So what is HM thinking in his selections

You might think you have Saffex in a bag...I'm not really sure why you would think that was something to be proud of. It just highlights a perversion to me  As for having him on the ropes.....good lord.....delusional ! I suggest you see someone, my Dr is lovely. I could ask if you want ? He might help with your obsessive behaviour whilst he's at it. 

I think what you have just shown us all is that you like to mount campaigns against those who disagree with you or go against your will. A lovely insight into your persona really. You are showing us more about yourself than Saffex is about him.  In this instance, Saffex made the heinous error of disliking Morne Steyn, the player you idolise. And we all know how you have reacted to that ! You see, you have taken it as a personal slight, and now we see how highly you hold your opinion, don't we ? Your reaction says it all. 
The thing is, if it was me acting in such an embarrassing way about a player, you would be ripping me to shreds. Because I am female. But you ? Crikey ! It beggars belief sometimes ! 
You are delusional if you think you are "winning" something, and this seems so important to you. You also have shown us all how tragic you are with your obsessive regurgitation of posts from yesteryear.  And your absolute refusal to ever be wrong about anything, ever. 
But I am sure you will find a "humorous" graphic and retort.....oh we will all laugh. Not. 

 

Hmmmm and here we have becs (to the rescue) in her new role of psychoanalyst.

I will let you in on something. I love debate. Really. What I do not like is people who think that anybody who disagrees with the are stupid and backwards. Yes, I know that you are actually accusing me of exactly that but there is a subtle difference. Why do you think that I am "on Safesex and ou Maaikie's case"? Let me tell you.

Let me deal with your sweetheart, Safesex, first. The very first time that I ever dared to disagree with him, I was called a stupid fucking prick. That later turned into his hate for Afrikaans speaking people to burst open, and I became a fucking Dutchman with a comb in my sock, etc. What he could not, and cannot, do is to convince me when I know that I am right. I have always been willing to debate my viewpoints and I have no problem to acknowledge when I am wrong. The problem is that I do ensure that what I say can be substantiated, and when it is an opinion, I say that it is an opinion. The problem with your sweetheart is that he regard his opinion as FACT, and that is not just my opinion. Anybody who dares to disagree with his fact/opinion is a fucking stupid prick.

Then we have ou Maaikie. He is one of the biggest hypocrites that I have ever come across. He is forever accusing others of exactly what he does himself. Our first few discussions were quite "normal" until the first time that I disagreed with him. He then fell back on his normal "stats" to prove something and he was wrong. When I pointed out where he was wrong it was the start of the "hostilities". From that moment on it was like petrol and fire every time he said somethig because I started checking up on what he posted. I even said, at the time, that there was no need to bullshit, lie or exaggerate to make a point. Just be accurate in your argumenst and that is enough. Instead of at least giving it a go, he just carried on and he crapped himself, and still does, every time that I challenge the accuracy of his remarks.

Having said all of the above, I can also remember when was the first time you and I "crossed swords" and strange enough, it was also about something where I was correct. It was over UK visas and visa requirements. Your argument was that  I would not know because I was not British. The fact was that, me being non-British, the chances were very good that I would have a better knowledge about the visa requirements and application procedures. I have actually been through the mill while it is questionable whether you, as a British citizen would ever have had the need to apply for a UK visa. You were seriously upset when I was eventually proven to have been correct. You see, dear becs (to the rescue), it is not a matter of always having to be correct and not liking it when people do not disagree with me. It is more a matter of me making sure that I am correct, in which case nobody in their right minds can realistically expect of me to believe the opposite. You sweetheart, for instance, want me to prove that he did not mix the two Steyns up. I have nothing to prove. He has wanted prove that he had him in his team. I provided that. As a learned "lawyer", he should know that the burden to prove the opposite is now on him. For me, it is a matter of "I rest my case". (And, like him, I am not even a lawyer but that is a story for another day. )

 saggex, ceradyne doesnt have you in a bag, you put yiurself in it,... he just had the decency to put thst bag in the trash.

 Here we have the alliance of rugby illiterates all in one thread.  We have Ceramoron, Mo(zart)ron and Bonzo the Ape.   Very near to zero brain function among those three - they in fact share ONE MALFUNCTIONING BRAIN CELL.    That is why they always come up with the same illiterate rubbish.    

Sorry, I didn't quite get that. What did you say ? When were you lying about Pollard?