So Clean Cut.....
Denny ... clearly your having a go at me ... trying to teach me a lesson so to speak ... and even though I may have confessed that I have no real interest in the game ... I'm not stupid ... as your implying.
There is nothing complicated about our demise. It's logical.
It is usually an easy task to replace a player or two when they retire by bringing in a prospect that's been blooded in previous games.
A prospect with the potential to go far ... not some quota to appease the masses.
A smooth transition.
There should by rights be no real crisis in doing so ... if the proper preparation had been made as is usually the case in all team sport globally.
However ... when one suffers the loss of several key players at the same time one can expect a bit of a slump in performance ... but that's not the case here ... is it?
Smith called it a day ages ago and so did Kallis. That's two key players ... only two ... not 5 or 6 ... one of which contributed very little any way.
They haven't played for the country in ages.
It is only the team's recent form that's in question now.
We've always sucked against top tier teams but never as badly as we do now.
It has nothing to do with Smith nor Kallis. That's just a feeble excuse to distract us from the real issues which to my mind are :-
1. Selections - which include quotas and out of form players that should have been dropped.
2. Captaincy - selecting a chump who is a proven failure not only as a captain but as a tactician ... he's unable to come up with a battle plan that'll make us competitive.
Simple.
Now let me put this back in your court.
Pray tell, my learned friend, why we suck so badly at the sport of cricket? Why we've never challenged for the title in a final? Why we're known globally as chokers ... from generation to generation??
I eagerly await your response.
Seriously, would even one of those players be good enough to replace anyone in the great Springbok team of 1970? Which of this crop would replace the likes of Barry Richards, Eddie Barlow, Graeme Pollock or Peter Pollock? Which of Hansie Cronje's team of the late 90s would you drop for one of this sad lot? Gary Kirsten? Jacques Kallis? Darryl Cullinan? Hansie Cronje? Brian McMillan? Shaun Pollock? Lance Klusener? Allan Donald? Now those were teams!
Heck, other than our three current world class players (AB, Hash and Steyn) which of the current mediocre crop could even dream of replacing anyone in Clive Rice's great Transvaal side of the 1970s? Huh? These current okes wouldn't even have been 12th man for some of the provincial sides back in the 70s and early 80s.
No, our current crop of test players are as poor as anything in living memory. I honestly cannot think of a worse Springbok/Protea test side than this bunch of very ordinary plodders. Feel free to remind me of some of the teams of the past that the likes of Stiaan van Zyl, Quinton de Kock and Kyle Abbott would crack.
Sometimes one can take statistics at face value but in some cases you have to look at the influence of outliers. When your sample is very large, the influence of outliers becomes less of an issue. When you are dealing with a small sample, outliers can play a massive role.
Clinically, Amla averages 52.13 in tests and 49.66 in tests as captain. He has played in 90 tests (large sample) but he has only captained the side fourteen times (small sample).
A blind man can feel with a broom handle that Amla's batting as a captain has been crap, despite his official average of 49.66. His batting averages as a captain is boosted by two things, i.e. (1) one century and two double centuries as well as (2) the fact that he was not out on two occasions. In addition to that, one of those not out occasions was when he made his one century against Sri Lanka in Jul 2014. If you do look at his 14 tests as captain more closely, then the influence of the century, the two double centuries as well as the not outs become more significant. In those 14 tests, where one would normally expect him to have batted at least 28 times, he only actually batted 20 times, making the sample even smaller and the effect of the outliers even bigger.
To put things in even better perspective, he has scored less than 30 in twelve of his 20 innings as a test captain. Out of his 20 innings as a test test captain, he has only scored the following good innings including the century and the two double centuries: 139* v SL in SL in 2014208 v WI at Centurion in 201433 v WI in PE in 201463 v WI at Newlands in 201438* v WI at Newlands in 201343 v India at Mohali in Nov 201539 v India at Nagpur in Nov 2015201 v England at Newlands in 2016
That is eight decent scores in 20 innings as a captain. That means that he has failed, as a batsman in 60% of his captain's innings. That is, of course, if you deem a score of thirty as a decent score for a test opening batsman. If not...... well, then the situation becomes much worse.
Fact is that Amla, himself, he's come to realise that his batting was pretty crap when he was captaining the side and has wisely decided to focus on what he knew his real strength is, i.e. his batting without the burden of the captaincy.
My guess is that he has made the correct decision for his own sake as well as for the sake of the Proteas. Win-win.
Quite correct but that was not the argument that was raised on another thread. On that thread it was implied that the captaincy of the Dolphins influenced his batting at the Dolphins and that he was supposedly dropped because of that. That was way off the mark. He got his initial spot into the national side on the back of his batting performances at the Dolphins. When he was then dropped from the national side and upon his return to the Dolphins, the first thing that he did was to relinquish the captaincy in order to fix his batting. The captaincy of the Dolphins therefore never had any influence on his batting for the Doplhins.
Disagree... and I'd have to say that it's one of our worst test sides since re-admission.For starters the Proteas don't have an opening pair of note.......Elgar is still trying to establish himself while Stiaan at the other end is a converted middle order batsman who iis clearly out of his depth as an opener. Pity the first drop who has to frontup as an opener after the now customary early exit. The team also lacks a quality allrounder. QDK iis struggling at test level and as a matter of fact thus far he's been a failure. JP Duminy cannot be relied upon and I tend to think he's there for the free ride. BTW the current allrounder Morris is on the wrong side of 28 which is neither here nor there except to say that there is no young gun knocking down the door. I can't help believe that 20/20 cricket has added to the demise of quality test batsmen.....cricketers follow the money trail and 20/20 is where it's at......something had to give.
The interesting question is whether this is an aberration, or the new reality.
Hard to say Moz and I wish I have an answer but I hope it's the former. We might have a better idea after the current series and again when we front the Kiwis.
Denny ... Graeme Smith retired from test cricket when?? March 2014? Do I have that about right?
That's near on 2 years ago.
Please explain to me how it's possible that his absence is still being felt by our current side? While your at it, please include why it is that we were unable to find a replacement opening bat in all that time?
I'm talking test cricket here, Denny!!
Jacques Kallis retired from cricket when? July 2014? Do I have that right?
I repeat the question. It's near on 2 years later and still we're looking back in history to find excuses for our current dismal display.
Oh and by the way ... I'm talking test cricket here, Denny.
I stand by what I said. Our selection policies are racist based.
We're keeping out of form players on when by rights they should have been dropped ages ago.
No-one was properly blooded in preparation of possible retirements. No back up players of any sort.
You do not have the right to play for the country unless your able to contribute properly. Amla has been sub standard ... with bat and as captain and so have many others.
Sphincter Boy is wet behind the ears. I'm starting to wonder if he knows anything about the sport at all. It seems as if he knows even less than I do ... yet he has much to say ... the usual ignorant nonsense.
The potential faggot wants to hold on to the muslim who's produced nothing but sub standard performances, as Ceradyne so nicely pointed out.
Why?
Is it the colour of his skin or does him bowing down to the moon god qualify him for selection?
For how long should he keep coming on to the pitch as an opening bat only to leave 10 minutes later with his 12 runs??
I'm in complete agreement with Redneck. Those boys were top of the line cricket players who we had faith in. We went to war with them every time they played. It was nail biting edge of your seat stuff back then.
This current bunch is more likely to be pelted with rotten fruit than be cheered for.
I'm afraid it's all gone horribly wrong and I can't see it improving any day soon.
The 3rd test match starts today and I'm looking forward to it.
Let us see if the latest cricket god can chalk up another ton.
I'm hoping they'll be playing on a pitch that has a little in it for the bowler.
Go England!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Come now, Denny ... you know of whom I speak.
Temba Bavuma!!
This quota pick comes aboard, chalks up a century, on a dead pitch, and is being haled as the best thing to have ever donned a pair of cricket pads.
I need a little more than that before I start worshiping him.
Van Zyl?? Who's that? Oh you mean the chump that should have been placed further down the order or dropped altogether?
Well ... hasn't he been a disappointment so far? Another non contributor who seems to own his spot in the team no matter what.
Poepol Naaier ... we would most definitely expect an immediate contribution from the muslim ... especially now that he's been willingly discarded as Kapitan.
Why do you sound so trepid? Not very confident in your bearded boy are you?
I hope they bowl him out for a duck!!
How's your girlfriend?
Cook, AB lead calls for ICC to protect tests
Test cricket must adapt to survive in the face of the ever-tightening squeeze from shorter, more lucrative, forms of the game, both England and South Africa's captains said on Wednesday.
Calling for more structure in the cluttered cricket schedule, Alastair Cook and AB de Villiers agreed there is a growing tug on player commitments between the traditional format and Twenty20 competitions like the Indian Premier League (IPL) and Australia's Big Bash.
"I think it's a growing concern for the ICC (International Cricket Council) and they've been talking about it for the last few years," De Villiers, whose own workload between test cricket and his earning potential in the T20 format has been widely debated in recent weeks, said.
He reportedly earns $1.4m playing in the IPL for Royal Challengers Bangalore – dwarfing his South Africa contract.
In a separate news conference on Wednesday ahead of the third test between the two countries at the Wanderers in Johannesburg, Cook said that while the five-day game still represented the ultimate test for a player, it could not risk standing still.
"Everyone loves test cricket, I believe," Cook said.
"We all know we have to protect test cricket. As the game progresses and evolves, you can't stand still.
"We have to always look to how we can improve the game. The people who run it must know there is a responsibility on their shoulders to look after it and try and push it forward."
DAY-NIGHT TESTS
The recent introduction of day-night tests in Australia is seen as a positive step, but De Villiers said the the Future Tours Programme, which determines bilateral cricket fixtures for the next six years, needed to be examined.
"I believe there are areas to improve and help keep the players focused in on the test game, he said.
"Obviously there are one or two (T20) tournaments going on around the world and financially you cannot ignore them because they do make a huge difference to our lives.
"You've got to look after that side as well but test cricket comes first. One or two things will have to change for the future."
On Monday, England's most successful bowler James Anderson said he would not be seeking to play in the IPL in order to rest for England's home test commitments against Sri Lanka and Pakistan from May to August.
"I'm at this stage of my career, I want to make sure I'm in good nick to play test match cricket for England. A couple of months' rest won't be a bad thing. My heart is with playing test cricket for England," he told reporters.


