the alpha and omega.   So I accept that it was CC who wrote it as a deviation so as not to answer the other questions.  I have no bosom biddies- I have my own mind about things and have in the past differed from him on issues 

What about the other questions you avoided like a plague.    I asked y ou specific questions and you avoided them like the plague.    So lets get it straight - ae you too ignorant top ask straightforward questions? 

What about the other questions you avoided like a plague.    I asked you specific questions and you avoided them like the plague.    So lets get it straight - are you too ignorant to answer  straightf orward questions? 

Question 1

With Le Roux playing the style of rugby he uses so successfully - where would he have been with the sequence of play preceding  the penalty borne in mind? 

Question 2   

So - lets ask another simple question - who do you want as a loosie combination for the next test series?  You never provided an answer to that question other than you want Du Toit out of contention.   So tell us whom you want at 6, 7 and 8?.

Oh Koosie will never admit that his infamous " The Springboks have a nil to zero chance of winning the RWC" is still to this day the numero uno omelette award winning prediction . With eggnogg still dripping from his dumb face 11 years later he now ventures into a plea to support a piss poor Kapitan in Kolisi.

Hilarious stuff.

Keep em coming ou Koosie, you're a funny man and asseblief don't recuse yourself from any predictions like you've recused yourself from mole hunting......the board will be much less amussing.

@Mike

Point me to where i've supported Wilco Louw?

Think you've got yourself into another tail spin.

Moz, I hope you realize you're wasting energy on ou CC. His barks, never stop, U-Turns, never stop , he even U-Turns on his U-Turns. 

I guess you now understand why I told the UTurner to stick his olive branch gesture up his UTurning ass.

The "man" cannot be trusted.......it's that simple.

Mozart

Are you really stupid or do you just being so when discussing rugby issues?    Have you ever watched where Le Roux is when the Springboks - or for that matter Sales - have possession of the ball.   It is always in a position where he can join up with the backline - so far away from where he would be when the opposition  has possession of the ball 

To state that Le Roux would be in a position to catch the ball in this case is either foolhardy idiocy or complete and total BS.  Can you never follow players when it comes to positional play - especially a special player like Le Roux whose whole game on attack consists of joining the backline in attacking moves.  And the Springboks was in possession of the ball before the turnover resulting in the penalty.

Sure - Mostert at 7 - where he failed when the Lions on request of Erasmus tried him out and where he is not physically strong enough to play a role.   You obviously noted how many possession turnovers he has made at breakdowns and how many line-outs he has taken on opposition throw-in in lineouts .  The answer to both is ZERO.

But you obviously also have not taken note of the substandard performances of Vermeulen in the third test in June - his decision to skip the RC and his below par performances in the EOYT tests.   Is he still up to standard as a player to be selected on a basis of performance?

Mozart - Mozart - Mozart - your rating is near to zero when it comes to player performance evaluation.    

So erm Mike, are you going to duck/dive out of your allegation?

Sorry Denny

It was Rooinek who came up with the team including Wilco Louw.  I apologize.  

You guess is totally imaginary.   There is now ay that your imagination would count anything when reality takes over.   You have had so many imaginations in what you write on site that it is really an impossibility to believe you in this case.    

Would Le Roux hang back when the Springboks have the ball and is attacking in the AB half of the field?   Not on your nelly - it would not happen - so happy imagination to you.   

Now for the following quote from you which I did not comment on - even though it has an impact on the loosie issue:-

"The truth is Stephanie may do some good things but he isn't a complete flank or a complete lock....that remains an issue. My solution is to play him as a sub....he only has a good 20 minutes every game anyway."

The 20 minute issue is one of the most amazing things I have ever read on site.   I do know you have a classical ability to dream up things - but this is really amazing BS.   Do you really believe that it happens?    I can understand it if you refer to low work rate players like Vermeulen and Etzebeth here - but Du Toit who is the highest work rate forward in the team - amazing imagination to create BS.

Now lets get to  Vermeulen and what he achieved in the tests he played in where I claimed he failed:-

3rd June test against England       

Most people I\on site was not impressed with what Vermeulen achieved in that test so lets look at his ESPN stats:-

Balls passed                     -           1

Balls carried                     -           8

Meters gained                  -           13

Defenders beaten             -             1

Turnovers conceded        -             2

Tackles made                  -              8

England

How many defenders tackled Duane? Which part of the defence did he attack? Who were the cleaners? How many turnovers were the result of handling errors? Which tackles should he have made, you can reference his most recent test for convenience. Until you have answers for these questions, we really don't learn anything from the numbers you post. Stats are the first stage of an analysis, not the last. You think you've pointed out some issues, now you need to investigate them and bring your findings here. If you are onto something, I'd be interested to see where it leads. 

By the way, Steph leads the entire Bok squad for missed tackles. 

Hmmm ... ??

As expected ... Poepies has a lot to say ... mouthing off at us all the time ... trying really hard to impress us with his rugby knowledge ... a supposed expert ... or so he claims ... and then a simple request for his match 23 floors him ... exposes him as a sham ... a clueless coward ...

Haaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahaaaa.

I don't think Moffie and his Servile Gimps are capable of selecting a Springbok match 23. They probably wouldn't be able to name 23 players. 

Their expertise is in trying to belittle other posters and having a little snigger at everyone else's predictions or team selections. That's what they do well so rather leave them to it. You'll probably have to make some kind of apology for even asking Moffie to put up his squad.

Dimnest  AO

He also made a hell of a lot more tackles than anybody else and how did you get to that BS statement you came up with - dimness?   Another sweeping statement you cannot prove - like so many similar statement by Mozart and co..  According to one calculation by you dimness Du Toit played in 14 tests making 171 tackles and missing 31.   So let me work that out:-

Average tackles per game    -    12,21  

Missed tackle ratio               -     15,35  

That is not the issue dimness.   For a loosie to make 33 tackles missing 7 in 5 tests means he has missed the count by at least another 5  tackles a game to be of any use AS A LOOSIE.

 So lets compare that with Vermeulen   with his average 5, 6 tackles per game and his missed tackle ratio of 17,5.   Since when is an average tackle count of 5,6 better than 12,21 and a missed tackle ratio of 17,5 better than 15,35.  

The rest of you statement is utter normal AO Bullshit as per normal. .  

Then there's the most shameful thing, defending the selection of Kolisi as captain....initiated by Rooi Urine and unctiously supported by Turncoat who is so anxious for approval he abandons his whole history. 

Turncoat has never been his own person, he always wanted to sound like Urine and carry on in the image of Urine hence the reason his lost whatever pathetic character he might have actually owned.

Now the personal attacks is all the answer one can get from the rugby illiterates,   This is getting funnier by every new post made.   

But then the limitless imaginations of idiocy displayed by Mozart which -

*    becomes stronger with every player he hates in the team;  and 

*    find imaginary reasons to cover real flops and not imaginary ones, 

kicks in with a vengeance.

One has to reach a logical conclusion - the rugby idiocy of the Village Idiots led by Mozart reach higher levels with every imagination Mozart dreams up.  His fellow idiots are even too stupid to do that.